Cited by 18Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesSchool Choice and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Behavioral economics and nudging in education: evidence from the field

Damgaard, Mette Trier, Nielsen, Helena Skyt·2020·The Economics of Education

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-815391-8.00002-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Akerlof, 2002, Identity and schooling: Some lessons for the economics of education, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 1167, 10.1257/.40.4.1167 · DOI
  2. Allcott, 2019, The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11, 236
  3. Ariely, 2002, Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment, Psychological Science, 13, 219, 10.1111/1467-9280.00441 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Aronson, 2002, Reducing stereotype threat and boosting academic achievement of African-American students: The role of conceptions of intelligence, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113, 10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bandiera, 2015, Blissful ignorance? A natural experiment on the effect of feedback on students' performance, Labour Economics, 34, 13, 10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.002 · DOI
  6. Benabou, 2002, Self-confidence and personal motivation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 871, 10.1162/003355302760193913 · DOI
  7. Bergman, 2019, Parent‒child information frictions and human capital investment: Evidence from a field experiment, Journal of Political Economy
  8. Bettinger, 2012, The role of application assistance and information in college decision: Results from the H&R block FAFSA experiment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 1205, 10.1093/qje/qjs017 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bettinger, 2018, Increasing perseverance in math: Evidence from a field experiment in Norway, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 146, 1, 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.032 · DOI
  10. Blackwell, 2007, Implicit theories of intelligence predict student achievement across adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention, Child Development, 78, 246, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Broda, 2018, Reducing inequality in academic success for incoming college students: A randomized trial of growth mindset and belonging interventions. 2018, Journal of Research of Educational Effectiveness, 11, 317, 10.1080/19345747.2018.1429037 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Burger, 2011, Field and online experiments on self-control, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77, 393, 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.11.010 · DOI
  13. Bursztyn, 2012, The schooling decision: Family preferences, intergenerational conflict, and moral hazard in the Brazilian Favelas, Journal of Political Economy, 120, 359, 10.1086/666746 · DOI
  14. Bursztyn, 2015, How does peer pressure affect educational investments?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 1329, 10.1093/qje/qjv021 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Carrell, 2009, Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement, Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 439, 10.1086/600143 · DOI
  16. Carrell, 2017, Why do college going interventions work?, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9, 124
  17. Carrell, 2013, From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation, Econometrica, 81, 855, 10.3982/ECTA10168 · DOI
  18. Castleman, 2017, Parental influences on postsecondary decision making: Evidence from a text messaging experiment, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 361, 10.3102/0162373716687393 · DOI
  19. Coffman, 2017, Can social information affect what job you choose and keep?, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9, 96
  20. De Paola, 2011, Frequency of examinations and student achievement in a randomized experiment, Economics of Education Review, 30, 1416, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.009 · DOI
  21. De Paola, 2015, Procrastination, academic success and the effectiveness of a remedial program, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 217, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.007 · DOI
  22. DellaVigna, 2009, Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field, Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 315, 10.1257/jel.47.2.315 · DOI
  23. Dinkelman, 2014, Investing in schooling in Chile: The role of information about financial aid for higher education, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 96, 244, 10.1162/REST_a_00384 · DOI
  24. Dobronyi, 2019, Goal setting, academic reminders, and college success: A large-scale field experiment, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12, 38, 10.1080/19345747.2018.1517849 · DOI
  25. Dweck, 1986, Motivational processes affecting learning, American Psychologist, 41, 1040, 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Fryer, 2016, Information, non-financial incentives, and student achievement: Evidence from a text messaging experiment, Journal of Public Economics, 144, 109, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.10.009 · DOI
  27. Gehlbach, 2016, Creating birds of similar feathers: Leveraging similarity to improve teacher‒student relationships and academic achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 342, 10.1037/edu0000042 · DOI
  28. Harackiewicz, 2012, Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention, Psychological Science, 23, 899, 10.1177/0956797611435530 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hastings, 2008, Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1373, 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1373 · DOI
  30. Jabbar, 2011, The behavioral economics of education: New directions for research, Educational Researcher, 40, 446, 10.3102/0013189X11426351 · DOI
  31. Jalava, 2015, Grades and rank: Impacts of non-financial incentives on test-performance, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 151, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.004 · DOI
  32. Jensen, 2010, The (perceived) returns to education and the demand for schooling, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 515, 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.515 · DOI
  33. Kahneman, 1991, Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193, 10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Karlan, 2016, Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving, Management Science, 62, 3393, 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2296 · DOI
  35. Kizilcec, 2014, Encouraging forum participation in online courses with collectivist, individualist and neutral motivational framings, eLearning Papers, 37, 13
  36. Koch, 2011, Self-regulation through goal setting, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113, 305, 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2010.01641.x · DOI
  37. Koch, 2015, Behavioral economics of education, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 3, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.09.005 · DOI
  38. Kraft, 2017, Can schools enable parents to prevent summer learning loss? A text messaging field experiment to promote literacy skills, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 674, 85, 10.1177/0002716217732009 · DOI
  39. Laibson, 1997, Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443, 10.1162/003355397555253 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Lavecchia, 2016, Behavioral economics of education: Progress and possibilities, Vol. 5, 1
  41. Levitt, 2016, The behaviouralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve economic performance, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8, 183
  42. Lin-Siegler, 2016, Even Einstein struggled: Effects of learning about great scientists struggles on high school students' motivation to learn science, Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 314, 10.1037/edu0000092 · DOI
  43. Marx, 2019, Student loan nudges: Experimental evidence on borrowing and educational attainment, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11, 108
  44. Mayer, 2019, Using behavioral insights to increase parental engagement: The parents and children together (PACT) intervention, Journal of Human Resources, 10.3368/jhr.54.4.0617.8835R · DOI
  45. McEvoy, 2016, Loss aversion and student achievement, Economics Bulletin, 36, 1762
  46. Morisano, 2010, Setting, elaborating, and reflecting on personal goals improves academic performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 255, 10.1037/a0018478 · DOI
  47. Oreopoulos, 2018, Student coaching: How far can technology go?, Journal of Human Resources, 53, 299, 10.3368/jhr.53.2.1216-8439R · DOI
  48. Peter, 2017, Intended college enrollment and educational inequality: Do students lack information?, Economics of Education Review, 60, 125, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.08.002 · DOI
  49. Pistolesi, 2017, The effect of advising students at college entrance: Evidence from a French university reform, Labour Economics, 44, 106, 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.12.002 · DOI
  50. Rogers, 2016, Discouraged by peer excellence: Exposure to exemplary peer performance causes quitting, Psychological Science, 27, 365, 10.1177/0956797615623770 · DOI
  51. Rogers, 2018, Reducing student absences at scale by targeting parents' misbeliefs, Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 335, 10.1038/s41562-018-0328-1 · DOI
  52. Tuckman, 1998, Using tests as an incentive to motivate procrastinators to study, The Journal of Experimental Education, 66, 141, 10.1080/00220979809601400 · DOI
  53. Wilson, 1982, Improving the academic performance of college freshmen: Attribution therapy revisited, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 367, 10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.367 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Yeager, 2016, Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, E3341, 10.1073/pnas.1524360113 · DOI
  55. Alan, 2018, Fostering patience in the classroom: Results from a randomized educational intervention, Journal of Political Economy, 126, 1865, 10.1086/699007 · DOI
  56. Austen-Smith, 2005, An economic analysis of ‘acting white’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 551
  57. Benabou, 2006, Incentives and prosocial behavior, The American Economic Review, 96, 1652, 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Benhassine, 2015, Turning a shove into a nudge? A ‘labelled cash transfer’ for education, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 86
  59. Cadena, 2015, Human capital and lifetime costs of impatience, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 126
  60. Damgaard, 2018, Nudging in education, Economics of Education Review, 64, 313, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Madrian, 2001, The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149, 10.1162/003355301753265543 · DOI
  62. Mischel, 1989, Delay of gratification in children, Science, 244, 281, 10.1126/science.2658056 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Damgaard, M. T., & Nielsen, H. S.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
The Economics of Education
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2020
Pages
21-35
OpenAlex
W3000734370
Cited by
18
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
nudging, behavioral economics, educational decision-making, behavioral barriers, self-control, cognitive limitations, attentional limitations, loss aversion, default bias, social preferences, biased beliefs, student choice, parental decision-making, teacher decision-making, nudging interventions, intervention effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review