Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Qualitative changes of general movements in preterm infants with brain lesions

Open access
Ferrari, F., Cioni, G., Prechtl, H.F.R.·1990·Early Human Development

Abstract

The aims of the study were (1) to replicate previous quantitative studies of motor activity in low-risk and high-risk preterm infants and (2) to apply a new method of systematic analysis of the qualitative characteristics of general movements in these two groups of infants. Sequential one-hour videorecordings of the unstimulated infants in the incubator were made during the preterm period and then continued during the postterm period until about 20 weeks. The high-risk group consisted only of infants with signs of haemorrhage and/or leucomalacia in the repeated ultrasonograms of the brain. The neurological follow-up continued up to a minimum of one and a maximum of three years of corrected age. The quantification of the various motor patterns in 12 matched pairs of low-risk and high-risk preterm infants revealed a slight but significant (P = 0.05) excess of isolated arm movements in the low-risk cases during the activity phase. No other movement pattern differed significantly. The qualitative assessment of general movements during the preterm period resulted in all but one of the 14 low-risk cases having a normal quality of general movements. In the lesion-group (N = 29) all the infants had an abnormal quality during the preterm period. Eight cases later became neurologically normal although 1 of them had strabism. In addition, one infant was blind (ROP) and retarded and one other had mental retardation. Nineteen infants later developed cerebral palsy (two monoplegia of a leg, three hemiplegia, 5 diplegia and 9 quadriplegia). Strabism was present in 48.3% of the whole group of 29 cases. A semi-quantitative estimation of various aspects of the abnormal general movements made a typology of abnormal patterns possible. A graphic display of developmental trajectories of individual cases, depicting the course of abnormal aspects along the time axis, helps document the evolution of abnormal signs. Their course is a better predictor of the neurological outcome than the nature and localization of the lesion, detected by imaging techniques. The qualitative assessment of general movements from videorecordings is a reliable, quick, cheap and totally non-intrusive method in neonatology for the early detection of functional impairment of the nervous system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0378-3782(90)90013-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Ferrari, F., Cioni, G., & Prechtl, H. F. R.
Venue
Early Human Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-09
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
193-231
ISSN
0378-3782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963962914
Cited by
284
References
0
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative changes of general movements in preterm infants with brain lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0378-3782(90)90013-9
The paper
Ferrari, F., Cioni, G., & Prechtl, H. F. R. (1990). Qualitative changes of general movements in preterm infants with brain lesions. Early Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3782(90)90013-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.