Cited by 207Heavy metals in environmentHeavy Metals in PlantsGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping

European species of Thlaspi L.(Cruciferae) as indicators of nickel and zinc

Reeves, R.D., Brooks, R.R.·1983·Journal of Geochemical Exploration

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0375-6742(83)90073-0

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thlaspi species belonging to Cruciferae collected from Europe accumulate Ni at 1000-30000 μg g-1 dry mass and Zn up to 1000 μg g-1 dry mass.

    “Ni is accumulated at 1000–30000 μg g-1 of dry mass basis, whereas Zn up to 1000 μg g-1 of dry mass basis) Thlaspi species belonging to Cruciferae (mustard family) were collected from Europe (Reeves and Brooks, 1983).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeves, R. D., & Brooks, R. R.
Affiliations
Massey University (NZ)
Venue
Journal of Geochemical Exploration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-10
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
275-283
ISSN
0375-6742 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029265975
Cited by
207
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geochemical Exploration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Keywords
Thlaspi, nickel accumulation, zinc accumulation, metal hyperaccumulation, bioindicators, serpentine soils, mineral exploration, herbarium specimen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review