Cited by 153Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

A process-oriented approach to children's coping with adults' angry behavior

Cummings, E.Mark, Cummings, Jennifer L.·1988·Developmental Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0273-2297(88)90008-1

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cummings, E. M., & Cummings, J. L.
Affiliations
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • Catholic University of America (US)
Corresponding author
Cummings, E.Mark
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
296-321
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035219639
Cited by
153
References
106
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
children's coping, developmental psychopathology, family stress, age differences, sex differences, family background, maladaptive coping, stimulus characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review