Cited by 174Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyErgonomics and Human FactorsUsability and User Interface Design

Cockpit Automation

Wiener, Earl L.·1988·Human Factors in Aviation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-08-057090-7.50019-9

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The horizontal situation indicator has been credited with reducing pilot workload more than any other automated system in the cockpit.

    “This, more than any other automated system in the cockpit, has been credited with reducing the workload of the pilot [50].”
  • Automation can increase workload, mostly in systems where automation is difficult to initiate and engage, increasing both cognitive and physical workload.

    “Instances of automation increasing workload have also been found [8], [50]. These mostly involve systems in which the automation is difficult to initiate and engage, thus increasing both cognitive workload [51] and if extensive data entry is required, the physical workload of the operator.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiener, E. L.
Corresponding author
Wiener, Earl L.
Venue
Human Factors in Aviation
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1988
Pages
433-461
OpenAlex
W3021317255
Cited by
174
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.71
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ergonomics and Human Factors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
cockpit automation, human-machine interaction, human factors, pilot-automation interaction, automation reliability, aircraft automation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review