The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative study of perceived pain and nociceptive flexion reflex in man
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the amplitude of the flexion reflex of the biceps femoris muscle (BF) with the intensity of the painful sensation elicited by a nociceptive stimulation resulting from application of constant-current either on the sural nerve or on the skin in its distal receptive field. Experiments were carried out on 15 normal volunteers. It was observed that: (1) Stimulation of the sural nerve (either on or through the skin) elicits two different reflex responses in the BF: the first (RII) is of short latency, low threshold and corresponds to a tactile reflex. The second (RIII) is of longer latency and higher threshold, and corresponds to a nociceptive reflex. The threshold of RIII was found to be the threshold of a pain sensation. (2) Stimulation of the skin elicits only a late nociceptive (RIII) response in the BF. The threshold of this response was also found to be that of pain. (3) The threshold of both pain and RIII were found to be higher for sural nerve stimulation (10 mA) than for cutaneous stimulation (5 mA). It was suggested that the large diameter cutaneous fibers could have an inhibitory effect of both pain and the nociceptive reflex. This was supported by the results obtained during a selective ischemic block of the largest diameter fibers in the sural nerve, when a 10 mA stimulation was applied to the nerve. In this case, a decrease of the RII reflex was observed in BF, together with an increase of both RIII and pain sensation. Functional implications of these results are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BEECHER, H. K. (1946) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-194601000-00008 · Cited by 443
Cited by
Le Bars, D., Gozariu, M., & Cadden, S. W. (2001) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01514-x · Cited by 1,459
Willer, J. C., Dehen, H., & Cambier, J. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6261330 · Cited by 334
A comparison of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in men and women
France, C. R., & Suchowiecki, S. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00272-3 · Cited by 165
Effects of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls on temporal summation of the RIII reflex in humans
Serrao, M., Rossi, P., Sandrini, G., Parisi, L., Amabile, G. A., Nappi, G., & Pierelli, F. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.018 · Cited by 149
Coffin, B., Bouhassira, D., Sabaté, J.-M., Barbe, L., & Jian, R. (2004) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2003.031310 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- de Willer, J. C.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-80
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061178662
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative study of perceived pain and nociceptive flexion reflex in man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(77)90036-7
- The paper
- de Willer, J. C. (1977). Comparative study of perceived pain and nociceptive flexion reflex in man. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(77)90036-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.