CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Regulation of Appetite and ObesityDiabetes Management and ResearchDiet and metabolism studies

Dietary self-selection in diabetic rats: an overview

Bellush, Linda L., Rowland, Neil E.·1986·Brain Research Bulletin
DOI 10.1016/0361-9230(86)90197-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The literature concerning dietary self-selection patterns of diabetic rats is reviewed and compared with new data. There is agreement among the various investigators as to the dietary choices observed following induction of diabetes, regardless of the diabetogenic treatment used. That is, moderately diabetic rats select a high fat, low carbohydrate diet, whereas more severely diabetic animals consume high protein, low carbohydrate diets with little change in fat consumption relative to nondiabetic controls. Even very midly diabetic rats reduce carbohydrate intake. Evaluation of metabolic status of diabetics suggests that with severe diabetes, the beneficial reduction of plasma glucose seen with consumption of a high fat diet may be offset by extreme elevations in ketone and triglyceride levels. Moreover, the hypothesis that diabetic rats are insensitive to carbohydrate calories seems weakened by evidence of reduced food intake following carbohydrate consumption either in solutions or as a gastric load. These findings are discussed in terms of "dietary wisdom" as first proposed by Richter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0361-9230(86)90197-8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animals tend to avoid carbohydrates when carbohydrate metabolism is defective or altered, particularly during states of diabetes.

    “animals tend to avoid carbohydrates when carbohydrate metabolism is defective or altered, particularly during states of diabetes”

    From FGF21 and the physiological regulation of macronutrient preference (2020) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Bellush, L. L., & Rowland, N. E.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Rowland, Neil E.
ORCID
Rowland, Neil E.
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-11
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
653-661
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0361-9230(86)90197-8
OpenAlex
W2068907943
Cited by
12
References
30
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
dietary self-selection, diabetes mellitus, diabetic rats, low-carbohydrate high-fat diet, high-protein diet, carbohydrate intake, plasma glucose, ketone bodies, triglycerides, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Food Preferences, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review