Cited by 0Student Stress and CopingPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEmotion and Mood Recognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

PUW! Cognitive strength in context: An innovative, multi-modal framework for real-time analysis of stress and socio-emotional functioning

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Student well-being is a multidimensional construct encompassing physical and mental health. However, its assessment in educational contexts remains fragmented, limiting understanding of the diverse factors that shape students' experiences. This gap is particularly pronounced for cognitively strong students (CSS), whose unique intellectual, emotional, and social challenges are frequently overlooked by traditional approaches. OBJECTIVE: Current work introduces a methodology to develop a holistic understanding of student well-being by integrating multimodal data, uncovering key patterns that influence well-being and academic performance, and offering actionable insights for targeted interventions. METHODS: The framework, developed through an extensive literature review and refined using the Delphi method, integrates three core components: physiological measures (e.g., heart rate variability and sleep data) to detect stress; self-reporting tools for qualitative insights; and surveys to capture psychological stressors and socio-economic influences. While broadly applicable, it emphasizes CSS-specific stressors. RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative data are analyzed using large language models for sentiment analyses and classical machine learning techniques analyze physiological and survey data integration. This approach aims to identify patterns in stress and coping mechanisms, offering insights into broader dimensions of well-being. CONCLUSION: This research provides a scalable, ethically grounded methodology for AI-supported assessment of student well-being, supporting interventions that promote healthy development, particularly for CSS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105929

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 68

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Abbasi, 2024, Artificial intelligence in remote monitoring and telemedicine, Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS), 1, 258
  2. Abd-Alrazaq, 2024, The performance of wearable AI in detecting stress among students: Systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26
  3. Akgül, 2022, Resilience among gifted students: Are they prone to anxiety during pandemic?, Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, 10, 153, 10.2478/sjcapp-2022-0016 · DOI
  4. Arza, 2019, Measuring acute stress response through physiological signals: Towards a quantitative assessment of stress, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 57, 271, 10.1007/s11517-018-1879-z · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ayada, 2015, The relationship of stress and blood pressure effectors, Hippokratia, 19, 99
  6. Baccassino, 2023, Giftedness and gifted education: A systematic literature review, Frontiers in Education, 7, 10.3389/feduc.2022.1073007 · DOI
  7. Biró, 2023, AI-assisted fatigue and stamina control for performance sports on IMU-generated multivariate times series datasets, Sensors, 24, 132, 10.3390/s24010132 · DOI
  8. Blaas, 2014, The relationship between social-emotional difficulties and underachievement of gifted students, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24, 243, 10.1017/jgc.2014.1 · DOI
  9. Brysbaert, 2019, How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables, Journal of Cognition, 2, 16, 10.5334/joc.72 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Burani, 2020, Gender differences in anxiety: The mediating role of sensitivity to unpredictable threat, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 153, 127, 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.001 · DOI
  11. Butler, 2016, The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing, International Journal of Wellbeing, 6, 1, 10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Caputo, 2017, Social desirability bias in self-reported well-being measures: Evidence from an online survey, Universitas Psychologica, 16, 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-2.sdsw · DOI
  13. Cassady, 2019, Predicting student depression with measures of general and academic anxieties, Frontiers in Education, 4, 11, 10.3389/feduc.2019.00011 · DOI
  14. Craven, 2024, The Multidimensional Student Well-being (MSW) instrument: Conceptualisation, measurement, and differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous primary and secondary students, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 77, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102274 · DOI
  15. Dailah, 2024, Artificial intelligence in nursing: Technological benefits to nurse’s mental health and patient care quality, Healthcare, 12, 2555, 10.3390/healthcare12242555 · DOI
  16. De Bruyne, 2021, Microvascular resistance reserve for assessment of coronary microvascular function, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 78, 1541, 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.017 · DOI
  17. Diener, 2014, Review of the day reconstruction method (DRM), Social Indicators Research, 116, 255, 10.1007/s11205-013-0279-x · DOI
  18. Dong, 2024, Unveiling the potential of fine arts education in enhancing resilience among Chinese gifted students, Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1402725 · DOI
  19. Emanuel, 2000, What makes clinical research ethical?, JAMA, 283, 2701, 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Eren, 2018, Emotional and behavioral characteristics of gifted children and their families, Nöro Psikiyatri Arşivi
  21. Fredricks, 2005, School engagement, vol. 3, 305
  22. Frost, 1990, The dimensions of perfectionism, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449, 10.1007/BF01172967 · DOI · Paper page
  23. García-Martínez, 2021, Analysing educational interventions with gifted students. Systematic review, Children, 8, 365, 10.3390/children8050365 · DOI
  24. Goodman, 1997, The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. Haque, 2024, Social norms and maternal health information-seeking behavior among adolescent girls: A qualitative study in a slum of Bangladesh, PLoS One, 19, 10.1371/journal.pone.0315002 · DOI
  26. Hellhammer, 2009, Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 163, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.026 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hernando, 2016, Inclusion of respiratory frequency information in heart rate variability analysis for stress assessment, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 20, 1016, 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2553578 · DOI
  28. Hossain, 2023, What constitutes student well-being: A scoping review of students’ perspectives, Child Indicators Research, 16, 447, 10.1007/s12187-022-09990-w · DOI
  29. Jaber, 2022, Stress, depression, anxiety, and burnout among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in a tertiary centre, The Open Nursing Journal, 16, 10.2174/18744346-v16-e2203140 · DOI
  30. Karakoc, 2021, Development of perceived social justice in education scale for primary school students, Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi (IJONASS), 10.38015/sbyy.1010070 · DOI
  31. Kaur, 2017, A systematic review, and meta-analyses, of the impact of health-related claims on dietary choices, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14, 10.1186/s12966-017-0548-1 · DOI
  32. Kern, 2016, The EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being, Psychological Assessment, 28, 586, 10.1037/pas0000201 · DOI
  33. Keyes, 2002, The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207, 10.2307/3090197 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Keyes, 2005, Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539, 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kim, 2018, Stress and heart rate variability: A meta-analysis and review of the literature, Psychiatry Investigation, 15, 235, 10.30773/pi.2017.08.17 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Kirschbaum, 1993, The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’ – A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting, Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76, 10.1159/000119004 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Larson, 1983, Larson, R. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983) The experience sampling method, New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science, 15, 41
  38. Lee, 2021, Perfectionism and the imposter phenomenon in academically talented undergraduates, Gifted Child Quarterly, 65, 220, 10.1177/0016986220969396 · DOI
  39. Leger, 2020, Affective recovery from stress and its associations with sleep, Stress and Health, 36, 693, 10.1002/smi.2966 · DOI
  40. Lundberg, 2017, A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30
  41. Memar, 2021, Stress level classification using statistical analysis of skin conductance signal while driving, SN Applied Sciences, 3, 64, 10.1007/s42452-020-04134-7 · DOI
  42. Michels, 2013, Children’s heart rate variability as stress indicator: Association with reported stress and cortisol, Biological Psychology, 94, 433, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Migliaccio, 2024, The impact of wearable technologies on marginal gains in sports performance: An integrative overview on advances in sports, exercise, and health, Applied Sciences, 14, 6649, 10.3390/app14156649 · DOI
  44. Morilak, 2005, Role of brain norepinephrine in the behavioral response to stress, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 29, 1214, 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Morrow, 2005, Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250, 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Mueller, 2009, Protective factors as barriers to depression in gifted and nongifted adolescents, Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 3, 10.1177/0016986208326552 · DOI
  47. Mukhlis, 2024, A current study of psychological well-being in educational institutions: A systematic literature review, Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18, 382, 10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21136 · DOI
  48. Musat, 2024, Diagnostic applications of AI in sports: A comprehensive review of injury risk prediction methods, Diagnostics, 14, 10.3390/diagnostics14222516 · DOI
  49. Neihart, 1999, The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say?, Roeper Review, 22, 10, 10.1080/02783199909553991 · DOI
  50. Olawade, 2024, Enhancing mental health with Artificial Intelligence: Current trends and future prospects, Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 3
  51. Öpengin, 2023, The cognitive profiles of gifted children: A latent profile analysis using the ASIS, Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7, 400
  52. Petersen, 2013, Gender differences in identification of gifted youth and in gifted program participation: A meta-analysis, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 342, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.002 · DOI
  53. Rammstedt, 2007, Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German, Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203, 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Ramos, 2022, Factors facilitating and hindering the transition to higher education for high-ability students, Journal of College Student Development, 63, 315, 10.1353/csd.2022.0026 · DOI
  55. Reis, 2004, Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban high school, Roeper Review, 27, 110, 10.1080/02783190509554299 · DOI
  56. Renshaw, 2016, The College Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire: A brief, multidimensional measure of undergraduate’s covitality, Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 463, 10.1007/s10902-014-9606-4 · DOI
  57. Reyes Valderas, 2020, Social desirability in the measurement of subjective well-being: A study with Chilean university students, Interdisciplinaria Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 37, 117, 10.16888/interd.2020.37.2.7 · DOI
  58. Shaffer, 2017, An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms, Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Shute, 2021, Stealth assessment of creativity in a physics video game, Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106647 · DOI
  60. Smith, 2008, The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194, 10.1080/10705500802222972 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Staunton, 2024, Ethical framework for FACILITATE: A foundation for the return of clinical trial data to participants, Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408600 · DOI
  62. Strout, 2018, The Child Adolescent Bullying Scale (CABS): Psychometric evaluation of a new measure, Research in Nursing & Health, 41, 252, 10.1002/nur.21871 · DOI
  63. Türkman, 2020, The evolution of the term of giftedness & theories to explain gifted characteristics, Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 7, 17
  64. Vinkers, 2013, Time-dependent changes in altruistic punishment following stress, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 1467, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.012 · DOI
  65. Virtanen, 2020, SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Xie, 2019, Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review, Computers & Education, 140
  67. Zhao, 2022, International students’ mental health amidst COVID-19-A systematic review based on current evidence, Journal Education Research & Perspectives, 49, 29, 10.70953/ERPv49.22002 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Moortgat, R., Verbeke, P., d'Hooge, A., & Cornelis, G.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Moortgat, Rony
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
261
Pages
105929
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416449645
Cited by
0
References
68
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
student well-being, stress detection, social-emotional functioning, multimodal data integration, heart rate variability, sleep data, self-report questionnaire, coping strategies, academic performance, targeted interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Male, Stress, Psychological, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review