CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 92

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effective River Restoration in the 21st Century

Friberg, N., Angelopoulos, N.V., Buijse, A.D., Cowx, I.G., Kail, J., Moe, T.F., Moir, H., O’Hare, M.T., Verdonschot, P.F.M., Wolter, C.·2016·Advances in Ecological Research
DOI 10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.010

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 167

  1. Aarts, 2004, Habitat loss as the main cause of the slow recovery of fish faunas of regulated large rivers in Europe: the transversal floodplain gradient, River Res. Appl., 20, 3, 10.1002/rra.720 · DOI
  2. Adams, 2014, Planning across freshwater and terrestrial realms: cobenefits and tradeoffs between conservation actions, Conserv. Lett., 7, 425, 10.1111/conl.12080 · DOI
  3. Alexander, 2006, Stream restoration in the Upper Midwest, U.S.A, Restor. Ecol., 14, 595, 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00171.x · DOI
  4. Arlinghaus, 2002, Fish recruitment in a canal with intensive navigation: implications for ecosystem management, J. Fish Biol., 61, 1386, 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02484.x · DOI
  5. Baattrup-Pedersen, 2015, Functional trait composition of aquatic plants can serve to disentangle multiple interacting stressors in lowland streams, Sci. Total Environ., 543, 230, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.027 · DOI
  6. Bal, 2011, Trade-off between drag reduction and light interception of macrophytes: comparing five aquatic plants with contrasting morphology, Funct. Ecol., 25, 1197, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01909.x · DOI
  7. Balon, 1975, Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition, J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 32, 821, 10.1139/f75-110 · DOI
  8. Bash, 2002, Stream restoration and enhancement projects: is anyone monitoring?, Environ. Manag., 29, 877, 10.1007/s00267-001-0066-3 · DOI
  9. Beauger, 2006, The distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in a reach of the River Allier (France), in relation to riverbed characteristics, Hydrobiologia, 571, 63, 10.1007/s10750-006-0217-x · DOI
  10. Beche, 2006, Long-term seasonal variation in the biological traits of benthic macroinvertebrates in two Mediterranean-climate streams in California, USA, Freshw. Biol., 51, 56, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01473.x · DOI
  11. Beechie, 2010, Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems, BioScience, 60, 209, 10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.7 · DOI
  12. Bernez, 2007, Changes of Potamogeton pectinatus clumps under variable, artificially flooded river water regimes, Belg. J. Bot., 140, 51
  13. Bernhardt, 2005, Synthesizing US river restoration efforts, Science, 308, 636, 10.1126/science.1109769 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Biggs, 1996, Hydraulic habitat of plants in streams, Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 12, 131, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199603)12:2/3<131::AID-RRR385>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
  15. Biggs, 2002, Taxonomic richness of stream benthic algae: effects of flood disturbance and nutrients, Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 1175, 10.4319/lo.2002.47.4.1175 · DOI
  16. Biggs, 1999, Velocity and sediment disturbance of periphyton in headwater streams: biomass and metabolism, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 18, 222, 10.2307/1468462 · DOI
  17. Bond, 2003, Local habitat restoration in streams: constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota, Ecol. Manag. Restor., 4, 193, 10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00156.x · DOI
  18. Borchardt, 1993, Effects of flow and refugia on drift loss of benthic macroinvertebrates: implications for habitat restoration in lowland streams, Freshw. Biol., 29, 221, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00759.x · DOI
  19. Borgström, 2016, Funding ecological restoration policy in practice—patterns of short-termism and regional biases, Land Use Policy, 52, 439, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.004 · DOI
  20. Bornette, 2011, Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review, Aquat. Sci., 73, 1, 10.1007/s00027-010-0162-7 · DOI
  21. Bryce, 2010, Protecting sediment-sensitive aquatic species in mountain streams through the application of biologically based streambed sediment criteria, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 29, 657, 10.1899/09-061.1 · DOI
  22. Buijse, 2005, Rehabitation of large rivers: references, achievements and integration into river management, Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 155, 715
  23. Buss, 2004, Substrate specificity, environmental degradation and disturbance structuring macroinvertebrate assemblages in neotropical streams, Hydrobiologia, 518, 179, 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025067.66126.1c · DOI
  24. Chambers, 1991, Current velocity and its effect on aquatic macrophytes in flowing waters, Ecol. Appl., 1, 249, 10.2307/1941754 · DOI
  25. Charvet, 2000, Traits of benthic macroinvertebrates in semi-natural French streams: an initial application to biomonitoring in Europe, Freshw. Biol., 43, 277, 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00545.x · DOI
  26. Choi, 2004, Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: towards ‘futuristic’ restoration, Ecol. Res., 19, 75, 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00594.x · DOI
  27. Costello, 2015, Biological and ecological traits of marine species, PeerJ, 3, e1201, 10.7717/peerj.1201 · DOI
  28. Crisp, 1996, Environmental requirements of common riverine European salmonid fish species in fresh water with particular reference to physical and chemical aspects, Hydrobiologia, 323, 201, 10.1007/BF00007847 · DOI
  29. Demars, 2012, Linking biotopes to invertebrates in rivers: biological traits, taxonomic composition and diversity, Ecol. Indic., 23, 301, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.011 · DOI
  30. DeVries, 1997, Riverine salmonid egg burial depths: review of published data and implications for scour studies, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 54, 1685, 10.1139/f97-090 · DOI
  31. Dickman, 2005, Benthic diatoms as indicators of stream sediment concentration in Hong Kong, Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 90, 412, 10.1002/iroh.200410806 · DOI
  32. Dolédec, 1999, Species traits for future biomonitoring across ecoregions: patterns along a human-impacted river, Freshw. Biol., 42, 737, 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00509.x · DOI
  33. Dolédec, 2007, Modelling the hydraulic preferences of benthic macroinvertebrates in small European streams, Freshw. Biol., 52, 145, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01663.x · DOI
  34. Downs, 2002, Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration, Environ. Manag., 29, 477, 10.1007/s00267-001-0035-X · DOI
  35. Duan, 2009, Effect of streambed sediment on benthic ecology, Int. J. Sediment Res., 24, 325, 10.1016/S1001-6279(10)60007-8 · DOI
  36. Ecke, 2016, The response of hydrophyte growth forms and plant strategies to river restoration, Hydrobiologia, 769, 41, 10.1007/s10750-015-2605-6 · DOI
  37. Ellis, 1997, Evaluation of a gradient sampling design for environmental impact assessment, Environ. Monit. Assess., 48, 157, 10.1023/A:1005752603707 · DOI
  38. England, 2007, Monitoring, river restoration and the Water Framework Directive, Water Environ. J., 22, 227, 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2007.00090.x · DOI
  39. Everard, 2012, Why does ‘good ecological status’ matter?, Water Environ. J., 26, 165, 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00273.x · DOI
  40. Feld, 2011, From natural to degraded rivers and back again: a test of restoration ecology theory and practice, Adv. Ecol. Res., 44, 119, 10.1016/B978-0-12-374794-5.00003-1 · DOI
  41. Foley, 2005, Global consequences of land use, Science, 309, 570, 10.1126/science.1111772 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Folkard, 2011, Vegetated flows in their environmental context: a review, Proc. Inst. Civil. Eng., 164, 3
  43. Friberg, 2014, Impacts and indicators of change in lotic ecosystem, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water, 1, 513, 10.1002/wat2.1040 · DOI
  44. Friberg, 1994, Restoration of channellized reach of the River Gelså, Denmark. Effects on the macroinvertebrate community, Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 4, 289, 10.1002/aqc.3270040402 · DOI
  45. Frissell, 1986, A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context, Environ. Manag., 12, 199, 10.1007/BF01867358 · DOI
  46. Gabel, 2012, Effects of ship-induced waves on littoral benthic invertebrates, Freshw. Biol., 57, 2425, 10.1111/fwb.12011 · DOI
  47. Gibbins, 2010, Invertebrate drift and benthic exhaustion during disturbance: response of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) to increasing shear stress and river-bed instability, River Res. Appl., 26, 499, 10.1002/rra.1282 · DOI
  48. Gibbins, 2016, Which variables should be used to link invertebrate drift to river hydraulic conditions?, Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 187, 191, 10.1127/fal/2015/0745 · DOI
  49. Glendell, 2014, Testing the pressure-specific invertebrate index (PSI) as a tool for determining ecological relevant targets for reducing sedimentation in streams, Freshw. Biol., 59, 353, 10.1111/fwb.12269 · DOI
  50. Göthe, 2016, Structural and functional response of floodplain vegetation to stream ecosystem restoration, Hydrobiologia, 769, 79, 10.1007/s10750-015-2401-3 · DOI
  51. Gurnell, 2014, Plants as river system engineers, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 39, 4, 10.1002/esp.3397 · DOI
  52. Haase, 2013, The impact of hydromorphological restoration on river ecological status: a comparison of fish, benthic invertebrates, and macrophytes, Hydrobiologia, 704, 475, 10.1007/s10750-012-1255-1 · DOI
  53. Halpern, 2008, A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems, Science, 319, 948, 10.1126/science.1149345 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Hammer, 1995, Fatigue and exercise tests with fish, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol., 112, 1, 10.1016/0300-9629(95)00060-K · DOI
  55. Harding, 1998, Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95, 14843, 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14843 · DOI
  56. Hauer, 2012, Hydro-morphologically related variance in benthic drift and its importance for numerical habitat modelling, Hydrobiologia, 683, 83, 10.1007/s10750-011-0942-7 · DOI
  57. Heino, 2013, The importance of metacommunity ecology for environmental assessment research in the freshwater realm, Biol. Rev., 88, 166, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00244.x · DOI
  58. Hering, 2015, Contrasting the roles of section length and instream habitat enhancement for river restoration success: a field study on 20 European restoration projects, J. Appl. Ecol., 52, 1518, 10.1111/1365-2664.12531 · DOI
  59. Heywood, 2007, The sedimentation of Salmonid spawning gravels in the Hampshire Avon catchment, UK: implications for the dissolved oxygen content of intragravel water and embryo survival, Hydrol. Process., 21, 770, 10.1002/hyp.6266 · DOI
  60. Hines, 2011, Do channel restoration structures promote ammonium uptake and improve macroinvertebrate-based water quality classification in urban streams?, Inland Waters, 1, 133, 10.5268/IW-1.2.395 · DOI
  61. Holomuzki, 2000, Taxon-specific responses to high-flow disturbance in streams: implications for population persistence, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 19, 670, 10.2307/1468125 · DOI
  62. Hughes, 2007, Constraints on recovery: using molecular methods to study connectivity of aquatic biota in rivers and streams, Freshw. Biol., 52, 616, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01722.x · DOI
  63. Iversen, 1993, Re-establishment of Danish streams: restoration and maintenance measures, Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 3, 73, 10.1002/aqc.3270030203 · DOI
  64. Jackson, 2016, Recommendations for the next generation of global freshwater biological monitoring tools, Adv. Ecol. Res., 55, 615, 10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.008 · DOI
  65. Jähnig, 2009, Effects of re-braiding measures on hydromorphology, floodplain vegetation, ground beetles and benthic invertebrates in mountain rivers, J. Appl. Ecol., 46, 406, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01611.x · DOI
  66. Jähnig, 2010, A comparative analysis of restoration measures and their effects on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates in 26 central and southern European rivers, J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 671, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01807.x · DOI
  67. Janauer, 2010, Aquatic macrophytes and water current velocity in the Danube River, Ecol. Eng., 36, 1138, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.05.002 · DOI
  68. Januschke, 2016, Effects of river restoration on riparian ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Europe, Hydrobiologia, 769, 93, 10.1007/s10750-015-2532-6 · DOI
  69. Januschke, 2009, Untersuchung und Auswertung von ausgewählten Renaturierungsbeispielen repräsentativer Fließgewässertypen der Flusseinzugsgebiete Deutschlands. Verbesserung der biologischen Vielfalt in Fließgewässern und ihren Auen, Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege, 82, 23
  70. Januschke, 2011, Effects of stream restorations on riparian mesohabitats, vegetation and carabid beetles: a synopsis of 24 cases from Germany, Biodivers. Conserv., 20, 3147, 10.1007/s10531-011-0119-8 · DOI
  71. Jones, 2014, Interactions between diatoms and fine sediment, Hydrol. Process., 28, 1226, 10.1002/hyp.9671 · DOI
  72. Jowett, 2003, Hydraulic constraints on habitat suitability for benthic invertebrates in gravel-bed rivers, River Res. Appl., 19, 495, 10.1002/rra.734 · DOI
  73. Jowett, 1997, Flood and velocity effects on periphyton and silt accumulation in two New Zealand rivers, N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res., 31, 287, 10.1080/00288330.1997.9516767 · DOI
  74. Julien, 2006, Effect of fine sediment infiltration during the incubation period on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) embryo survival, Hydrobiologia, 563, 61, 10.1007/s10750-005-1035-2 · DOI
  75. Jungwirth, 2000, Fundamentals of fish ecological integrity and their relation to the extended serial discontinuity concept, Hydrobiologia, 422, 85, 10.1023/A:1017045527233 · DOI
  76. Kail, 2011, Analysis and evaluation of large-scale river restoration planning in Germany to better link river research and management, River Res. Appl., 27, 985, 10.1002/rra.1382 · DOI
  77. Kail, 2007, The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria, J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 1145, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01401.x · DOI
  78. Kail, 2012, Limiting factors and thresholds for macroinvertebrate assemblages in European rivers: empirical evidence from three datasets on water quality, catchment urbanization, and river restoration, Ecol. Indic., 18, 62, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.038 · DOI
  79. Kail, 2015, The effect of river restoration on fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes: a meta-analysis, Ecol. Indic., 58, 311, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Kondolf, 1993, The sizes of salmonid spawning gravels, Water Resour. Res., 29, 2275, 10.1029/93WR00402 · DOI
  81. Kondolf, 2001, Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream, Environ. Manag., 28, 761, 10.1007/s002670010260 · DOI
  82. Kondolf, 2006, Process-based ecological river restoration: visualizing three dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages, Ecol. Soc., 11, 5, 10.5751/ES-01747-110205 · DOI
  83. Kristensen, 2013, Riparian forest as a management tool for moderating future thermal conditions of lowland temperate streams, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 10, 6081, 10.5194/hessd-10-6081-2013 · DOI
  84. Kupilas, 2016, River restoration and the trophic structure of benthic invertebrate communities across 16 European restoration projects, Hydrobiologia, 769, 105, 10.1007/s10750-015-2569-6 · DOI
  85. Leibold, 2004, The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology, Ecol. Lett., 7, 601, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x · DOI
  86. Lepori, 2005, Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity?, Ecol. Appl., 15, 2060, 10.1890/04-1372 · DOI
  87. Leps, 2015, Disentangling environmental drivers of benthic invertebrate assemblages: the role of spatial scale and riverscape heterogeneity in a multiple stressor environment, Sci. Total Environ., 536, 546, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.083 · DOI
  88. Letcher, 2005, Policies and tools for sustainable water management in the European Union, Environ. Model. Software, 20, 93, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.01.003 · DOI
  89. Lorenz, 2012, Macrophytes respond to reach-scale river restorations, J. Appl. Ecol., 49, 202, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02082.x · DOI
  90. Lorenz, 2016, Fuzzy cognitive mapping for predicting hydromorphological responses to multiple pressures in rivers, J. Appl. Ecol., 53, 559, 10.1111/1365-2664.12569 · DOI
  91. Madsen, 2001, The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes, Hydrobiologia, 444, 71, 10.1023/A:1017520800568 · DOI
  92. Matthaei, 2003, Local disturbance history affects patchiness of benthic river algae, Freshw. Biol., 48, 1514, 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01103.x · DOI
  93. Maxted, 2003, Development of standard protocols for macroinvertebrate assessment of soft-bottomed streams in New Zealand, N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res., 37, 793, 10.1080/00288330.2003.9517209 · DOI
  94. Mcgill, 2006, Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits, Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 178, 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002 · DOI
  95. Menezes, 2010, Beyond taxonomy: a review of macroinvertebrate trait-based community descriptors as tools for freshwater biomonitoring, J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 711, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01819.x · DOI
  96. Mérigoux, 2004, Hydraulic requirements of stream communities: a case study on invertebrates, Freshw. Biol., 49, 600, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01214.x · DOI
  97. Mérigoux, 2009, Invertebrate hydraulic preferences and predicted impacts of changes in discharge in a large river, Freshw. Biol., 54, 1343, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02160.x · DOI
  98. Miller, 2010, Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: applications of meta-analysis to river restoration, Restor. Ecol., 18, 8, 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00605.x · DOI
  99. Möbes-Hansen, 1998, The influence of hydraulic stress on microdistribution patterns of zoobenthos in a sandstone brook (Weidlingbach, Lower Austria), Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 83, 381, 10.1002/iroh.19980830506 · DOI
  100. O’Hare, 2007, The drag and reconfiguration experienced by five macrophytes from a lowland river, Aquat. Bot., 86, 253, 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.11.004 · DOI
  101. O'Hare, 2011, Physical constraints on the distribution of macrophytes linked with flow and sediment dynamics in British rivers, River Res. Appl., 27, 671, 10.1002/rra.1379 · DOI
  102. Ormerod, 2004, A golden age of river restoration science?, Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 14, 543, 10.1002/aqc.663 · DOI
  103. Osenberg, 1997, Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis, Am. Nat., 150, 798, 10.1086/286095 · DOI
  104. Palmer, 2015, Aligning restoration science and the law to sustain ecological infrastructure for the future, Front. Ecol. Environ., 13, 512, 10.1890/150053 · DOI
  105. Palmer, 1997, Ecological theory and community restoration ecology, Restor. Ecol., 4, 291, 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00543.x · DOI
  106. Palmer, 2004, Ecology for a crowded planet, Science, 304, 1251, 10.1126/science.1095780 · DOI
  107. Palmer, 2005, Standards for ecologically successful river restoration, J. Appl. Ecol., 42, 208, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x · DOI · Paper page
  108. Palmer, 2010, River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice?, Freshw. Biol., 55, 205, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x · DOI
  109. Pan, 2012, Macroinvertebrates in abandoned channels: assemblage characteristics and their indications for channel management, River Res. Appl., 28, 1149, 10.1002/rra.1515 · DOI
  110. Parmesan, 2003, A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems, Nature, 421, 37, 10.1038/nature01286 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Pasternack, 2008, Spawning habitat rehabilitation: advances in analysis tools, Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 65, 321
  112. Pedersen, 2007, Spatio-temporal variations in substratum stability and macroinvertebrates in lowland stream riffles, Aquat. Ecol., 41, 475, 10.1007/s10452-004-1584-x · DOI
  113. Pedersen, 2014, Re-meandering of lowland streams: will disobeying the laws of geomorphology have ecological consequences?, PLoS One, 9, e108558, 10.1371/journal.pone.0108558 · DOI
  114. Poppe, 2015, Assessing restoration effects on hydromorphology in European mid-sized rivers by key hydromorphological parameters, Hydrobiologia, 769, 21, 10.1007/s10750-015-2468-x · DOI
  115. Possingham, 2012, How can we sell evaluating, analyzing and synthesizing to young scientists. Commentary, Anim. Conserv., 15, 229, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00555.x · DOI
  116. Pretty, 2003, River rehabilitation and fish populations: assessing the benefit of instream structures, J. Appl. Ecol., 40, 251, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00808.x · DOI
  117. Puijalon, 2005, Adaptations to increasing hydraulic stress: morphology, hydrodynamics and fitness of two higher aquatic plant species, J. Exp. Bot., 56, 777, 10.1093/jxb/eri063 · DOI
  118. Rabeni, 2005, Stream invertebrate community functional responses to deposited sediment, Aquat. Sci., 67, 395, 10.1007/s00027-005-0793-2 · DOI
  119. Radinger, 2015, Disentangling the effects of habitat suitability, dispersal and fragmentation on river fish distribution, Ecol. Appl., 25, 914, 10.1890/14-0422.1 · DOI
  120. Reice, 1980, The role of substratum in benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution and litter decomposition in a woodland stream, Ecology, 61, 580, 10.2307/1937424 · DOI
  121. Reichert, 2015, The conceptual foundation of environmental decision support, J. Environ. Manage., 154, 316, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.053 · DOI
  122. Richardson, 2011, Integrated stream and wetland restoration: a watershed approach to improved water quality on the landscape, Ecol. Eng., 37, 25, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.09.005 · DOI
  123. Riedl, 2013, Timing of brown trout spawning in Alpine rivers with special consideration of egg burial depth, Ecol. Freshw. Fish, 22, 384, 10.1111/eff.12033 · DOI
  124. Riis, 2003, Hydrologic and hydraulic control of macrophyte establishment and performance in streams, Limnol. Oceanogr., 48, 1488, 10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1488 · DOI
  125. Rinaldi, 2016, Classification of river morphology and hydrology to support management and restoration, Aquat. Sci., 78, 17, 10.1007/s00027-015-0438-z · DOI
  126. Roni, 2002, A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds, N. Am. J. Fish Manag., 22, 1, 10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022<0001:AROSRT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  127. Roni, 2008, Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques, N. Am. J. Fish Manag., 28, 856, 10.1577/M06-169.1 · DOI
  128. Roth, 1996, Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales, Landsc. Ecol., 11, 141, 10.1007/BF02447513 · DOI
  129. Rumps, 2007, Stream restoration in the Pacific Northwest: analysis of interviews with project managers, Restor. Ecol., 15, 506, 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00246.x · DOI
  130. Sala, 2000, Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100, Science, 287, 1770, 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 · DOI · Paper page
  131. Sanderson, 2002, The human footprint and the last of the wild, BioScience, 52, 14, 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  132. Sand-Jensen, 2008, Streamlining of plant patches in streams, Freshw. Biol., 53, 714, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01928.x · DOI
  133. Schmutz, 2014, Ecological effects of rehabilitation measures at the Austrian Danube: a meta-analysis of fish assemblages, Hydrobiologia, 729, 49, 10.1007/s10750-013-1511-z · DOI
  134. Schmutz, 2016, Response of fish assemblages to hydromorphological restoration in central and northern European rivers, Hydrobiologia, 769, 67, 10.1007/s10750-015-2354-6 · DOI
  135. Schutten, 2005, Root anchorage and its significance for submerged plants in shallow lakes, J. Ecol., 93, 556, 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.00980.x · DOI
  136. Singh, 2010, Benthic insect-substratum relationship along an altitudinal gradient in a Himalayan stream, India, Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 36, 215
  137. Smith, 2014, The changing nature of river restoration, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water, 1, 249, 10.1002/wat2.1021 · DOI
  138. Søndergaard, 2007, Lake restoration: successes, failures and long-term effects, J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 1095, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01363.x · DOI
  139. Soulsby, 2001, Fine sediment influence on salmonid spawning habitat in a lowland agricultural stream: a preliminary assessment, Sci. Total Environ., 265, 295, 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00672-0 · DOI
  140. Statzner, 1988, Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 7, 307, 10.2307/1467296 · DOI
  141. Statzner, 1991, Calibration of FST-hemispheres against bottom shear stress in a laboratory flume, Freshw. Biol., 26, 227, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01731.x · DOI
  142. Statzner, 1997, Reproductive traits, habitat use and templet theory: a synthesis of world-wide data on aquatic insects, Freshw. Biol., 38, 109, 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00195.x · DOI
  143. Stephenson, 2009, Covariation of stream community structure and biomass of algae, invertebrates and fish with forest cover at multiple spatial scales, Freshw. Biol., 54, 2139, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02142.x · DOI
  144. Sternecker, 2013, Factors influencing the success of salmonid egg development in river substratum, Ecol. Freshw. Fish, 22, 322, 10.1111/eff.12020 · DOI
  145. Stoll, 2013, Small and impoverished regional species pools constrain colonisation of restored river reaches by fishes, Freshw. Biol., 58, 664, 10.1111/fwb.12068 · DOI
  146. Stoll, 2016, Scale-dependent effects pf river habitat quality on benthic invertebrate communities—implications for stream restoration practice, Sci. Total Environ., 553, 495, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.126 · DOI
  147. Suding, 2004, Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 46, 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  148. Sundermann, 2013, Stressor prioritisation in riverine ecosystems: which environmental factors shape benthic invertebrate assemblage metrics?, Ecol. Indic., 27, 83, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.003 · DOI
  149. Timm, 2008, Macroinvertebrates in Estonian streams: the effects of habitat, season, and sampling effort on some common metrics of biological quality, Est. J. Ecol., 57, 37, 10.3176/eco.2008.1.03 · DOI
  150. Tolkamp, 1982, Microdistribution of macroinvertebrates in lowland streams, Hydrobiol. Bull., 16, 133, 10.1007/BF02255367 · DOI
  151. Tonkin, 2014, Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates, Freshw. Biol., 59, 1843, 10.1111/fwb.12387 · DOI
  152. Vaughan, 2009, Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management, Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 19, 113, 10.1002/aqc.895 · DOI
  153. Verdonschot, 2015, The role of benthic microhabitats in determining the effects of hydromorphological river restoration on macroinvertebrates, Hydrobiologia, 769, 55, 10.1007/s10750-015-2575-8 · DOI
  154. Violin, 2011, Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems, Ecol. Appl., 21, 1932, 10.1890/10-1551.1 · DOI
  155. Walter, 2008, Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills, Science, 319, 299, 10.1126/science.1151716 · DOI · Paper page
  156. Wang, 2007, Linkages between nutrients and assemblages of macroinvertebrates and fish in wadeable streams: implication to nutrient criteria development, Environ. Manag., 39, 194, 10.1007/s00267-006-0135-8 · DOI
  157. Whiteway, 2010, Do in-stream restoration structures enhance salmonid abundance? A meta-analysis, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 67, 831, 10.1139/F10-021 · DOI
  158. Williams, 2014, Adaptive management: from more talk to real action, Environ. Manage., 53, 465, 10.1007/s00267-013-0205-7 · DOI
  159. Wilzbach, 1988, Towards a functional classification of stream invertebrate drift, Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 23, 1244
  160. Winking, 2014, Recolonisation patterns of benthic invertebrates: a field investigation of restored former sewage channels, Freshw. Biol., 59, 1932, 10.1111/fwb.12397 · DOI
  161. Wolter, 2010, Functional vs scenic restoration—challenges to improve fish and fisheries in urban waters, Fish. Manag. Ecol., 17, 176, 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2009.00725.x · DOI
  162. Wolter, 2003, Navigation impacts on freshwater fish assemblages: the ecological relevance of swimming performance, Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 13, 63, 10.1023/A:1026350223459 · DOI
  163. Wolter, 2004, Burst and critical swimming speeds of fish and their ecological relevance in waterways, Berichte des IGB, 20, 77
  164. Wolter, 2016, Temporal and spatial patterns of fish response to hydromorphological processes, River Res. Appl., 32, 190, 10.1002/rra.2980 · DOI
  165. Woodward, 2009, Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and food webs in fresh waters: assembling the jigsaw puzzle, Freshw. Biol., 54, 2171, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02081.x · DOI
  166. Woolsey, 2007, A strategy to assess river restoration success, Freshw. Biol., 52, 752, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01740.x · DOI
  167. Wortley, 2013, Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature, Restor. Ecol., 21, 537, 10.1111/rec.12028 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Friberg, N., Angelopoulos, N. V., Buijse, A. D., Cowx, I. G., Kail, J., Moe, T. F., Moir, H., O’Hare, M. T., Verdonschot, P. F. M., & Wolter, C.
Venue
Advances in Ecological Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2016
Pages
535-611
ISSN
0065-2504
DOI
10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.010
Cited by
92
References
6
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review