Cited by 142Mental Health Treatment and AccessSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personal and perceived public mental‐health stigma as predictors of help‐seeking intentions in adolescents

Abstract

This study aimed to determine predictors of help‐seeking intentions for symptoms of depression/anxiety and self‐harm in adolescents. It focused on personal and perceived public stigma to gather data of value for the design of anti‐stigma interventions. Participants (n = 722; 368 girls) were recruited from three cohorts of secondary school students in Ireland (mean ages: 1st = 12.9 years; 3rd = 14.9 years; 5th = 16.6 years). Hierarchical regression models indicated that perceived public stigma is a significant unique predictor of help‐seeking intentions for depression [F(4, 717) = 13.4, p < .001] and self‐harm [F(4, 717) = 13.5, p < .001]. This indicates that young people's beliefs about other people's stigma towards mental health problems was a stronger predictor of help‐seeking intentions than their own stigma beliefs. These findings highlight the importance of looking separately at different types of stigma when investigating the role of stigma in predicting help‐seeking intentions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.05.003

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01741.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1176/appi.ps.61.8.783 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nearchou, F. A., Bird, N., Costello, A., Duggan, S., Gilroy, J., Long, R., McHugh, L., & Hennessy, E.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
  • Nearchou, Finiki A.
  • Bird, Niamh
  • Costello, Audrey
  • Duggan, Sophie
  • Gilroy, Jessica
  • Long, Roisin
  • McHugh, Laura
  • Hennessy, Eilis
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-23
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
83-90
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2804756786
Cited by
135
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M002063/2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental health stigma, perceived public stigma, personal stigma, help-seeking intentions, adolescents, depression, anxiety, self-harm, stigma reduction interventions, high school students
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Ireland, Male, Mental Health, Perception, Intention, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review