Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 722

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions

Open access
Prechtl, Heinz FR, Einspieler, Christa, Cioni, Giovanni, Bos, Arend F, Ferrari, Fabizi, Sontheimer, Dieter·1997·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND In normal awake infants, fidgety movements are seen from the age of 6 weeks to 20 weeks. The aim of the study was to test the predictive value of absent or abnormal spontaneous movements in young infants for the later development of neurological deficits. METHODS In a collaborative study involving five hospitals we collected data on the normal and abnormal quality of fidgety movements of 130 infants and compared it with assessments of neurological development done longitudinally until the age of 2 years. On the basis of ultrasound scans infants were classified as at low-risk or at high-risk of neurological deficits. Infants were videoed for 1 h every week from birth to discharge and then for 15 min every 3 to 4 weeks; quality of general movements was assessed. Repeated neurological assessments were also done until 24 months of corrected age. FINDINGS 67 (96%) of 70 infants with normal fidgety movements had a normal neurological outcome. Abnormal quality or total absence of fidgety movements was followed by neurological abnormalities in 57 (95%) of the 60 infants (49 had cerebral palsy and eight had developmental retardation or minor neurological signs). Specificity and sensitivity of fidgety movement assessment were higher (96% and 95%, respectively) than of ultrasound imaging of the infants' brain (83% and 80%, respectively). INTERPRETATION Our technique of assessing spontaneous motor activity can identify and distinguish between those infants who require early intervention for neurological abnormalities and those who do not. Our technique is simple, non-intrusive, reliable, quick, and can be done on very young infants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)10182-3

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 722

Metadata

Authors
Prechtl, H. F., Einspieler, C., Cioni, G., Bos, A. F., Ferrari, F., & Sontheimer, D.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-05
Volume
349
Issue
9062
Pages
1361-1363
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2135673656
Cited by
722
References
18
FWCI
15.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)10182-3
The paper
Prechtl, H. F., Einspieler, C., Cioni, G., Bos, A. F., Ferrari, F., & Sontheimer, D. (1997). An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)10182-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.