Cited by 201Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Psychological distress associated with interpersonal violence: A meta-analysis

Weaver, Terri L., Clum, George A.·1995·Clinical Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0272-7358(95)00004-9

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An earlier meta-analysis of interpersonal violence and distress found no evidence that validity indicators were related to effect size.

    “Although a past meta-analysis on the relationship between interpersonal violence and distress did not find evidence that indicators of validity were associated with the magnitude of observed effects (Weaver & Clum, 1995)”

    From Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Weaver & Clum, 1995

  • In a meta-analysis of distress and interpersonal violence, longer time since the stressor was linked to smaller effect sizes.

    “In a meta-analysis of the association between distress and interpersonal violence, time since stressor was negatively associated with effect sizes (Weaver & Clum, 1995)”

    From Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Weaver & Clum, 1995

  • One meta-analysis found that a higher proportion of women in the sample was linked to a stronger relationship between interpersonal victimization and psychological distress.

    “One meta-analysis found that the percentage of women in the sample was positively associated with the magnitude of the relationship between interpersonal victimization and psychological distress (Weaver & Clum, 1995)”

    From Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Weaver & Clum, 1995

  • An earlier meta-analysis found no difference in distress between SA and other interpersonal trauma types, but it did not compare SA with non-interpersonal traumas.

    “An earlier meta-analysis on psychological distress related to interpersonal violence found no difference between SA and other interpersonal trauma types in terms of their level of distress (Weaver & Clum, 1995), but did not compare SA to non-interpersonal traumas.”

    From Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Weaver & Clum, 1995

  • Interpersonal violence does not always lead to psychopathology.

    “Interpersonal violence does not inevitably lead to psychopathology (Weaver & Clum, 1995)”

    From Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Weaver & Clum, 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weaver, T. L., & Clum, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Weaver, Terri L.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-01
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
115-140
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032258746
Cited by
200
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
psychological distress, interpersonal violence, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, rape, assault, domestic violence, partner abuse, self-blame, perceived life threat, stress appraisal, personal injury, weapon use, victimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review