Cited by 7Sleep and Work-Related FatigueHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetySleep and Wakefulness Research

Classifying performance impairment in response to sleep loss using pattern recognition algorithms on single session testing

Open access
St. Hilaire, Melissa A., Sullivan, Jason P., Anderson, Clare, Cohen, Daniel A., Barger, Laura K., Lockley, Steven W., Klerman, Elizabeth B.·2013·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

There is currently no "gold standard" marker of cognitive performance impairment resulting from sleep loss. We utilized pattern recognition algorithms to determine which features of data collected under controlled laboratory conditions could most reliably identify cognitive performance impairment in response to sleep loss using data from only one testing session, such as would occur in the "real world" or field conditions. A training set for testing the pattern recognition algorithms was developed using objective Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) and subjective Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) data collected from laboratory studies during which subjects were sleep deprived for 26-52h. The algorithm was then tested in data from both laboratory and field experiments. The pattern recognition algorithm was able to identify performance impairment with a single testing session in individuals studied under laboratory conditions using PVT, KSS, length of time awake and time of day information with sensitivity and specificity as high as 82%. When this algorithm was tested on data collected under real-world conditions from individuals whose data were not in the training set, accuracy of predictions for individuals categorized with low performance impairment were as high as 98%. Predictions for medium and severe performance impairment were less accurate. We conclude that pattern recognition algorithms may be a promising method for identifying performance impairment in individuals using only current information about the individual's behavior. Single testing features (e.g., number of PVT lapses) with high correlation with performance impairment in the laboratory setting may not be the best indicators of performance impairment under real-world conditions. Pattern recognition algorithms should be further tested for their ability to be used in conjunction with other assessments of sleepiness in real-world conditions to quantify performance impairment in response to sleep loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.003

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Witten IH Frank E Transformations: Engineering the input and output Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tool and Techniques, second edition 2005 San Francisco Mogab Kaufmann 285 344

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
St. Hilaire, M. A., Sullivan, J. P., Anderson, C., Cohen, D. A., Barger, L. K., Lockley, S. W., & Klerman, E. B.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
50
Pages
992-1002
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026388100
Cited by
7
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P01-AG009975, RC2-HL101340-0)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R01 OH07567)
  • National Center for Research Resources (1 UL1 RR025758, M01 RR02635, NNX08AD66A)
  • Harvard Catalyst
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute (HFP01701, NCC 9-58 HPF HFP01603)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (RO1 HS12032)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-06-0080/O5NL132)
  • Harvard Medical School
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (K02-HD045459, K24-HL105663, RC2-HL101340, T32-HL07901)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep deprivation, pattern recognition algorithms, psychomotor vigilance task, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, sleepiness detection, real-world environments, time of day
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Arousal, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review