Cited by 420Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Biochar–root interactions are mediated by biochar nutrient content and impacts on soil nutrient availability

Prendergast‐Miller, M. T., Duvall, M., Sohi, S. P.·2014·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary Roots are the first point of contact between biochar particles and growing plants, yet detailed studies of biochar–root interactions are few. Biochar may affect root growth, and therefore plant performance, through two mechanisms: (i) as a direct nutrient source and (ii) through impacts on nutrient availability. To test the hypothesis that biochar–root interactions occur and are determined by biochar nutrient supply and impacts on soil nutrients, spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L .) was grown with and without biochar addition in rhizobox mesocosms. Biochar from unaltered and artificially weathered Miscanthus or willow ( Salix sp) biochar types was used and was manipulated to alter its structure and nutrient content. After 28 days of plant growth, biochar nutrient content, soil nutrient content and the amount of biochar were measured in the bulk soil, the rhizosphere and the rhizosheath. Plants in biochar‐amended soils had larger rhizosphere zones than the control treatment. The rhizosphere contained more biochar particles than the bulk soil, an indication that roots preferred soil containing biochar particles. Biochar particles retained soil nitrogen ( N ) in the form of nitrate, and also supplied phosphorus ( P ) to the soil and plant. Miscanthus biochar had a larger extractable P content than the Salix biochar, with different effects on plant growth and root responses. Although artificial physical weathering had no effect on overall plant growth, weathering effects on N retention and P content were dependent on biochar type. Our results indicate that roots are attracted towards biochar, resulting in its partitioning between bulk and rhizosphere soil. Biochar thus controls plant root nutrient acquisition directly as a nutrient source and indirectly by altering soil nutrient content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ejss.12079

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prendergast‐Miller, M. T., Duvall, M., & Sohi, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Prendergast‐Miller, M. T.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-04
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
173-185
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2116284427
Cited by
420
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
28.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Scottish Funding Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Interreg
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
soil nutrient availability, rhizosphere, rhizosheath, root growth, spring barley, nitrogen retention, phosphorus availability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review