Cited by 8Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Music Perception

The influence of a vasopressin-analogue (DGAVP) on event-related potentials in a stimulus-mismatch paradigm

Pietrowsky, R., Born, J., Fehm-Wolfsdorf, G., Fehm, H.L.·1989·Biological Psychology

Abstract

To assess the influence of DGAVP (des-glycinamide-arginine-8-vasopressin, a synthetic vasopressin analogue) on the processing of stimuli and stimulus deviance in humans in a double-blind cross-over experiment, 13 subjects received 60 IU DGAVP versus placebo intranasally 48, 24, and 1 h prior to the experimental session. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) were taken as a tool to investigate central nervous processing in an experimental task that required the subjects to count different kinds of rare tone pips deviating in pitch and probability compared to frequent standard tones. Direction of attention was manipulated by instructing the subject to count a different class of deviating tone pips in each attention condition. DGAVP enhanced the N2 of the ERP to tone pips deviating extremely in pitch from standard tones, whether or not the extremely deviating pips were to be attended to by the subjects. This influence suggests an intensified mismatch processing under DGAVP that may result from a general excitatory effect of this substance on cortical activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0301-0511(89)90003-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intravenous administration of vasopressin enhanced plasma vasopressin but did not affect brain activity measured by event-related potentials.

    “More importantly, intravenous administration of AVP enhanced plasma AVP but did not affect the brain activity (measured by ERP) (Pietrowsky et al. 1989), showing that the effects after IN-AVP are not dependent on the AVP plasma concentration.”

    From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Pietrowsky et al. 1989

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pietrowsky, R., Born, J., Fehm-Wolfsdorf, G., & Fehm, H. L.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Pietrowsky, R.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-06
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
239-250
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025301235
Cited by
8
References
24
Citations by year
2017: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
vasopressin analogue, auditory event-related potentials, N2 component, attentional bias, pitch deviance, intranasal administration, cortical excitability
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Arginine Vasopressin, Arousal, Attention, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Male, Pitch Discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review