CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Journalism and Media StudiesDigital Platforms and EconomicsMedia Influence and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Newspapers and Magazines

Chandra, Ambarish, Kaiser, Ulrich·2015·Handbook of Media Economics
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-444-62721-6.00009-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-62721-6.00009-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. Anderson, 2005, Market provision of broadcasting: a welfare analysis, Rev. Econ. Stud., 72, 947, 10.1111/0034-6527.00357 · DOI
  2. Anderson, 2012, Media mergers and media bias with rational consumers, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 10, 831, 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01069.x · DOI
  3. Argentesi, 2007, Estimating market power in a two-sided market: the case of newspapers, J. Appl. Econ., 22, 1247, 10.1002/jae.997 · DOI
  4. Armstrong, 2006, Competition in two-sided markets, RAND J. Econ., 37, 668, 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Asplund, 2005, Prices, margins and liquidity constraints: Swedish newspapers, 1990–1992, Economica, 72, 349, 10.1111/j.0013-0427.2005.00418.x · DOI
  6. Asplund, 2008, Price discrimination in oligopoly: evidence from regional newspapers, J. Ind. Econ., 56, 333, 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2008.00343.x · DOI
  7. Barsh, 1999, Beyond print: a future for magazines, McKinsey Q., 3, 122
  8. Barsh, 2001, Magazines’ home companion, McKinsey Q., 2, 83
  9. Berry, 2010, Product quality and market size, J. Ind. Econ., 58, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00404.x · DOI
  10. Blair, 1993, Pricing decisions of the newspaper monopolist, South. Econ. J., 59, 721, 10.2307/1059734 · DOI
  11. Bucklin, 1989, Games of survival in the US newspaper industry, Appl. Econ., 21, 631, 10.1080/758524895 · DOI
  12. Capell, 2004, Circulation at the crossroads, Circ. Manag., 19, 30
  13. Cecchetti, 1986, The frequency of price adjustment: a study of the newsstand prices of magazines, J. Econ., 31, 255, 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90061-8 · DOI
  14. Chandra, 2009, Targeted advertising: the role of subscriber characteristics in advertising markets, J. Ind. Econ., 57, 58, 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00370.x · DOI
  15. Chandra, 2009, Mergers in two-sided markets: an application to the Canadian newspaper industry, J. Econ. Manag. Strateg., 18, 1045, 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00237.x · DOI
  16. Chandra, 2014, Targeted advertising in magazine markets and the advent of the Internet, Manag. Sci., 60, 1829, 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1830 · DOI
  17. Chaudhri, 1998, Pricing and efficiency of a circulation industry: the case of newspapers, Inf. Econ. Policy, 10, 59, 10.1016/S0167-6245(97)00030-9 · DOI
  18. Chiang, 2011, Media bias and influence: evidence from newspaper endorsements, Rev. Econ. Stud., 78, 795, 10.1093/restud/rdq037 · DOI
  19. Chiou, 2013, Paywalls and the demand for news, Inf. Econ. Policy, 25, 61, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.03.001 · DOI
  20. Choi, 2006, Broadcast competition and advertising with free entry: Subscription vs. free-to-air, Inf. Econ. Policy, 18, 181, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2005.12.002 · DOI
  21. Corden, 1952, The maximisation of profit by a newspaper firm, Rev. Econ. Stud., 20, 181, 10.2307/2295888 · DOI
  22. Deleersnyder, 2002, How cannibalistic is the Internet channel? A study of the newspaper industry in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Int. J. Res. Mark., 19, 337, 10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00099-X · DOI
  23. Depken, 2004, Audience characteristics and the price of advertising in a circulation industry: evidence from US magazines, Inf. Econ. Policy, 16, 179, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2003.08.001 · DOI
  24. Depken, 2004, Is advertising a good or bad? Evidence from U.S. magazine subscriptions, J. Bus., 77, S61, 10.1086/381519 · DOI
  25. Dertouzos, 1990, Economic effects of media concentration: estimates from a model of the newspaper firm, J. Ind. Econ., 39, 1, 10.2307/2098364 · DOI
  26. Evans, 2012, The antitrust analysis of multi-sided platform businesses, vol. 1
  27. Falck, 2014, E-lections: voting behavior and the Internet, Am. Econ. Rev., 104, 2238, 10.1257/aer.104.7.2238 · DOI
  28. Fan, 2013, Ownership consolidation and product characteristics: a study of the US daily newspaper market, Am. Econ. Rev., 103, 1598, 10.1257/aer.103.5.1598 · DOI
  29. Ferguson, 1983, Daily newspaper advertising rates, local media cross-ownership, J. Law Econ., 26, 635, 10.1086/467052 · DOI
  30. Ferrari, 2012, Vertical control of a distribution network—an empirical analysis of magazines, RAND J. Econ., 43, 26, 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00156.x · DOI
  31. Filistrucchi, 2012, Assessing unilateral effects in a two-sided market: an application to the Dutch daily newspaper market, J. Compet. Law Econ., 8, 297, 10.1093/joclec/nhs012 · DOI
  32. Fu, 2003, Multimarket contact of US newspaper chains: circulation competition and market coordination, Inf. Econ. Policy, 15, 501, 10.1016/S0167-6245(03)00025-8 · DOI
  33. Gabszewicz, 2001, Press advertising and the ascent of the ‘Pensée Unique’, Eur. Econ. Rev., 45, 641, 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00139-8 · DOI
  34. Gabszewicz, 2004, Programming and advertising competition in the broadcasting industry, J. Econ. Manag. Strateg., 13, 657, 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2004.00027.x · DOI
  35. Gabszewicz, 2007, Newspapers’ market shares and the theory of the circulation spiral, Inf. Econ. Policy, 19, 405, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.06.002 · DOI
  36. Gentzkow, 2007, Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: online newspapers, Am. Econ. Rev., 97, 713, 10.1257/aer.97.3.713 · DOI
  37. George, 2007, What's fit to print: the effect of ownership concentration on product variety in daily newspaper markets, Inf. Econ. Policy, 19, 285, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.04.002 · DOI
  38. George, 2008, The Internet and the market for daily newspapers, B. E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy, 8, 1
  39. George, 2012, Aggregators, search and the economics of new media institutions, Inf. Econ. Policy, 24, 40, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.01.005 · DOI
  40. George, 2003, Who affects whom in daily newspaper markets?, J. Polit. Econ., 111, 765, 10.1086/375380 · DOI
  41. George, 2006, The New York Times and the market for local newspapers, Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 435, 10.1257/000282806776157551 · DOI
  42. Goldfarb, 2006, The medium-term effects of unavailability, Quant. Mark. Econ., 4, 143, 10.1007/s11129-006-8128-8 · DOI
  43. Goldfarb, 2011, Advertising bans and the substitutability of online and offline advertising, J. Mark. Res., 48, 207, 10.1509/jmkr.48.2.207 · DOI
  44. Häckner, 2008, Advertising and media market concentration, J. Med. Econ., 21, 79, 10.1080/08997760802069861 · DOI
  45. Halbheer, 2014, Choosing a digital content strategy: how much should be free?, Int. J. Res. Mark., 31, 192, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.10.004 · DOI
  46. Hong, 2007, The recent growth of the Internet and changes in household-level demand for entertainment, Inf. Econ. Policy, 19, 304, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.06.004 · DOI
  47. Joukhadar, 2004, The 8 challenges of digital publishing, Circ. Manag., 19, 24
  48. Jullien, 2009, Advertising, competition and entry in media industries, J. Ind. Econ., 57, 7, 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00368.x · DOI
  49. Kaiser, 2006, Magazines and their companion websites: competing outlet channels?, Rev. Mark. Sci, 4
  50. Kaiser, 2012, Magazine “companion websites” and the demand for newsstand sales and subscriptions, J. Med. Econ., 25, 184, 10.1080/08997764.2012.729545 · DOI
  51. Kaiser, 2009, Do media consumers really dislike advertising? An empirical assessment of the role of advertising in print media markets, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 27, 292, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.09.003 · DOI
  52. Kaiser, 2006, Price structure in two-sided markets: evidence from the magazine industry, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 24, 1, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.06.002 · DOI
  53. Kind, 2007, Competition for viewers and advertisers in a TV oligopoly, J. Med. Econ., 20, 211, 10.1080/08997760701290708 · DOI
  54. Knotek, 2008, Convenient prices, currency, and nominal rigidity: theory with evidence from newspaper prices, J. Monet. Econ., 55, 1303, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.07.009 · DOI
  55. Koschat, 2000, Who wants you when you’re old and poor? Exploring the economics of media pricing, J. Med. Econ., 13, 215, 10.1207/S15327736ME1304_2 · DOI
  56. Koschat, 2000, Audience characteristics and bundling: a hedonic analysis of magazine advertising rates, J. Mark. Res., 39, 262, 10.1509/jmkr.39.2.262.19083 · DOI
  57. Kremhelmer, 2004, Advertising and the screening role of mass media, Inf. Econ. Policy, 20, 107, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.11.003 · DOI
  58. Kroft, 2014, Does online search crowd-out traditional search and improve matching efficiency? Evidence from Craigslist, J. Lab. Econ., 32, 259, 10.1086/673374 · DOI
  59. Merrilees, 1983, Anatomy of a price leadership challenge: an evaluation of pricing strategies in the Australian newspaper industry, J. Ind. Econ., 31, 291, 10.2307/2097889 · DOI
  60. Nicholson, 2001, Cannibals on the web? Don’t you believe it!, Editor Publisher, 134, 1
  61. Oberholzer-Gee, 2007, The effect of file sharing on record sales: an empirical analysis, J. Polit. Econ., 115, 1, 10.1086/511995 · DOI
  62. Oster, 2005, Behavioral biases meet the market: the case of magazine subscription prices, Adv. Econ. Anal. Policy, 5
  63. Pauwels, 2001, Internet marketing the news: leveraging brand equity from marketplace to marketspace, Brand Manag., 8, 303, 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540030 · DOI
  64. Peitz, 2008, Content and advertising in the media: pay-TV versus free-to-air, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 26, 949, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.08.003 · DOI
  65. Petrova, 2011, Newspapers and parties: how advertising revenues created an independent press, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 105, 790, 10.1017/S0003055411000360 · DOI
  66. Reddaway, 1963, The economics of newspapers, Econ. J., 73, 201, 10.2307/2228533 · DOI
  67. Reisinger, 2012, Platform competition for advertisers and users in media markets, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 30, 243, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.10.002 · DOI
  68. Reisinger, 2009, Two-sided markets with pecuniary and participation externalities, J. Ind. Econ., 57, 32, 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00373.x · DOI
  69. Robins, 2001, Newspaper websites seize on a capital idea, Editor Publisher, 134, 3
  70. Rochet, 2003, Platform competition in two-sided markets, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 1, 990, 10.1162/154247603322493212 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Romeo, 2003, Do newspaper JOAs charge monopoly advertising rates?, Rev. Ind. Organ., 22, 121, 10.1023/A:1022920018376 · DOI
  72. Rosse, 1967, Daily newspapers, monopolistic competition, and economies of scale, Am. Econ. Rev., 57, 522
  73. Rosse, 1970, Estimating cost function parameters without using cost data: illustrated methodology, Econometrica, 38, 256, 10.2307/1913008 · DOI
  74. Rosse, 1980, The decline of direct newspaper competition, J. Commun., 30, 65, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01967.x · DOI
  75. Rysman, 2004, Competition between networks: a study of the market for yellow pages, Rev. Econ. Stud., 71, 483, 10.1111/0034-6527.00512 · DOI
  76. Seamans, 2014, Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: the impact of Craigslist on local newspapers, Manag. Sci., 60, 476, 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1785 · DOI
  77. Silk, 2001, The emerging position of the Internet as an advertising medium, Netnomics, 3, 129, 10.1023/A:1011455329830 · DOI
  78. Simon, 2007, The effect of a magazine's free digital content on its print circulation: cannibalization or complementarity?, Inf. Econ. Policy, 19, 344, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.06.001 · DOI
  79. Sonnac, 2000, Readers' attitudes toward press advertising: are they ad-lovers or ad-averse?, J. Med. Econ., 13, 249, 10.1207/S15327736ME1304_4 · DOI
  80. Steiner, 1952, Program patterns and the workability of competition in radio broadcasting, Q. J. Econ., 66, 194, 10.2307/1882942 · DOI
  81. Thompson, 1989, Circulation versus advertiser appeal in the newspaper industry, J. Ind. Econ., 37, 259, 10.2307/2098614 · DOI
  82. Weyl, 2010, A price theory of multi-sided platforms, Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 1642, 10.1257/aer.100.4.1642 · DOI
  83. Willis, 2006, Magazine prices revisited, J. Appl. Econ., 21, 337, 10.1002/jae.836 · DOI
  84. Zentner, 2012, Internet adoption and advertising expenditures on traditional media: an empirical analysis using a panel of countries, J. Econ. Manag. Strateg., 21, 913, 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2012.00355.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chandra, A., & Kaiser, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
ORCID
Venue
Handbook of Media Economics
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2015
Pages
397-444
ISSN
2213-6630 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-444-62721-6.00009-3
OpenAlex
W76953199
Cited by
15
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Handbook of media economics (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
newspaper industry, two-sided markets, print advertising, competition law, newspaper mergers, joint operating agreements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review