Cited by 105Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNerve injury and regeneration

Two types of cholinergic projections to the rat amygdala

Heckers, S., Mesulam, M.-M.·1994·Neuroscience

Abstract

The cholinergic innervation of the rat amygdala was studied immunohistochemically with antibodies against choline acetyltransferase and the low affinity p75 nerve growth factor receptor in normal rats and in rats lesioned with an immunotoxin, 192 IgG-saporin, directed against the p75 nerve growth factor receptor. The density of choline acetyltransferase-positive fibers was high in the nucleus of the lateral olfactory tract, the basolateral nucleus, and the amygdalohippocampal area; medium in the lateral nucleus, the cortical nucleus, the accessory basal nucleus, the periamygdaloid cortex, and the anterior amygdaloid area; and low in the medial and central nuclei. Nerve growth factor receptor-positive fibers were of medium density in the lateral nucleus, the accessory basal nucleus, the cortical nucleus, the anterior amygdaloid area, the periamygdaloid cortex, and the amygdalohippocampal area. The medial nucleus and the central nucleus displayed a low density of nerve growth factor receptor-positive fibers. The basolateral nucleus and the nucleus of the lateral olfactory tract also contained a low density of nerve growth factor receptor-positive fibers even though the two nuclei displayed the highest density of choline acetyltransferase-positive fibers in the amygdala. Injections of 192 IgG-saporin induced a complete loss of cholinergic nerve growth factor receptor-positive neurons in the basal forebrain but spared a subpopulation of nerve growth factor receptor-negative choli…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90252-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heckers, S., & Mesulam, M.-M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Heckers, S.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-05
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
383-397
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093811993
Cited by
105
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns020285-15)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 20285)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
cholinergic projections, amygdala, choline acetyltransferase, p75 nerve growth factor receptor, 192 IgG-saporin, cholinergic neurons, basolateral amygdala, stria terminalis, acetylcholinesterase, rats
MeSH terms
Saporins, Amygdala, Animals, Immunotoxins, Brain, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Immunoglobulin G, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Nerve Fibers, Neurons, N-Glycosyl Hydrolases, Plant Proteins, Gene Expression, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Nerve Growth Factor, Rats, Ribosome Inactivating Proteins, Type 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review