The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Behavioral economics and nudging in education: evidence from the field
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Learning is an effortful task and students exhibit a present bias which makes them prefer immediate gratification over exerting effort for learning in anticipation of future rewards (Lavecchia et al. 2016, Damgaard and Nielsen 2020).”
From AI Meets the Classroom: When Do Large Language Models Harm Learning? (2024) · cites this paper as Damgaard and Nielsen 2020
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 18
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Akerlof, 2002, Identity and schooling: Some lessons for the economics of education, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 1167, 10.1257/.40.4.1167 · DOI
- Allcott, 2019, The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11, 236
- Ariely, 2002, Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment, Psychological Science, 13, 219, 10.1111/1467-9280.00441 · DOI · Paper page
- Aronson, 2002, Reducing stereotype threat and boosting academic achievement of African-American students: The role of conceptions of intelligence, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113, 10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 · DOI · Paper page
- Bandiera, 2015, Blissful ignorance? A natural experiment on the effect of feedback on students' performance, Labour Economics, 34, 13, 10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.002 · DOI
- Benabou, 2002, Self-confidence and personal motivation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 871, 10.1162/003355302760193913 · DOI
- Bergman, 2019, Parent‒child information frictions and human capital investment: Evidence from a field experiment, Journal of Political Economy
- Bettinger, 2012, The role of application assistance and information in college decision: Results from the H&R block FAFSA experiment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 1205, 10.1093/qje/qjs017 · DOI · Paper page
- Bettinger, 2018, Increasing perseverance in math: Evidence from a field experiment in Norway, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 146, 1, 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.032 · DOI
- Blackwell, 2007, Implicit theories of intelligence predict student achievement across adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention, Child Development, 78, 246, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x · DOI · Paper page
- Broda, 2018, Reducing inequality in academic success for incoming college students: A randomized trial of growth mindset and belonging interventions. 2018, Journal of Research of Educational Effectiveness, 11, 317, 10.1080/19345747.2018.1429037 · DOI · Paper page
- Burger, 2011, Field and online experiments on self-control, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77, 393, 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.11.010 · DOI
- Bursztyn, 2012, The schooling decision: Family preferences, intergenerational conflict, and moral hazard in the Brazilian Favelas, Journal of Political Economy, 120, 359, 10.1086/666746 · DOI
- Bursztyn, 2015, How does peer pressure affect educational investments?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 1329, 10.1093/qje/qjv021 · DOI · Paper page
- Carrell, 2009, Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement, Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 439, 10.1086/600143 · DOI
- Carrell, 2017, Why do college going interventions work?, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9, 124
- Carrell, 2013, From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation, Econometrica, 81, 855, 10.3982/ECTA10168 · DOI
- Castleman, 2017, Parental influences on postsecondary decision making: Evidence from a text messaging experiment, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 361, 10.3102/0162373716687393 · DOI
- Coffman, 2017, Can social information affect what job you choose and keep?, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9, 96
- De Paola, 2011, Frequency of examinations and student achievement in a randomized experiment, Economics of Education Review, 30, 1416, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.009 · DOI
- De Paola, 2015, Procrastination, academic success and the effectiveness of a remedial program, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 217, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.007 · DOI
- DellaVigna, 2009, Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field, Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 315, 10.1257/jel.47.2.315 · DOI
- Dinkelman, 2014, Investing in schooling in Chile: The role of information about financial aid for higher education, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 96, 244, 10.1162/REST_a_00384 · DOI
- Dobronyi, 2019, Goal setting, academic reminders, and college success: A large-scale field experiment, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12, 38, 10.1080/19345747.2018.1517849 · DOI
- Dweck, 1986, Motivational processes affecting learning, American Psychologist, 41, 1040, 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040 · DOI · Paper page
- Fryer, 2016, Information, non-financial incentives, and student achievement: Evidence from a text messaging experiment, Journal of Public Economics, 144, 109, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.10.009 · DOI
- Gehlbach, 2016, Creating birds of similar feathers: Leveraging similarity to improve teacher‒student relationships and academic achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 342, 10.1037/edu0000042 · DOI
- Harackiewicz, 2012, Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention, Psychological Science, 23, 899, 10.1177/0956797611435530 · DOI · Paper page
- Hastings, 2008, Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1373, 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1373 · DOI
- Jabbar, 2011, The behavioral economics of education: New directions for research, Educational Researcher, 40, 446, 10.3102/0013189X11426351 · DOI
- Jalava, 2015, Grades and rank: Impacts of non-financial incentives on test-performance, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 151, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.004 · DOI
- Jensen, 2010, The (perceived) returns to education and the demand for schooling, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 515, 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.515 · DOI
- Kahneman, 1991, Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193, 10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · DOI · Paper page
- Karlan, 2016, Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving, Management Science, 62, 3393, 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2296 · DOI
- Kizilcec, 2014, Encouraging forum participation in online courses with collectivist, individualist and neutral motivational framings, eLearning Papers, 37, 13
- Koch, 2011, Self-regulation through goal setting, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113, 305, 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2010.01641.x · DOI
- Koch, 2015, Behavioral economics of education, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 3, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.09.005 · DOI
- Kraft, 2017, Can schools enable parents to prevent summer learning loss? A text messaging field experiment to promote literacy skills, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 674, 85, 10.1177/0002716217732009 · DOI
- Laibson, 1997, Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443, 10.1162/003355397555253 · DOI · Paper page
- Lavecchia, 2016, Behavioral economics of education: Progress and possibilities, Vol. 5, 1
- Levitt, 2016, The behaviouralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve economic performance, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8, 183
- Lin-Siegler, 2016, Even Einstein struggled: Effects of learning about great scientists struggles on high school students' motivation to learn science, Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 314, 10.1037/edu0000092 · DOI
- Marx, 2019, Student loan nudges: Experimental evidence on borrowing and educational attainment, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11, 108
- Mayer, 2019, Using behavioral insights to increase parental engagement: The parents and children together (PACT) intervention, Journal of Human Resources, 10.3368/jhr.54.4.0617.8835R · DOI
- McEvoy, 2016, Loss aversion and student achievement, Economics Bulletin, 36, 1762
- Morisano, 2010, Setting, elaborating, and reflecting on personal goals improves academic performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 255, 10.1037/a0018478 · DOI
- Oreopoulos, 2018, Student coaching: How far can technology go?, Journal of Human Resources, 53, 299, 10.3368/jhr.53.2.1216-8439R · DOI
- Peter, 2017, Intended college enrollment and educational inequality: Do students lack information?, Economics of Education Review, 60, 125, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.08.002 · DOI
- Pistolesi, 2017, The effect of advising students at college entrance: Evidence from a French university reform, Labour Economics, 44, 106, 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.12.002 · DOI
- Rogers, 2016, Discouraged by peer excellence: Exposure to exemplary peer performance causes quitting, Psychological Science, 27, 365, 10.1177/0956797615623770 · DOI
- Rogers, 2018, Reducing student absences at scale by targeting parents' misbeliefs, Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 335, 10.1038/s41562-018-0328-1 · DOI
- Tuckman, 1998, Using tests as an incentive to motivate procrastinators to study, The Journal of Experimental Education, 66, 141, 10.1080/00220979809601400 · DOI
- Wilson, 1982, Improving the academic performance of college freshmen: Attribution therapy revisited, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 367, 10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.367 · DOI · Paper page
- Yeager, 2016, Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, E3341, 10.1073/pnas.1524360113 · DOI
- Alan, 2018, Fostering patience in the classroom: Results from a randomized educational intervention, Journal of Political Economy, 126, 1865, 10.1086/699007 · DOI
- Austen-Smith, 2005, An economic analysis of ‘acting white’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 551
- Benabou, 2006, Incentives and prosocial behavior, The American Economic Review, 96, 1652, 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652 · DOI · Paper page
- Benhassine, 2015, Turning a shove into a nudge? A ‘labelled cash transfer’ for education, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 86
- Cadena, 2015, Human capital and lifetime costs of impatience, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 126
- Damgaard, 2018, Nudging in education, Economics of Education Review, 64, 313, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Madrian, 2001, The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149, 10.1162/003355301753265543 · DOI
- Mischel, 1989, Delay of gratification in children, Science, 244, 281, 10.1126/science.2658056 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Damgaard, M. T., & Nielsen, H. S.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Venue
- The Economics of Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 21-35
- OpenAlex
- W3000734370
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- nudging, behavioral economics, educational decision-making, behavioral barriers, self-control, cognitive limitations, attentional limitations, loss aversion, default bias, social preferences, biased beliefs, student choice, parental decision-making, teacher decision-making, nudging interventions, intervention effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review