Cited by 21Mental Health Treatment and AccessMigration, Health and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

A Qualitative Evaluation of Barriers to Care for Trauma-Related Mental Health Problems Among Low-Income Minorities in Primary Care

Open access
Chung, Joyce Y., Frank, Lori, Subramanian, Asha, Galen, Steve, Leonhard, Sarah, Green, Bonnie L.·2012·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators of mental health care for patients with trauma histories via qualitative methods with clinicians and administrators from primary care clinics for the underserved. Individual interviews were conducted, followed by a combined focus group with administrators from three jurisdictions; there were three focus groups with clinicians from each clinic system. Common themes were identified, and responses from groups were compared. Administrators and clinicians report extensive trauma histories among patients. Clinician barriers include lack of time, patient resistance, and inadequate referral options; administrators cite reimbursement issues, staff training, and lack of clarity about the term trauma. A key facilitator is doctor-patient relationship. There were differences in perceived barriers and facilitators at the institutional and clinical levels for mental health care for patients with trauma. Importantly, there is agreement about better access to and development of trauma-specific interventions. Findings will aid the development and implementation of trauma-focused interventions embedded in primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31825322b3

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to an accurate and timely PTSD diagnosis may be attributable to the lack of disclosure of trauma history by patients and to limited awareness and knowledge of trauma-associated symptoms among physicians within a civilian context, including limited training and resources in trauma care.

    “The barriers to an accurate and timely PTSD diagnosis may also be attributable to the lack of disclosure of trauma history by patients [19] and the limited awareness and knowledge of trauma-associated symptoms among physicians within a civilian context, including limited training and resources in trauma care [20,33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Friedman MJ Schnurr PP Friedman MJ Charney DS Deutch AY 1995 The relationship between trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder and physical health Neurobiological and clinical consequences of stress: From normal adaptation to post-traumatic stress disorder 507 524 Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  2. Strauss AC Corbin J 1990 Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques 2 Newbury Park, CA Sage Publications, Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, J. Y., Frank, L., Subramanian, A., Galen, S., Leonhard, S., & Green, B. L.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Primary Care Coalition of Montgomery County (US)
  • Greater Baden Medical Services (US)
Corresponding author
Chung, Joyce Y.
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2012-05
Volume
200
Issue
5
Pages
438-443
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969255448
Cited by
21
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH068450)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
barriers to mental health care, primary care, underserved populations, trauma history, trauma-focused interventions, physician-patient relationship, employee training, trauma definition, clinician perspectives, administrator perspectives
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Personnel, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Physician-Patient Relations, Poverty, Primary Health Care, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review