The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots
Open accessAbstract
Soft robots possess many attributes that are difficult, if not impossible, to achieve with conventional robots composed of rigid materials. Yet, despite recent advances, soft robots must still be tethered to hard robotic control systems and power sources. New strategies for creating completely soft robots, including soft analogues of these crucial components, are needed to realize their full potential. Here we report the untethered operation of a robot composed solely of soft materials. The robot is controlled with microfluidic logic that autonomously regulates fluid flow and, hence, catalytic decomposition of an on-board monopropellant fuel supply. Gas generated from the fuel decomposition inflates fluidic networks downstream of the reaction sites, resulting in actuation. The body and microfluidic logic of the robot are fabricated using moulding and soft lithography, respectively, and the pneumatic actuator networks, on-board fuel reservoirs and catalytic reaction chambers needed for movement are patterned within the body via a multi-material, embedded 3D printing technique. The fluidic and elastomeric architectures required for function span several orders of magnitude from the microscale to the macroscale. Our integrated design and rapid fabrication approach enables the programmable assembly of multiple materials within this architecture, laying the foundation for completely soft, autonomous robots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design, fabrication and control of soft robots
Rus, D., & Tolley, M. T. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14543 · Cited by 5,825
Permeation-driven flow in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices.
Randall, G. C., & Doyle, P. S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503287102 · Cited by 220
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Wang, L. & Iida, F. Deformation in soft-matter robotics: a categorization and quantitative characterization. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 22, 125–139 (2015) · DOI
- Shepherd, R. F. et al. Multigait soft robot. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20400–20403 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
- Onal, C. D., Chen, X., Whitesides, G. M. & Rus, D. Soft mobile robots with on-board chemical pressure generation. In 15th International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR 2011) 1–16 (2011)
- Lin, H.-T., Leisk, G. G. & Trimmer, B. GoQBot: a caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspir. Biomim. 6, 026007 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
- Mosadegh, B. et al. Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 2163–2170 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
- Tolley, M. T. et al. A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robot. 1, 213–223 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
- Marchese, A. D., Onal, C. D. & Rus, D. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robot. 1, 75–87 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
- Bartlett, N. W. et al. A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science 349, 161–165 (2015) · DOI · Paper page
- Peele, B. N., Wallin, T. J., Zhao, H. & Shepherd, R. F. 3D printing antagonistic systems of artificial muscle using projection stereolithography. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10, 055003 (2015) · DOI · Paper page
- Mosadegh, B. et al. Integrated elastomeric components for autonomous regulation of sequential and oscillatory flow switching in microfluidic devices. Nat. Phys. 6, 433–437 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
- Wehner, M. et al. Pneumatic energy sources for autonomous and wearable soft robotics. Soft Robot. 1, 263–274 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
- Wu, W., Deconinck, A. & Lewis, J. A. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv. Mater. 23, H178–H183 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
- Muth, J. T. et al. Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers. Adv. Mater. 26, 6307–6312 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
- Palleau, E., Morales, D., Dickey, M. D. & Velev, O. D. Reversible patterning and actuation of hydrogels by electrically assisted ionoprinting. Nat. Commun. 4, 2257 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
- Ionov, L. Biomimetic hydrogel-based actuating systems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 4555–4570 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, I. A., Gisby, T. A., McKay, T. G., O’Brien, B. M. & Calius, E. P. Multi-functional dielectric elastomer artificial muscles for soft and smart machines. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 041101 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
- Brown, E. et al. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18809–18814 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
- Suzumori, K. Elastic materials producing compliant robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 18, 135–140 (1996) · DOI
- Shepherd, R. F., Stokes, A. A., Nunes, R. M. D. & Whitesides, G. M. Soft machines that are resistant to puncture and that self seal. Adv. Mater. 25, 6709–6713 (2013) · DOI
- Suzumori, K., Koga, A., Kondo, F. & Haneda, R. Integrated flexible microactuator systems. Robotica 14, 493–498 (1996) · DOI
- Gorissen, B., De Volder, M., De Greef, A. & Reynaerts, D. Theoretical and experimental analysis of pneumatic balloon microactuators. Sens. Actuat. A 168, 58–65 (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2011.03.057
- Shepherd, R. F. et al. Using explosions to power a soft robot. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 2892–2896 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
- Whitesides, G. M. What comes next? Lab Chip 11, 191–193 (2011) · DOI
- Mosadegh, B., Tavana, H., Lesher-Perez, S. C. & Takayama, S. High-density fabrication of normally closed microfluidic valves by patterned deactivation of oxidized polydimethylsiloxane. Lab Chip 11, 738–742 (2011) · DOI
- Barnes, H. A. Thixotropy—a review. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 70, 1–33 (1997) · DOI · Paper page
- Kolesky, D. B. et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 26, 3124–3130 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
- Mullins, L. Softening of rubber by deformation. Rubber Chem. Technol. 42, 339–362 (1969) · DOI · Paper page
- Jensen, E. C., Grover, W. H. & Mathies, R. A. Micropneumatic digital logic structures for integrated microdevice computation and control. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 16, 1378–1385 (2007) · doi:10.1109/jmems.2007.906080
- Rhee, M. & Burns, M. A. Microfluidic pneumatic logic circuits and digital pneumatic microprocessors for integrated microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 9, 3131–3143 (2009) · doi:10.1039/b904354c
- Toepke, M. W., Abhyankar, V. V. & Beebe, D. J. Microfluidic logic gates and timers. Lab Chip 7, 1449–1453 (2007) · DOI
- Groisman, A., Enzelberger, M. & Quake, S. R. Microfluidic memory and control devices. Science 300, 955–958 (2003) · doi:10.1126/science.1083694
- Weaver, J. A., Melin, J., Stark, D., Quake, S. R. & Horowitz, M. A. Static control logic for microfluidic devices using pressure-gain valves. Nat. Phys. 6, 218–223 (2010) · doi:10.1038/nphys1513
- Prakash, M. & Gershenfeld, N. Microfluidic bubble logic. Science 315, 832–835 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion
Hu, W., Lum, G. Z., Mastrangeli, M., & Sitti, M. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25443 · Cited by 2,372
Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities
Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B., & Cianchetti, M. (2016) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aah3690 · Cited by 1,570
Soft Actuators for Small-Scale Robotics
Hines, L., Petersen, K., Lum, G. Z., & Sitti, M. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201603483 · Cited by 1,337
The grand challenges of Science Robotics
Yang, G.-Z., Bellingham, J., Dupont, P. E., Fischer, P., Floridi, L., Full, R., Jacobstein, N., Kumar, V., McNutt, M., Merrifield, R., et al. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650 · Cited by 1,177
Self-citationAdvances in 4D Printing: Materials and Applications
Kuang, X., Roach, D. J., Wu, J., Hamel, C. M., Ding, Z., Wang, T., Dunn, M. L., & Qi, H. J. (2019) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201805290 · Cited by 1,095
Metadata
- Authors
- Wehner, M., Truby, R. L., Fitzgerald, D. J., Mosadegh, B., Whitesides, G. M., Lewis, J. A., & Wood, R. J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 536
- Issue
- 7617
- Pages
- 451-455
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2515930553
- Cited by
- 2,127
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 82.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature19100
- The paper
- Wehner, M., Truby, R. L., Fitzgerald, D. J., Mosadegh, B., Whitesides, G. M., Lewis, J. A., & Wood, R. J. (2016). An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.