Cited by 25Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementLibrary Science and Information Literacy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative analysis of workplace morale in academic librarians and the impact of direct supervisors on workplace morale

Open access
Kennedy, Sean P., Garewal, Kevin R.·2020·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Abstract

Many studies have attempted to measure the workplace morale of academic librarians through related variables such as job satisfaction. Other studies have taken a qualitative or phenomenological approach to understanding workplace morale. This exploratory study has two objectives: (1) to quantitatively measure the workplace morale of academic librarians to set an initial baseline measure for future research and (2) to analyze the variables that impact academic librarian morale with an emphasis on the variables that academic library supervisors directly influence. Findings suggest the workplace morale of academic librarians is predicted by several variables within a supervisor's influence including feedback, work autonomy, and supervisor qualities such as communication, transparency, and empowering subordinates. Outside of a small negative relationship to age and work experience, demographics were largely found to not be a predictor of workplace morale. This study also evaluated workplace morale as a predictor of turnover intention in academic librarians. There was a strong statistically significant negative correlation between workplace morale and the turnover intention of academic librarians.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102191

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Allen, 1990, The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1, 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x · DOI
  2. Baker, 2013, Feedback and organizations: Feedback is good, feedback-friendly culture is better, Canadian Psychologist, 54, 260, 10.1037/a0034691 · DOI
  3. Becher, 2019, Understanding the experience of full-time nontenure-track library faculty: Numbers, treatment, and job satisfaction, Journal of Academic of Librarianship, 45, 213, 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.02.015 · DOI
  4. Borden, 2018, Leader arrogance and subordinate outcomes: The role of feedback processes, Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 345, 10.1007/s10869-017-9501-1 · DOI
  5. Bothma, 2013, The validation of the turnover intention scale, SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 1, 10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.507 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Breaugh, J. A. (1999). Further investigation of the work autonomy scales: Two studies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(3), 357-373. · DOI · Paper page
  7. DeConinck, 2015, Outcomes of ethical leadership among salespeople, Journal of Business Research, 68, 1086, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.011 · DOI
  8. Eisenberger, 2002, Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565 · DOI
  9. Farrell, 1988, Meta-analysis of the correlates of employee absence, Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 41, 211
  10. Galbraith, 2016, The impact of faculty status and gender on employee well-being in academic libraries, College and Research Libraries, 77, 71, 10.5860/crl.77.1.71 · DOI
  11. Goler, L., Gale, J., & Grant, A. (2016). Let's not kill performance evaluations yet. Harvard Business Review, 94(11), 90–94.
  12. Harrison, 2006, How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences, The Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305
  13. Huselid, 1995, The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, The Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635
  14. Kendrick, 2017, The low morale experience of academic librarians: A phenomenological study, Journal of Library Administration, 57, 846, 10.1080/01930826.2017.1368325 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kendrick, 2019, Low morale in ethnic and racial minority academic librarians: An experiential study, Library Trends, 68, 174, 10.1353/lib.2019.0036 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Knight, J. A. (2013). Rapid on-boarding of academic librarians: Good economic sense. The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 26(4), 152-160. · DOI
  17. Lam, 2011, The impact of feedback frequency on learning and task performance: Challenging the “more is better” assumption, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 217, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.002 · DOI
  18. Lloyd, 2015, Is my boss really listening to me? The impact of perceived supervisor listening on emotional exhaustion, turnover intention, and organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 509, 10.1007/s10551-014-2242-4 · DOI
  19. Lynch, 1987, Job satisfaction in libraries: A replication, The Library Quarterly, 57, 190, 10.1086/601871 · DOI
  20. Martin, 2018, What do academic librarians value in a leader? Reflections on past positive library leaders and a consideration of future library leaders, College and Research Libraries, 79, 799, 10.5860/crl.79.6.799 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Martin, 2020, Job satisfaction of professional librarians and library staff, Journal of Library Administration, 60, 365, 10.1080/01930826.2020.1721941 · DOI
  22. Matteson, 2016, The relationship between trait affect and job attitudes in library employees, Journal of Library Administration, 56, 810, 10.1080/01930826.2016.1179493 · DOI
  23. McCarthy, 2006, Postfeedback development perceptions: Applying the theory of planned behavior, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17, 245, 10.1002/hrdq.1173 · DOI
  24. Meyer, 2002, Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20, 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Organ, 1995, A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior, Personnel Psychology, 48, 775, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x · DOI
  26. Patillo, 2009, The job itself: The effects of functional units on work autonomy among public and academic librarians, Library Trends, 58, 276, 10.1353/lib.0.0081 · DOI
  27. Raschke, 2003, Hiring and recruitment practices in academic libraries: Problems and solutions. portal, Libraries and the Academy, 3, 53, 10.1353/pla.2003.0017 · DOI
  28. Rosen, 2006, Placing perceptions of politics in the context of the feedback environment, employee attitudes, and job performance, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 211, 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.211 · DOI
  29. Salmoni, 1984, Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal, Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355, 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Sommer, 2012, Does constructive performance feedback improve citizenship intention and job satisfaction? The roles of perceived opportunities for advancement, respect, and mood, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23, 177, 10.1002/hrdq.21132 · DOI
  31. Spector, 1986, Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work, Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 39, 1005
  32. Stilling, 2018, Still a deadly disease? Performance appraisal systems in academic libraries in the United States, College and Research Libraries, 79, 366, 10.5860/crl.79.3.366 · DOI
  33. Subramony, 2008, The relationship between human resource investments and organizational performance: A firm-level examination of equilibrium theory, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 778, 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.778 · DOI
  34. Thompson, 2005, Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 100
  35. Yeh, 2016, Determinants of service innovation in academic libraries through the lens of disruptive innovation, College and Research Libraries, 77, 795, 10.5860/crl.77.6.795 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kennedy, S. P., & Garewal, K. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Akron (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Sean P.
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
102191
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047267273
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
employee morale, academic librarians, direct supervisors, supervisor influence, feedback, employee autonomy, superior-subordinate communication, transparency, turnover intention, job satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review