Cited by 40High-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

Expansion velocity of cosmological QCD bubbles

Kajantie, K.·1992·Physics Letters B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0370-2693(92)91513-9

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The issue of stability of strange quark matter has not been settled yet.

    “The issue of stability of strange quark matter has not been settled yet; for a recent review see [97].”

    From Phase Transitions in the Early and Present Universe (2006) · cites this paper as [97]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kajantie, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Kajantie, K.
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
285
Issue
4
Pages
331-335
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983321243
Cited by
40
References
23
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
QCD phase transition, bubble nucleation, entropy increase, cosmological phase transitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review