Cited by 737

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The oligodendrocyte and its many cellular processes

PFEIFFER, S, WARRINGTON, A, BANSAL, R·1993·Trends in Cell Biology

Abstract

The oligodendrocyte (OL) is increasingly providing a model system for probing central issues of cell biology. During development, OL progenitors undergo controlled migration, proliferation and differentiation, secrete and respond to a number of growth factors, and dramatically change their cellular architecture, culminating in the formation of the myelin sheath. This review examines some facets of the OL that make it an especially attractive tool for studying many basic questions in cell biology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90213-k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 737

Metadata

Authors
PFEIFFER, S., WARRINGTON, A., & BANSAL, R.
Venue
Trends in Cell Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-06
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
191-197
ISSN
0962-8924
Cited by
737
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review