Cited by 45Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neuropsychological Performance Patterns of Adult ADHD Subtypes

LeRoy, Amy, Jacova, Claudia, Young, Caedy·2019·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Neuropsychological performance patterns associated with adult ADHD subtypes are unknown. The aim of the current systematic review was to identify and synthesize available literature regarding neuropsychological performance associated with adult ADHD subtypes. Method: Searches were completed using the databases PsycINFO and PubMed for studies published before March 2017 addressing adult ADHD subtypes and neuropsychological performance. Data characterizing the neuropsychological tests utilized in each study were obtained and sorted into eight domains. To summarize the results of all comparisons (ADHD subtype compared with control, or to each other), we counted the proportion of tests within each domain with significant group differences. Results/Conclusion: We deemed four domains informative in differentiating ADHD subtypes from controls. Of these, memory was the only domain that held promise in distinguishing ADHD-Inattentive and ADHD-Combined. Limitations of the available literature are highlighted and recommendations for future research are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054718773927

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inattentive presentation comprises about 31% of adult ADHD cases, and the pure hyperactive-impulsive presentation only about 7%.

    “The inattentive presentation comprises about 31% of adult cases, and the pure hyperactive–impulsive presentation only about 7% [90].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeRoy, A., Jacova, C., & Young, C.
Affiliations
Pacific University Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Jacova, Claudia
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2018-05-17
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1136-1147
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2804441755
Cited by
45
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
adult ADHD, ADHD subtypes, neuropsychological performance, cognitive domain, memory, neuropsychological assessment, diagnostic differentiation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Perception, Thinking, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review