The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: A state-of-the-art review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Goal Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, has begun to play a significant role in the field of medical devices. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview and classification of additively manufactured medical instruments for diagnostics and surgery by identifying medical and technical aspects. Methods A scientific literature search on additively manufactured medical instruments was conducted using the Scopus database. Results We categorized the relevant articles (71) by considering the novelty of each proposed instrument and its clinical application. Then, we analyzed the relevant articles by examining the reasons behind choosing additive manufacturing technology to produce instruments for diagnostics and surgery. Possible customization (27%) and Cost-effectiveness (23%) were the main reasons expressed. Technical specifications of the additive manufacturing technology and the material used were also analyzed, and a tendency of using material extrusion technology (35% of the applications) and polymeric materials (86% of the applications) was shown. Conclusions Additive manufacturing is opening the door to a new approach in the production of medical devices, which allows the complexity of their designs to be pushed to the extreme. However, we found that technical limitations need to be tackled and important aspects such as sterilization or debris contamination are still not considered to be relevant factors during the design and fabrication process. Keeping in mind the challenges of such a new field, additive manufacturing technology can be considered as a great opportunity to provide easy access to healthcare in developing countries as well as an important step toward patient-specific medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage
Hutmacher, D. W. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6 · Cited by 4,994
Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects
Tumbleston, J. R., Shirvanyants, D., Ermoshkin, N., Janusziewicz, R., Johnson, A. R., Kelly, D., Chen, K., Pinschmidt, R., Rolland, J. P., Ermoshkin, A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2397 · Cited by 2,278
An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots
Wehner, M., Truby, R. L., Fitzgerald, D. J., Mosadegh, B., Whitesides, G. M., Lewis, J. A., & Wood, R. J. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19100 · Cited by 2,127
Printing soft matter in three dimensions
Truby, R. L., & Lewis, J. A. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21003 · Cited by 1,622
3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances
Derakhshanfar, S., Mbeleck, R., Xu, K., Zhang, X., Zhong, W., & Xing, M. (2018) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008 · Cited by 1,027
Material issues in additive manufacturing: A review
Singh, S., Ramakrishna, S., & Singh, R. (2017) · Journal of Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.006 · Cited by 899
Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine
Liaw, C.-Y., & Guvendiren, M. (2017) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aa7279 · Cited by 604
Recent Advances in Extrusion‐Based 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications
Placone, J. K., & Engler, A. J. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201701161 · Cited by 486
Emerging Applications of Bedside 3D Printing in Plastic Surgery
Chae, M. P., Rozen, W. M., McMenamin, P. G., Findlay, M. W., Spychal, R. T., & Hunter-Smith, D. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2015.00025 · Cited by 377
3D-printed upper limb prostheses: a review
ten Kate, J., Smit, G., & Breedveld, P. (2017) · Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2016.1253117 · Cited by 374
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Status and challenges
ZHU, J., ZHOU, H., WANG, C., ZHOU, L., YUAN, S., & ZHANG, W. (2021) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020 · Cited by 874
3D printing technology; methods, biomedical applications, future opportunities and trends
Bozkurt, Y., & Karayel, E. (2021) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.050 · Cited by 384
The role of additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: A critical review
Kumar, R., Kumar, M., & Chohan, J. S. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.022 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Culmone, C., Smit, G., & Breedveld, P.
- Venue
- Additive Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 461-473
- ISSN
- 2214-7810 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-8604
- OpenAlex
- W2931872746
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: A state-of-the-art review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.015
- The paper
- Culmone, C., Smit, G., & Breedveld, P. (2019). Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: A state-of-the-art review. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.