The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impulsivity-like traits and risky driving behaviors among college students
Open accessAbstract
The present study examined the predictive effects of five impulsivity-like traits (Premeditation, Perseverance, Sensation Seeking, Negative Urgency, and Positive Urgency) on driving outcomes (driving errors, driving lapses, driving violations, cell phone driving, traffic citations, and traffic collisions). With a convenience sample of 266 college student drivers, we found that each of the impulsivity-like traits was related to multiple risky driving outcomes. Positive Urgency (tendency to act impulsively when experiencing negative affect) was the most robust predictor of risky driving outcomes. Positive Urgency is a relatively newly conceptualized impulsivity-like trait that was not examined in the driving literature previously, suggesting a strong need to further examine its role as a personality trait related to risky driving. These findings generally support the multidimensional assessment of impulsivity-like traits, and they specifically support the addition of Positive Urgency to a list of risk factors for risky driving behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Evidence indicates that individuals, who are highly sensitive to rewards or impulsive, have a tendency to engage in risky behaviors such as texting on their cell phones while driving (Hayashi et al., 2015; Pearson et al., 2013).”
From Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students (2024) · cites this paper as Pearson et al., 2013
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
MacKinnon, D. P. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203809556 · Cited by 5,618
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00064-7 · Cited by 4,123
(1994) · Cited by 2,675
Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART)
Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.8.2.75 · Cited by 2,336
Progress of Veterinary Science.
Jackson, D. N. (1882) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,971
Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?
REASON, J., MANSTEAD, A., STRADLING, S., BAXTER, J., & CAMPBELL, K. (1990) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139008925335 · Cited by 1,940
Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking
Corr, P. J. (1995) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)90059-4 · Cited by 1,525
Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C. (2007) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.107 · Cited by 1,193
Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults
Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G., & Allsopp, J. F. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90011-x · Cited by 1,163
Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature.
Jonah, B. (1997) · Accident Analysis and Prevention · doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00017-1 · Cited by 875
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7 · Cited by 531
“Evidence indicates that individuals, who are highly sensitive to rewards or impulsive, have a tendency to engage in risky behaviors such as texting on their cell phones while driving (Hayashi et al., 2015; Pearson et al., 2013).”
BackgroundWilmer, H. H., & Chein, J. M. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1011-z · Cited by 194
Problematic smartphone use: an empirically validated model
Pivetta, E., Harkin, L., Billieux, J., Kanjo, E., & Kuss, D. J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.013 · Cited by 149
Impulsivity and driver behaviors, offences and accident involvement: A systematic review
Bıçaksız, P., & Özkan, T. (2015) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.06.001 · Cited by 118
Risk-Taking and Impulsivity: The Role of Mood States and Interoception
Herman, A. M., Critchley, H., & Duka, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01625 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearson, M. R., Murphy, E. M., & Doane, A. N.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Old Dominion University (US)
- Chowan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pearson, Matthew R.
- Venue
- Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 53
- Pages
- 142-148
- ISSN
- 0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5242231
- OpenAlex
- W2023479110
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 19.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA018108)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- risky driving behavior, positive urgency, negative urgency, sensation seeking, perseverance, premeditation, traffic offenses, traffic citations, traffic accidents, driving errors, personality traits
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Automobile Driving, Crime, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dangerous Behavior, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Psychological Tests, Students, Southeastern United States, Cell Phone, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
