Cited by 18Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Deciphering interference control in adults with ADHD by using distribution analyses and electromyographic activity

Suarez, Isabel, Burle, B., Tobon, C., Pineda, D., Lopera, F., Hasbroucq, T., Casini, L.·2015·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

A deficit in "interference control" is commonly found in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This has mainly been interpreted as difficulties in inhibiting inappropriate responses. However, interference control involves processes other than simply the ability to inhibit. Consequently, we used sophisticated analysis to decipher the additional processes of interference control in these patients. We compared interference control between 16 adults with ADHD and 15 control adults performing a Simon task. In most studies, performance is generally reported in terms of mean error rates and reaction times (RTs). However, here we used distribution analyses of behavioral data, complemented by analyses of electromyographic (EMG) activity. This allowed us to better quantify the control of interference, specifically the part that remains hidden when pure correct trials are not distinguished from partial errors. Partial errors correspond to sub-threshold EMG bursts induced by incorrect responses that immediately precede a correct response. Moreover, besides "online" control, we also investigated cognitive control effects manifesting across consecutive trials. The main findings were that adults with ADHD were slower and showed a larger interference effect in comparison to controls. However, the data revealed that the larger interference effect was due neither to higher impulse expression, nor to a deficit in inhibition but that these patients presented a larger inter…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.010

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suarez, I., Burle, B., Tobon, C., Pineda, D., Lopera, F., Hasbroucq, T., & Casini, L.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
Corresponding author
Casini, L.
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
159
Pages
85-92
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W582644381
Cited by
18
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
  • Repositorio Digital - Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, France)
  • Aix-Marseille Université
  • European Research Council (241077)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, interference control, Simon task, distribution analysis, muscle electrical activity, inhibition, sustained attention, reaction time, adult ADHD
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review