Cited by 3Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Developing an Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Adolescents With Anxiety Disorders: Design, Usability, and Initial Evaluation of the CoolMinds Intervention

Open access
Sørensen, Nikita Marie, Skaarnes, Helene, Mathiasen, Kim, Thastum, Mikael, Lomholt, Johanne Jeppesen·2025·JMIR Formative Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Digital mental health interventions may help increase access to psychological treatment for adolescents with anxiety disorders. However, many clinical evaluations of digital treatments report low adherence and engagement and high dropout rates, which remain challenges when the interventions are implemented in routine care. Involving intended end users in the development process through user-centered design methods may help maximize user engagement and establish the validity of interventions for implementation. Objective: This study aimed to describe the methods used to develop a new internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention, CoolMinds, within a user-centered design framework. Methods: The development of intervention content progressed in three iterative design phases: (1) identifying needs and design specifications, (2) designing and testing prototypes, and (3) running feasibility tests with end users. In phase 1, a total of 24 adolescents participated in a user involvement workshop exploring their preferences on graphic identity and communication styles as well as their help-seeking behavior. In phase 2, a total of 4 adolescents attended individual usability tests in which they were presented with a prototype of a psychoeducational session and asked to think aloud about their actions on the platform. In phase 3, a total of 7 families from the feasibility trial participated in a semistructured interview about their satisfaction with and initial impressions of the platform and intervention content while in treatment. Activities in all 3 phases were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded using thematic analysis and qualitative description design. The intervention was continuously revised after each phase based on the feedback. Results: In phase 1, adolescent feedback guided the look and feel of the intervention content (ie, color scheme, animation style, and communication style). Participants generally liked content that was relatable and age appropriate and felt motivating. Animations that resembled “humans” received more votes as adolescents could better “identify” themselves with them. Communication should preferably be “supportive” and feel “like a friend” talking to them. Statements including praise—such as “You’re well on your way. How are you today?”—received the most votes (12 votes), whereas directive statements such as “Tell us how your day has been?” and “How is practicing your steps going?” received the least votes (2 and 0 votes, respectively). In phase 2, adolescents perceived the platform as intuitive and easy to navigate and the session content as easy to understand but lengthy. In phase 3, families were generally satisfied with the intervention content, emphasizing the helpfulness of graphic material to understand therapeutic content. Their feedback helped identify areas for further improvement, such as editing down the material and including more in-session breaks. Conclusions: Using user involvement practices in the development of interventions helps ensure continued alignment of the intervention with end-user needs and may help establish the validity of the intervention for implementation in routine care practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/66966

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies with participatory approaches when developing CBT interventions for youth anxiety have primarily focused on digital interventions.

    “When developing CBT interventions for youth anxiety, previous studies with participatory approaches have primarily been focused on digital interventions [18–23].”

    From Developing a primary care-based cognitive behavioral intervention for anxiety in children through a participatory approach: a qualitative study. (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction (Background; page unavailable) identifies previous studies that used end-user involvement or co-design to develop internet-based CBT interventions for young people with anxiety. It does not compare digital with nondigital participatory studies, so it does not establish that previous work has primarily focused on digital interventions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sørensen, N. M., Skaarnes, H., Mathiasen, K., Thastum, M., & Lomholt, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Sørensen, Nikita Marie
Venue
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2025-04-08
Volume
9
Pages
e66966
ISSN
2561-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408081789
Cited by
3
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Formative Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
TrygFonden
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescents, anxiety disorders, user-centered design, usability testing, help-seeking, animation style, family satisfaction, digital mental health interventions, intervention development, dropout, psychoeducation, help-seeking barriers, help-seeking facilitators, help-seeking self-efficacy
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, User-Centered Design, Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review