Cited by 97Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Identification of novel non-ionic, cationic, zwitterionic, and anionic polyfluoroalkyl substances using UPLC–TOF–MSE high-resolution parent ion search

Xiao, Feng, Golovko, Svetlana A., Golovko, Mikhail Y.·2017·Analytica Chimica Acta

Abstract

Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (poly- and per-PFASs) are a large group of organic compounds that have become the target of investigation due to their widespread occurrence in the environment and biota, coupled with their known or suspected impacts on human health. Recent studies have shown that a significant portion of poly-PFASs remain unidentified. This study presents a time-of-flight mass spectrometry approach based on continuously interleaving scans at low and high collision energies (ToF-MS E) for the rapid identification and characterization of unknown PFASs. The MS E mode allowed for the simultaneous acquisition of full-spectrum accurate mass data of both parent and fragment ions in a single chromatographic run. Specific to PFASs, the hypothesis that PFASs can be selectively detected by the ToF-MS E high-resolution parent-ion search (HRPIS) of their characteristic fragments was confirmed with certified standards of 24 poly- and per-PFAS. After being validated with these certified standards, the innovative HRPIS approach was applied to a group of commercial surfactants, which led to the identification of 47 new and 43 infrequently reported PFASs, including 40 non-ionic, 30 cationic, 15 zwitterionic, and five anionic compounds. It is envisaged that the results, especially the identification of new non-ionic PFASs, may provide important insights into the historical occupational and non-occupational exposure to PFASs from the production and application of these surfactants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aca.2017.08.016

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research has indicated the presence in the environment of numerous other PFAS comprising different molecular structures.

    “Recent research has indicated the presence in the environment of numerous other PFAS comprising different molecular structures (e.g., Baduel et al., 2017; Xiao, 2017; Xiao et al., 2017).”

    From PFAS concentrations in soils: Background levels versus contaminated sites (2020) · cites this paper as Xiao et al., 2017

  • Among recent contaminant discoveries, some are PFAA-precursors that could contribute to environmental PFAA exposure for years to come.

    “Among such recent contaminant discoveries, some are PFAA-precursors (e.g.perfluorooctaneamido quaternary ammonium salt [32]) that could contribute to environmental PFAA exposure for years to come [45], some are legacy substances likely present in the environment for more than 40 years already (e.g.chlorinated perfluoroether sulfonates [42]), while others are likely new current-use alternatives (e.”
  • High-resolution parent ion searches using TOF-MS with continuously interleaving scans at low and high collision energies led to identification of 47 new and 43 infrequently reported PFAS, including 40 non-ionic, 30 cationic, 15 zwitterionic and 5 anionic compounds.

    “which led to the identification of 47 new and 43 infrequently reported PFAS, including 40 non-ionic, 30 cationic, 15 zwitterionic and 5 anionic compounds.”
  • Diverse novel PFAS including anions, zwitterions, cations and neutral species were identified in AFFF samples, Fluorad surfactants, water, airborne particulate matter, fish and circulating blood.

    “diverse novel PFAS including anions, zwitterions, cations and neutral species were identified in AFFF samples [92,93], Fluorad surfactants [94], water [17], airborne particulate matter [16], fish [18] and circulating blood [19].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, F., Golovko, S. A., & Golovko, M. Y.
Affiliations
University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Xiao, Feng
Venue
Analytica Chimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
988
Pages
41-49
ISSN
0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2749140638
Cited by
97
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of North Dakota Vice President of Research & Economic Development Faculty Early Career Award (20622-4000-02545)
  • NIH funded COBRE Mass Spec Core Facility (5P30GM103329-05)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
polyfluoroalkyl substances, perfluorinated compounds, time-of-flight mass spectrometry, commercial surfactants, PFAS exposure, environmental pollutants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review