Cited by 96Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentYouth, Drugs, and Violence

An examination of the cocaine relapse process

Open access
McKay, James R., Rutherford, Megan J., Alterman, Arthur I., Cacciola, John S., Kaplan, Mara R.·1995·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Although empirical studies of the relapse process have been done with alcoholics, smokers, and opiate addicts, comparatively little information is available on the relapse process in cocaine abusers. This paper presents data from the Cocaine Relapse Interview (CRI), a structured interview that assesses factors associated with the onset, course, and termination of cocaine relapse episodes. In a sample of 95 cocaine dependent patients, the experiences that occurred with the greatest frequency immediately prior to relapse were wanting drugs, being alone, having money, and feeling extremely bored and lonely. Following the onset of the relapse, the most frequent experience was unpleasant affect, although positive reactions were also relatively common. The factors perceived as most important in terminating relapse were painful internal states, help-seeking behaviors, and other coping responses. Three types of relapse experiences, or pathways, were identified: (a) unpleasant affect--painful internal states prior to and throughout the relapse; (b) positive affect--positive affect and pleasant social experiences prior to relapse coupled with a relatively unproblematic course; and (c) sensation seeking--sensation seeking and interpersonal problems prior to relapse coupled with mixed emotional reactions and antisocial behavior during the relapse, and interpersonal problems at relapse termination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01098-j

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
McKay, J. R., Rutherford, M. J., Alterman, A. I., Cacciola, J. S., & Kaplan, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
McKay, James R.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-04
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
35-43
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996581174
Cited by
96
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29da008399-05)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-05186, DA08399)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
Keywords
cocaine relapse, cocaine dependence, relapse triggers, help-seeking, coping, sensation seeking, interpersonal problems, antisocial behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Arousal, Cocaine, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Social Support, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review