Cited by 138Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Electrophysiologic testing in bundle branch block and unexplained syncope

Morady, Fred, Higgins, James, Peters, Robert W., Schwartz, Alan B., Shen, Edward N., Bhandari, Anil, Scheinman, Melvin M., Sauvé, Mary Jane·1984·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Thirty-two patients with bundle branch block and unexplained syncope underwent electrophysiologic testing, including programmed ventricular stimulation with up to triple extrastimuli. The infranodal conduction time (HV) was 70 ms or greater in 12 patients. Pathologic infranodal block during atrial pacing occurred in 2 patients. Unimorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was induced in 9 patients (28%) and polymorphic VT in 5 (16%). A permanent pacemaker was implanted in patients with infranodal block during atrial pacing and, generally, in patients with an HV of 70 ms or more. Patients with inducible unimorphic or sustained polymorphic VT were treated with an antiarrhythmic drug. The mean follow-up period was 19 +/- 14 months (+/- standard deviation). Three patients died suddenly: a noncompliant patient with inducible sustained VT; a patient with a normal electrophysiologic study treated empirically with quinidine for premature ventricular complexes; and a patient with an HV of 70 ms and no inducible VT treated with a permanent pacemaker. The actuarial incidence of sudden death was 10% at 45 months of follow-up. Only 2 patients had recurrent syncope; both had a normal electrophysiologic study. Approximately 50% of patients with bundle branch block and unexplained syncope who undergo electrophysiologic testing are found to have a clinically significant abnormality (HV of 70 ms or more, infranodal block during atrial pacing and inducible unimorphic VT), and some patients have more than 1 abnormality. Long-term management guided by the results of electrophysiologic testing generally is successful in preventing recurrent syncope.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90254-6

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high incidence of total deaths, about one-third sudden, occurs in patients with bundle branch block and heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, or low ejection fraction.

    “a high incidence of total deaths (about one-third sudden) was observed in patients with BBB and heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, or low ejection fraction. 345-347”
  • Syncope is not associated with an increased incidence of sudden death in patients with preserved cardiac function.

    “Although syncope is not associated with an increased incidence of sudden death in patients with preserved cardiac function”
  • Ventricular programmed stimulation does not seem to identify patients with bundle branch block and heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, or low ejection fraction correctly.

    “Unfortunately, ventricular programmed stimulation does not seem to identify these patients correctly”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morady, F., Higgins, J., Peters, R. W., Schwartz, A. B., Shen, E. N., Bhandari, A., Scheinman, M. M., & Sauvé, M. J.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Morady, Fred
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-09
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
587-591
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059208803
Cited by
138
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
bundle branch block, unexplained syncope, electrophysiologic testing, programmed ventricular stimulation, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, permanent pacemaker, antiarrhythmic drugs, sudden death, recurrent syncope, quinidine
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bundle-Branch Block, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Child, Death, Sudden, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pacemaker, Artificial, Syncope, Tachycardia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review