Cited by 96Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Diagnostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with bifascicular block: a prospective study of patients with and without syncope

Open access
Englund, Anders, Bergfeldt, Lennart, Rehnqvist, Nina, Åström, Hans, Rosenqvist, Marten·1995·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with bifascicular block both with and without a history of syncope and to relate the findings to clinical events during follow-up.Background Patients with bifascicular block have an increased risk of sudden death that is not reduced by pacemaker treatment. This risk could be related to a high incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.Method Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed in 101 patients with bifascicular block: 41 had a history of unexplained syncope, and 60 were asymptomatic.Results Programmed ventricular stimulation resulted in a sustained ventricular arrhythmia in 18 patients (18%), 8 in the syncope group and 10 in the nonsyncope group (p = NS). Three patients in each group had an inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. During a mean follow-up of 21 months, 10 patients experienced a clinical event defined as sudden death (n = 4), syncope (n = 5) or appropriate discharges from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (n = 1). Only one of these patients had an inducible ventricular arrhythmia at baseline.Conclusions The inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias is high in patients with bifascicular block and of the same magnitude in patients with and without a history of syncope. Clinical events during follow-up were not predicted by programmed ventricular stimulation in either of the two groups. The finding of inducible ventricular arrhythmia in patients with bifascicular block should therefore be interpreted with caution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00354-1

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high incidence of total deaths, about one-third sudden, occurs in patients with bundle branch block and heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, or low ejection fraction.

    “a high incidence of total deaths (about one-third sudden) was observed in patients with BBB and heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, or low ejection fraction. 345-347”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [345]

    The section on bifascicular block after myocardial infarction reports markedly increased mortality in patients with bundle branch block and prior infarction. The Discussion links lower ejection fraction with death or an appropriate defibrillator discharge. But the Results report that four of five deaths were sudden, not about one-third, and do not establish a high death rate specifically for patients with heart failure. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ventricular programmed stimulation does not seem to identify patients with bundle branch block and heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, or low ejection fraction correctly.

    “Unfortunately, ventricular programmed stimulation does not seem to identify these patients correctly”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [345]

    The Discussion and Clinical implications sections say programmed ventricular stimulation had limited prognostic value in patients with bifascicular block; only one of ten patients with a clinical event had an inducible ventricular arrhythmia. The study included patients with heart failure, prior myocardial infarction, and low ejection fraction, but the cited passages do not establish predictive accuracy separately for each of those subgroups (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Syncope is not associated with an increased incidence of sudden death in patients with preserved cardiac function.

    “Although syncope is not associated with an increased incidence of sudden death in patients with preserved cardiac function”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [345]

    The Results report three sudden deaths in the syncope group and one in the nonsyncope group, but do not compare sudden-death incidence specifically among patients with preserved cardiac function. The Discussion reports a lower mean ejection fraction among patients who died or received an appropriate defibrillator discharge, but that does not establish the claimed association in the preserved-function subgroup. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Englund, A., Bergfeldt, L., Rehnqvist, N., Åström, H., & Rosenqvist, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
Corresponding author
Englund, Anders
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-11
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1508-1515
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974369276
Cited by
96
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
bifascicular block, programmed ventricular stimulation, ventricular arrhythmia inducibility, syncope, sudden cardiac death, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, sudden death risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Female, Heart Block, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syncope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review