Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,127

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots

Open access
Wehner, Michael, Truby, Ryan L., Fitzgerald, Daniel J., Mosadegh, Bobak, Whitesides, George M., Lewis, Jennifer A., Wood, Robert J.·2016·Nature

Abstract

Soft robots possess many attributes that are difficult, if not impossible, to achieve with conventional robots composed of rigid materials. Yet, despite recent advances, soft robots must still be tethered to hard robotic control systems and power sources. New strategies for creating completely soft robots, including soft analogues of these crucial components, are needed to realize their full potential. Here we report the untethered operation of a robot composed solely of soft materials. The robot is controlled with microfluidic logic that autonomously regulates fluid flow and, hence, catalytic decomposition of an on-board monopropellant fuel supply. Gas generated from the fuel decomposition inflates fluidic networks downstream of the reaction sites, resulting in actuation. The body and microfluidic logic of the robot are fabricated using moulding and soft lithography, respectively, and the pneumatic actuator networks, on-board fuel reservoirs and catalytic reaction chambers needed for movement are patterned within the body via a multi-material, embedded 3D printing technique. The fluidic and elastomeric architectures required for function span several orders of magnitude from the microscale to the macroscale. Our integrated design and rapid fabrication approach enables the programmable assembly of multiple materials within this architecture, laying the foundation for completely soft, autonomous robots.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature19100

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Wang, L. & Iida, F. Deformation in soft-matter robotics: a categorization and quantitative characterization. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 22, 125–139 (2015) · DOI
  2. Shepherd, R. F. et al. Multigait soft robot. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20400–20403 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Onal, C. D., Chen, X., Whitesides, G. M. & Rus, D. Soft mobile robots with on-board chemical pressure generation. In 15th International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR 2011) 1–16 (2011)
  4. Lin, H.-T., Leisk, G. G. & Trimmer, B. GoQBot: a caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspir. Biomim. 6, 026007 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Mosadegh, B. et al. Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 2163–2170 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Tolley, M. T. et al. A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robot. 1, 213–223 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Marchese, A. D., Onal, C. D. & Rus, D. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robot. 1, 75–87 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bartlett, N. W. et al. A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science 349, 161–165 (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Peele, B. N., Wallin, T. J., Zhao, H. & Shepherd, R. F. 3D printing antagonistic systems of artificial muscle using projection stereolithography. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10, 055003 (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mosadegh, B. et al. Integrated elastomeric components for autonomous regulation of sequential and oscillatory flow switching in microfluidic devices. Nat. Phys. 6, 433–437 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wehner, M. et al. Pneumatic energy sources for autonomous and wearable soft robotics. Soft Robot. 1, 263–274 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wu, W., Deconinck, A. & Lewis, J. A. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv. Mater. 23, H178–H183 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Muth, J. T. et al. Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers. Adv. Mater. 26, 6307–6312 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  14. Palleau, E., Morales, D., Dickey, M. D. & Velev, O. D. Reversible patterning and actuation of hydrogels by electrically assisted ionoprinting. Nat. Commun. 4, 2257 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ionov, L. Biomimetic hydrogel-based actuating systems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 4555–4570 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Anderson, I. A., Gisby, T. A., McKay, T. G., O’Brien, B. M. & Calius, E. P. Multi-functional dielectric elastomer artificial muscles for soft and smart machines. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 041101 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  17. Brown, E. et al. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18809–18814 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  18. Suzumori, K. Elastic materials producing compliant robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 18, 135–140 (1996) · DOI
  19. Shepherd, R. F., Stokes, A. A., Nunes, R. M. D. & Whitesides, G. M. Soft machines that are resistant to puncture and that self seal. Adv. Mater. 25, 6709–6713 (2013) · DOI
  20. Suzumori, K., Koga, A., Kondo, F. & Haneda, R. Integrated flexible microactuator systems. Robotica 14, 493–498 (1996) · DOI
  21. Gorissen, B., De Volder, M., De Greef, A. & Reynaerts, D. Theoretical and experimental analysis of pneumatic balloon microactuators. Sens. Actuat. A 168, 58–65 (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2011.03.057
  22. Shepherd, R. F. et al. Using explosions to power a soft robot. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 2892–2896 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  23. Whitesides, G. M. What comes next? Lab Chip 11, 191–193 (2011) · DOI
  24. Mosadegh, B., Tavana, H., Lesher-Perez, S. C. & Takayama, S. High-density fabrication of normally closed microfluidic valves by patterned deactivation of oxidized polydimethylsiloxane. Lab Chip 11, 738–742 (2011) · DOI
  25. Barnes, H. A. Thixotropy—a review. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 70, 1–33 (1997) · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kolesky, D. B. et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 26, 3124–3130 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  27. Mullins, L. Softening of rubber by deformation. Rubber Chem. Technol. 42, 339–362 (1969) · DOI · Paper page
  28. Jensen, E. C., Grover, W. H. & Mathies, R. A. Micropneumatic digital logic structures for integrated microdevice computation and control. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 16, 1378–1385 (2007) · doi:10.1109/jmems.2007.906080
  29. Rhee, M. & Burns, M. A. Microfluidic pneumatic logic circuits and digital pneumatic microprocessors for integrated microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 9, 3131–3143 (2009) · doi:10.1039/b904354c
  30. Toepke, M. W., Abhyankar, V. V. & Beebe, D. J. Microfluidic logic gates and timers. Lab Chip 7, 1449–1453 (2007) · DOI
  31. Groisman, A., Enzelberger, M. & Quake, S. R. Microfluidic memory and control devices. Science 300, 955–958 (2003) · doi:10.1126/science.1083694
  32. Weaver, J. A., Melin, J., Stark, D., Quake, S. R. & Horowitz, M. A. Static control logic for microfluidic devices using pressure-gain valves. Nat. Phys. 6, 218–223 (2010) · doi:10.1038/nphys1513
  33. Prakash, M. & Gershenfeld, N. Microfluidic bubble logic. Science 315, 832–835 (2007) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,127

Metadata

Authors
Wehner, M., Truby, R. L., Fitzgerald, D. J., Mosadegh, B., Whitesides, G. M., Lewis, J. A., & Wood, R. J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-08
Volume
536
Issue
7617
Pages
451-455
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2515930553
Cited by
2,127
References
2
FWCI
82.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature19100
The paper
Wehner, M., Truby, R. L., Fitzgerald, D. J., Mosadegh, B., Whitesides, G. M., Lewis, J. A., & Wood, R. J. (2016). An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.