Cited by 3Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere and Its Response to Biochar Augmentation

Orr, C.H., Ralebitso-Senior, T. Komang, Prior, S.·2016·Biochar Application

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-803433-0.00008-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Ahemad, 2014, Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 26, 1, 10.1016/j.jksus.2013.05.001 · DOI
  2. Alburquerque, 2013, Enhanced wheat yield by biochar addition under different mineral fertilization levels, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 33, 475, 10.1007/s13593-012-0128-3 · DOI
  3. Anderson, 2011, Biochar induced soil microbial community change: implications for biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus, Pedobiologia, 54, 309, 10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Arbestain, 2014, Environmental benefits and risks of biochar application to soil, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 191, 1, 10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.014 · DOI
  5. Atkinson, 2010, Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review, Plant Soil, 337, 1, 10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Blagodatskaya, 2014, Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in the rhizosphere and root-free soil, PLos One, 9, 4, 10.1371/journal.pone.0093282 · DOI
  7. Cernansky, 2015, Agriculture: state-of-the-art soil, Nature, 517, 258, 10.1038/517258a · DOI
  8. Clough, 2010, Unweathered wood biochar impact on nitrous oxide emissions from a bovine-urine-amended pasture soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 74, 852, 10.2136/sssaj2009.0185 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cook, 1995, Molecular mechanisms of defense by rhizobacteria against root disease, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 92, 4197, 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4197 · DOI
  10. Daly, 2015, Assessing the influence of the rhizosphere on soil hydraulic properties using X-ray computed tomography and numerical modelling, J. Exp. Bot., 66, 2305, 10.1093/jxb/eru509 · DOI
  11. Dias, 2012, Abundance and genetic diversity of nifH gene sequences in anthopogenically affected Brazilian mangrove sediments, App. Environ. Microbiol., 78, 7960, 10.1128/AEM.02273-12 · DOI
  12. du Plessis, 1998, Growth kinetics of microbial colonisation of porous media, S. Afr. J. Sci., 94, 33
  13. Ducey, 2013, Addition of activated switchgrass biochar to an acidic subsoil increases microbial nitrogen cycling gene abundances, Appl. Soil Ecol., 65, 65, 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ennis, 2012, Biochar: carbon sequestration, land remediation and impacts on soil microbiology, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 2311, 10.1080/10643389.2011.574115 · DOI
  15. Fernández-Calvino, 2010, Growth Repsonse of the bacterial community to pH in soils differing in pH, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol, 73, 149
  16. Fierer, 2006, The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities, PNAS, 105, 628
  17. Filiberto, 2013, Practicality of Biochar Additions to Enhance Soil and Crop Productivity, Agriculture, 3, 715, 10.3390/agriculture3040715 · DOI
  18. Fitter, 2005, Biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil, Funct. Ecol., 19, 369, 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00969.x · DOI
  19. Gaskin, 2010, Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield, Agron. J., 102, 623, 10.2134/agronj2009.0083 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Graber, 2010, Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media, Plant Soil, 337, 481, 10.1007/s11104-010-0544-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hockaday, 2007, The transformation and mobility of charcoal in a fire-impacted watershed, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 71, 3432, 10.1016/j.gca.2007.02.023 · DOI
  22. Ippolito, 2012, Environmental benefits of biochar, J. Environ. Qual., 41, 967, 10.2134/jeq2012.0151 · DOI
  23. Jeffery, 2011, A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst, Environ, 144, 175
  24. Jack, 2011, Choice of organic amendments in tomato transplants has lasting effects on bacterial rhizosphere communities and crop performance in the field, Appl. Soil Ecol., 48, 94, 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.01.003 · DOI
  25. Khodadad, 2011, Taxa-specific changes in soil microbial community composition induced by pyrogenic carbon amendments, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 385, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.005 · DOI
  26. Kolton, 2011, Impact of biochar application to soil on the root-associated bacterial community structure of fully developed greenhouse pepper plants, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 77, 4924, 10.1128/AEM.00148-11 · DOI
  27. Lal, 2009, Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 60, 158, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01114.x · DOI
  28. Lauber, 2008, The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types, Soil. Biol. Biochem, 40, 2407, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.021 · DOI
  29. Lehmann, 2008, Spatial complexity of soil organic matter forms at nanometre scales, Nature Geosci., 1, 238, 10.1038/ngeo155 · DOI
  30. Lehmann, 2011, Biochar effects on soil biota: a review, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 1812, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Li, 2014, Functional potential of soil microbial communities in the maize rhizosphere, PLoS One, 9, e112609, 10.1371/journal.pone.0112609 · DOI
  32. Lin, 2015, Effects of biochar application on greenhouse gas emissions, carbon sequestration and crop growth in coastal saline soil, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 329, 10.1111/ejss.12225 · DOI
  33. Lugtenberg, 2009, Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 63, 541, 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · DOI
  34. Marschner, 2004, Development of specific rhizosphere bacterial communities in relation to plant species, nutrition and soil type, Plant Soil, 261, 199, 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000035569.80747.c5 · DOI
  35. Mavi, 2013, Salinity affects the response of soil microbial activity and biomass to addition of carbon and nitrogen, Soil Res., 51, 68, 10.1071/SR12191 · DOI
  36. Mendes, 2011, Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria, Science, 332, 1097, 10.1126/science.1203980 · DOI
  37. Mendes, 2013, The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 37, 634, 10.1111/1574-6976.12028 · DOI
  38. Molina, 2009, Reducing abrupt climate change risk using the Montreal protocol and other regulatory actions to complement cuts in CO2 emissions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 106, 20616, 10.1073/pnas.0902568106 · DOI
  39. Nallanchakravarthula, 2014, Influence of soil type, cultivar and Verticillium dahliae on the structure of the root and rhizosphere soil fungal microbiome of strawberry, PLoS One, 9, e111455, 10.1371/journal.pone.0111455 · DOI
  40. Nelissen, 2014, Effect of different biochar and fertilizer types on N2O and NO emissions, Soil Biol. Biochem., 70, 244, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.12.026 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Nguyen, 2009, Black carbon decomposition under varying water regimes, Org. Geochem., 40, 846, 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Ofek-Lalzar, 2014, Niche and host-associated functional signatures of the root surface microbiome, Nat. Comm., 5, 4950, 10.1038/ncomms5950 · DOI
  43. Olakanye, 2014, Changes to soil bacterial profiles as a result of Sus scrofa domesticus decomposition, Forensic. Sci. Int., 245, 101, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.002 · DOI
  44. O’Neil, 2009, Bacterial community composition in Brazilian Anthrosols and adjacent soils characterized using culturing and molecular identification, Microb. Ecol., 58, 23, 10.1007/s00248-009-9515-y · DOI
  45. Orr, 2012, Impacts of Organic and Conventional Crop Management on Diversity and Activity of Free-Living Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria are Subsidiary to Temporal Effects, PLos One, 7, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0052891 · DOI
  46. Orr, 2014, Tracking N-cycling genes in biochar-supplemented ecosystems: a perspective, OA Microbiol., 2, 1
  47. Pietikainen, 2000, Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effects on the microbial community of the underlying humus, Oikos, 89, 231, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890203.x · DOI
  48. Prendergast-Miller, 2011, Localisation of nitrate in the rhizosphere of biochar-amended soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 2243, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.019 · DOI
  49. Prendergast-Miller, 2014, Biochar–root interactions are mediated by biochar nutrient content and impacts on soil nutrient availability, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 65, 173, 10.1111/ejss.12079 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Quilliam, 2013, Life in the ‘charosphere’ – does biochar in agricultural soil provide a significant habitat for microorganisms?, Soil Biol. Biochem., 65, 287, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.06.004 · DOI
  51. Rutigliano, 2014, Effect of biochar addition on soil microbial community in a wheat crop, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 60, 476, 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.10.007 · DOI
  52. Sarathchandra, 2001, Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 33, 953, 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00245-5 · DOI
  53. Shen, 2012, Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China, J. Exp. Bot., 64, 1181, 10.1093/jxb/ers342 · DOI
  54. Singh, 2004, Unravelling rhizosphere–microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations, Trends Microbiol., 12, 386, 10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.008 · DOI
  55. Spokas, 2012, Biochar: A synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration, J. Environ. Qual., 41, 973, 10.2134/jeq2011.0069 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Steinbeiss, 2009, Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity, Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 1301, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.016 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Troy, 2013, Impact of biochar addition to soil on greenhouse gas emissions following pig manure application, Soil Biol. Biochem., 60, 173, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.019 · DOI
  58. Wang, 2013, Insight into the effects of biochar on manure composting: evidence supporting the relationship between N2O emissions and denitrifying community, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7341, 10.1021/es305293h · DOI
  59. Woolf, 2010, Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change, Nat. Commun., 1
  60. Zhang, 2010, Effect of Biochar Amendment on Yield and Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Rice Paddy from Tai Lake Plain, China, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 139, 469, 10.1016/j.agee.2010.09.003 · DOI
  61. Zhao, 2014, Microbial mediation of biogeochemical cycles revealed by simulation of global changes with soil transplant and cropping, ISME, 8, 2045, 10.1038/ismej.2014.46 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Orr, C. H., Ralebitso-Senior, T. K., & Prior, S.
Affiliations
Teesside University (GB)
Venue
Biochar Application
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2016
Pages
199-220
OpenAlex
W2407631528
Cited by
3
References
5
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
biochar, rhizosphere, soil microbial communities, microbial community structure, red clover, clover, soil nitrogen cycling, crop growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review