Cited by 282Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Unweathered wood biochar impact on nitrous oxide emissions from a bovine-urine-amended pasture soil

Open access
Clough, T.J., Bertram, J.E., Ray, J.L., Condron, L.M., O'Callaghan, M., Sherlock, R.R., Wells, N.S.·2010·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Low‐temperature pyrolysis of biomass produces a product known as biochar The incorporation of this material into the soil has been advocated as a C sequestration method. Biochar also has the potential to influence the soil N cycle by altering nitrification rates and by adsorbing or NH 3 Biochar can be incorporated into the soil during renovation of intensively managed pasture soils. These managed pastures are a significant source of N 2 O, a greenhouse gas, produced in ruminant urine patches. We hypothesized that biochar effects on the N cycle could reduce the soil inorganic‐N pool available for N 2 O‐producing mechanisms. A laboratory study was performed to examine the effect of biochar incorporation into soil (20 Mg ha −1 ) on N 2 O‐N and NH 3 –N fluxes, and inorganic‐N transformations, following the application of bovine urine (760 kg N ha −1 ). Treatments included controls (soil only and soil plus biochar), and two urine treatments (soil plus urine and soil plus biochar plus urine). Fluxes of N 2 O from the biochar plus urine treatment were generally higher than from urine alone during the first 30 d, but after 50 d there was no significant difference ( P = 0.11) in terms of cumulative N 2 O‐N emitted as a percentage of the urine N applied during the 53‐d period; however, NH 3 –N fluxes were enhanced by approximately 3% of the N applied in the biochar plus urine treatment compared with the urine‐only treatment after 17 d. Soil inorganic‐N pools differed between treatments, with higher concentrations in the presence of biochar, indicative of lower rates of nitrification. The inorganic‐N pool available for N 2 O‐producing mechanisms was not reduced, however, by adding biochar.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2009.0185

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Volatile organic compounds associated with a biochar or ethylene production can decrease nitrification activity.

    “Volatile organic compounds associated with a biochar or ethylene production can decrease nitrification activity [62,64].”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Discussion says biochar contained VOCs, notes reported inhibition of the nitrifier Nitrosomonas by α-pinene, and describes a possible short-term slowing of ammonium oxidation. It does not address ethylene production or establish that the biochar’s VOCs caused the slowing. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other studies have found no differences or even increases in cumulative N2O emissions after biochar addition.

    “while other studies have found no differences or even increases in cumulative N 2 O emissions after biochar addition [61-63].”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. In S. Solomon et al. (ed.) Climate change 2007: Th e Physical Basis. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
  2. Hewitt, A.E. 1998. New Zealand soil classifi cation. 2nd ed. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, NZ.
  3. Rondon, M., J.A. Ramirez, and J. Lehmann. 2005. Charcoal additions reduce net emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. p. 208. In Proc. USDA Symp. on Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry, 3rd, Baltimore, MD. 21-24 Mar. 2005. Univ. of Delaware, Baltimore.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clough, T. J., Bertram, J. E., Ray, J. L., Condron, L. M., O'Callaghan, M., Sherlock, R. R., & Wells, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
  • AgResearch Private Bag 4749 Lincoln New Zealand
Corresponding author
Clough, T.J.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
852-860
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W1976597217
Cited by
282
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 25
FWCI
38.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lincoln University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
biochar, nitrous oxide emissions, ammonia volatilization, bovine urine, pasture soils, nitrification, soil nitrogen cycling, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, carbon sequestration, low-temperature pyrolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review