Cited by 831Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis

Open access
Rubin, Donald B.·2008·The Annals of Applied Statistics

Abstract

For obtaining causal inferences that are objective, and therefore have the best chance of revealing scientific truths, carefully designed and executed randomized experiments are generally considered to be the gold standard. Observational studies, in contrast, are generally fraught with problems that compromise any claim for objectivity of the resulting causal inferences. The thesis here is that observational studies have to be carefully designed to approximate randomized experiments, in particular, without examining any final outcome data. Often a candidate data set will have to be rejected as inadequate because of lack of data on key covariates, or because of lack of overlap in the distributions of key covariates between treatment and control groups, often revealed by careful propensity score analyses. Sometimes the template for the approximating randomized experiment will have to be altered, and the use of principal stratification can be helpful in doing this. These issues are discussed and illustrated using the framework of potential outcomes to define causal effects, which greatly clarifies critical issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/08-aoas187

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although in statistical terms the use of propensity scores may produce results that differ little from those obtained through traditional regression adjustment, they encourage clearer thinking about study design and particularly the assignment mechanism.

    “Although in statistical terms the use of propensity scores may produce results that differ little from those obtained through traditional regression adjustment (70), they encourage clearer thinking about study design and particularly the assignment mechanism (66).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. BLALOCK, H. (1964). Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Research. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
  2. CAMPBELL, D. and STANLEY, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research and teaching. In Handbook of Research on Teaching (N. L. Gage, ed.). Rand McNally, Chicago.
  3. IMBENS, G. and RUBIN, D. (2008b). Causal Inference in Statistics, and in the Social and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. To appear.
  4. KENNY, D. A. (1979). Correlation and Causation. Wiley, New York.
  5. MADDALA, G. (1977). Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  6. RUBIN, D. (2006). Matched Sampling for Causal Effects. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
  7. ZELL, E., KUWANDA, M. RUBIN, D., CUTLAND, C., PATEL, R., VELAPHI S., MADHI, S. and SCHRAG, S. (2007). Conducting and analyzing a single-blind clinical trial in a developing coun- try: Prevention of perinatal sepsis, soweto, South Africa. In Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute (CD-ROM).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubin, D. B.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rubin, Donald B.
Venue
The Annals of Applied Statistics
Published
2008-09-01
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
808-840
ISSN
  • 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7330
OpenAlex
W2010505816
Cited by
831
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 28
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Applied Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0550887)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
causal inference, observational studies, randomized experiments, design-based inference, objectivity, propensity score matching, principal stratification, potential outcomes, covariate overlap, covariate selection, causal effect estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review