CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 151Narrative Theory and AnalysisLiterary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text

Magliano, Joseph P., Graesser, Arthur C.·1991·Poetics
DOI 10.1016/0304-422x(91)90007-c
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-422x(91)90007-c

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 136 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Danks, 1986, Identifying component processes in reading: Comment on Haberlandt and Graesser, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 198
  2. Graesser, 1986, The construction of knowledge structures and inferences during text comprehension, Vol. 1, 125
  3. Stein, 1979, An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children, Vol. 2, 53
  4. Stein, 1987, Thinking about feelings: The development and organization of emotional knowledge, Vol. 3, 165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 151

Related

Metadata

Authors
Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
Corresponding author
Magliano, Joseph P.
ORCID
Venue
Poetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
193-232
ISSN
0304-422X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0304-422x(91)90007-c
OpenAlex
W2062318970
Cited by
151
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
127.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Poetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
inference generation, literary comprehension, verbal protocols, discourse processing, behavioral measures, literary works, reading comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review