The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes
Open accessAbstract
Although bilinguals rarely make random errors of language when they speak, research on spoken production provides compelling evidence to suggest that both languages are active when only one language is spoken (e.g., [Poulisse, N. (1999). Slips of the tongue: Speech errors in first and second language production. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins]). Moreover, the parallel activation of the two languages appears to characterize the planning of speech for highly proficient bilinguals as well as second language learners. In this paper, we first review the evidence for cross-language activity during single word production and then consider the two major alternative models of how the intended language is eventually selected. According to language-specific selection models, both languages may be active but bilinguals develop the ability to selectively attend to candidates in the intended language. The alternative model, that candidates from both languages compete for selection, requires that cross-language activity be modulated to allow selection to occur. On the latter view, the selection mechanism may require that candidates in the nontarget language be inhibited. We consider the evidence for such an inhibitory mechanism in a series of recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The verbal fluency task was completed in single-language blocks with the dominant language of the participant performed first to control for language order effects (Kroll et al. 2008).”
From What Heritage Bilinguals Tell Us about the Language of Emotion (2022) · cites this paper as Kroll et al. 2008
In the citing paper
“fluent bilinguals show some measure of activation of both languages and some interaction between them at all times, even in contexts that are entirely driven by only one of the languages.”
From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,295
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,017
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. N. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,036
Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system
GREEN, D. W. (1998) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728998000133 · Cited by 2,807
Handbook of bilingualism : psycholinguistic approaches
Kroll, J. F., & de Groot, A. M. B. (2005) · Cited by 2,097
Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing
Muysken, P. C. (2000) · Cited by 1,810
The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision
Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728902003012 · Cited by 1,730
Bilingualism, Aging, and Cognitive Control: Evidence From the Simon Task.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290 · Cited by 1,618
Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063 · Cited by 1,482
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Engstler, C., & Goldrick, M. (2007). Lexically conditioned variation across languages. In Poster presented at the 4th international workshop on language production.
- Francis, 2003, Repetition priming in picture naming and translation depends on shared processes and their difficulty, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1283
- Guo, T., Misra, M., Bobb, S. C., & Kroll J. F. (2007). Behavioral and ERP measures of competition in bilingual spoken word production. In Paper presented at the 6th international symposium on bilingualism.
- Hoshino, N. (2006). A psycholinguistic study of native language constraints on speaking words in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
- Linck, J. A., & Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (in review). Learning a second language during immersion: Evidence for increased inhibitory control.
- Van Hell, J. G. (1998). Cross-language processing and bilingual memory organization. Unpublished dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 · Cited by 1,386
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/1529100610387084 · Cited by 753
The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment
KROLL, J. F., VAN HELL, J. G., TOKOWICZ, N., & GREEN, D. W. (2010) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s136672891000009x · Cited by 637
Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 · Cited by 693
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra, M., & Guo, T.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Kroll, Judith F.
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 416-430
- ISSN
- 0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2585366
- OpenAlex
- W2099850229
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 44
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F33HD055003, R56HD053146, R01HD053146)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- bilingual speech, language choice, inhibitory processes, language transfer, competition model, speech production, second language learners, spoken word production
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Choice Behavior, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Psycholinguistics, Vocabulary, Multilingualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review