Cited by 65Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Duration effects in contingency management treatment of methamphetamine disorders

Open access
Roll, John M., Chudzynski, Joy, Cameron, Jennifer M., Howell, Donelle N., McPherson, Sterling·2013·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether different durations of contingency management (CM) in conjunction with psychosocial treatment produced different rates of abstinence among methamphetamine dependent individuals. Participants were randomized to one of the four 16-week treatment conditions: standard psychosocial treatment or psychosocial treatment plus one of the three durations of CM (one-month, two-month, or four-month). A total of 118 participants were randomized to the four treatment conditions. There were significant differences across treatment conditions for number of consecutive days of methamphetamine abstinence (p<0.05). These differences were in the hypothesized direction, as participants were more likely to remain abstinent through the 16-week trial as CM duration increased. A significant effect of treatment condition (p<0.05) and time (p<0.05) on abstinence over time was also found. Longer durations of CM were more effective for maintaining methamphetamine abstinence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.03.018

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roll, J. M., Chudzynski, J., Cameron, J. M., Howell, D. N., & McPherson, S.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Roll, John M.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
2455-2462
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055974810
Cited by
65
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA170884, R01DA017407, R01DA017084)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
contingency management, methamphetamine dependence, treatment duration, abstinence, psychosocial interventions, substance use disorders, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Behavior Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Methamphetamine, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Psychotherapy, Group, Reinforcement Schedule, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, United States, Substance Abuse Detection, Treatment Outcome, Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review