Cited by 850Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesPlant Growth Enhancement Techniques

Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media

Graber, Ellen R., Meller Harel, Yael, Kolton, Max, Cytryn, Eddie, Silber, Avner, Rav David, Dalia, Tsechansky, Ludmilla, Borenshtein, Menahem +1 more·2010·Plant and Soil

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11104-010-0544-6

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pepper plant growth (i.e., leaf area, canopy dry weight, number of nodes, and yields of buds, flowers and fruit) in the biochar-treated pots was significantly enhanced by biochar application at a level of 1-5% by weight.

    “Also, Graber et al. (2010) have reported that pepper plant growth (i.e., leaf area, canopy dry weight, number of nodes, and yields of buds, flowers and fruit) in the biochar-treated pots was significantly enhanced by biochar application at a level of 1À5% by weight, and with mustard chicken manure-derived biochar increased plant dry biomass by 353 and 572% for shoot and root, respectively with 1%”

    From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Graber et al., 2010

  • Mustard chicken manure-derived biochar increased plant dry biomass by 353 and 572% for shoot and root, respectively with 1% of biochar addition.

    “and with mustard chicken manure-derived biochar increased plant dry biomass by 353 and 572% for shoot and root, respectively with 1% of biochar addition.”

    From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Graber et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graber, E. R., Meller Harel, Y., Kolton, M., Cytryn, E., Silber, A., Rav David, D., Tsechansky, L., Borenshtein, M., & Elad, Y.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
Venue
Plant and Soil
Published
2010-09-02
Volume
337
Issue
1-2
Pages
481-496
ISSN
  • 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5036
OpenAlex
W1984787867
Cited by
850
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 22
FWCI
37.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
Keywords
biochar, pepper, tomato, Capsicum annuum, soilless growing media, coconut fiber, tuff, fertigation, rhizosphere microbiome, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, plant growth-promoting fungi, biological control agents, plant growth, fruit yield, hormesis, phytotoxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review