Cited by 1,136Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory

Zuckerman, Miron·1979·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Do causal attributions serve the need to protect and / or enhance self‐esteem? In a recent review, Miller and Ross (1975) proposed that there is evidence for self‐serving effect in the attribution of success but not in the attribution of failure; and that this effect reflects biases in information‐processing rather than self‐esteem maintenance. The present review indicated that self‐serving effects for both success and failure are obtained in most but not all experimental paradigms. Processes which may suppress or even reverse the self‐serving effect were discussed. Most important, the examination of research in which self‐serving effects are obtained suggested that these attributions are better understood in motivational than in information‐processing terms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00202.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00196.x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0022-1031(76)90066-4 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0092-6566(76)90016-7 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF00287617 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/h0028821 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/h0034977 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.56 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90013-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1971.tb00059.x · DOI
  10. 10.1037/h0037448 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.33.4.395 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1973.tb02267.x · DOI
  13. Crandall V. C., 1965, Children's beliefs in their own control of reinforcements in intellectual‐academic achievement situations, Child Development, 36, 91
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00653.x · DOI
  15. Deaux K., 1976, New directions in attribution research
  16. 10.1016/0092-6566(77)90029-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/h0028071 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/h0030845 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1971.tb00060.x · DOI
  20. Feather N. T., 1973, Fear of success and causal attribution for outcome, Journal of Personality, 41, 525
  21. 10.1016/0092-6566(76)90023-4 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/h0029847 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1021 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00148.x · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0092-6566(76)90019-2 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1974.tb00563.x · DOI
  27. 10.2307/3033532 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90032-4 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1974.tb00557.x · DOI
  30. Hastorf A., 1970, Person perception
  31. 10.1037/10628-000 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1974.tb00692.x · DOI
  33. 10.1037/h0077102 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00023.x · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0092-6566(76)90018-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/ejsp.2420070303 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/h0093874 · DOI
  38. Jones E. E., 1971, The actor and the observer: Divergent perception of the causes of behavior
  39. Kanouse D. E., 1971, Negativity in evaluation
  40. Kelley H. H., 1967, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation
  41. Kelley H. H., 1971, Attribution in social interaction
  42. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1974.tb00668.x · DOI
  43. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.3.236 · DOI
  44. 10.1037/h0032244 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00162.x · DOI
  46. 10.1037/h0077090 · DOI
  47. 10.1037/0033-2909.84.1.1 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/BF00302807 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00126.x · DOI
  50. 10.2224/sbp.1976.4.1.17 · DOI
  51. 10.2466/pms.1976.42.1.127 · DOI
  52. 10.1037/h0076172 · DOI
  53. 10.1037/h0035474 · DOI
  54. 10.1037/h0021876 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0092-6566(76)90017-9 · DOI
  56. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.447 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/S0022-1031(75)80014-X · DOI
  58. Miller D. T., 1976, Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 901, 10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.901 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1037/h0076486 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90016-6 · DOI
  61. 10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1111 · DOI
  62. 10.1037/h0076505 · DOI
  63. 10.1037/h0093829 · DOI
  64. 10.1037/h0022602 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/scientificamerican1268-84 · DOI
  66. 10.1037/h0031007 · DOI
  67. 10.1037/h0076300 · DOI
  68. 10.1037/h0077103 · DOI
  69. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00178.x · DOI
  70. 10.2307/3033513 · DOI
  71. 10.1037/h0036740 · DOI
  72. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1037/h0076301 · DOI
  74. 10.1080/00224545.1973.9922617 · DOI
  75. Schlenker B. R., 1975, Group members' attributions of responsibility for prior group performance, Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6, 96
  76. 10.1177/001872677703001106 · DOI
  77. 10.1037/0022-3514.35.10.755 · DOI
  78. 10.1177/001872677602901205 · DOI
  79. 10.1037/h0032880 · DOI
  80. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00582.x · DOI
  81. 10.1037/h0028777 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/0022-1031(70)90078-8 · DOI
  83. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00704.x · DOI
  84. 10.1037/0022-3514.35.10.734 · DOI
  85. 10.1037/h0034083 · DOI
  86. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1963.tb01324.x · DOI
  87. 10.1037/0022-3514.33.4.435 · DOI
  88. Snyder M. L., 1978, New directions in attribution research
  89. 10.1037/h0035261 · DOI
  90. 10.2307/3033512 · DOI
  91. Stephan C., Attributions of success and failure in cooperative, competitive and interdependent interactions, European Journal of Social Psychology
  92. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.6.1161 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.809 · DOI
  94. 10.1037/h0027047 · DOI
  95. 10.1037/0022-3514.33.4.403 · DOI
  96. 10.1037/0022-3514.33.5.579 · DOI
  97. 10.1037/h0022733 · DOI
  98. Werner B., 1971, Perceiving the causes of success and failure
  99. 10.1037/h0029211 · DOI
  100. 10.1037/h0028915 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90029-4 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90011-5 · DOI
  103. 10.1037/h0034949 · DOI
  104. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4004_12a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,136

Metadata

Authors
Zuckerman, M.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Zuckerman, Miron
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-06
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
245-287
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2050551731
Cited by
1,136
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 34
FWCI
117.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-serving bias, causal attribution, attribution of success, failure attribution, self-esteem, motivational bias, information processing biases, attribution theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review