Cited by 71Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

A randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy program for adolescents with anxiety disorders

Open access
Stjerneklar, Silke, Hougaard, Esben, McLellan, Lauren F., Thastum, Mikael·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent in adolescence, but access to health care services is limited and only few receive professional help. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) has been proposed to increase accessibility and reduce costs of treatment. OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the efficacy of a Danish version of the guided ICBT program ChilledOut Online, developed at the Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Australia. METHOD: At the Centre for Psychological Treatment of Children and Adolescents, Aarhus University, Denmark, a randomized controlled trial was conducted with 70 adolescents (13-17 years) with anxiety disorders according to DSM-IV. Participants were randomly assigned to a 14-weeks therapist-guided ICBT or to a waitlist condition. Outcomes were evaluated post-treatment and at 3- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: At post-treatment, the ICBT group significantly outperformed the waitlist condition with moderate to large between-group effect sizes on diagnostic severity and anxiety symptoms rated by clinicians, and by adolescents and their parents. Forty percent of adolescents in ICBT were free of their primary diagnosis compared to 16% in the waitlist condition. Treatment gains were maintained at 3- and 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Results of the study provide support for the efficacy of guided ICBT for adolescents with anxiety disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02535403.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0222485

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [58]American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition 4th ed. ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
  2. [73]Attride-Stirling J. Development of methods to capture users’ views of CAMHS in clinical governance reviews Cambridge, UK: Commission for Health Improvement; 2002.
  3. [81]Heck RH, Thomas SL, Tabata LN. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling with IBM SPSS (Quantitative Methodology Series). 2 ed New York and London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis; 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stjerneklar, S., Hougaard, E., McLellan, L. F., & Thastum, M.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Stjerneklar, Silke
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-09-18
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
e0222485
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973964588
Cited by
71
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Trygfonden (100886)
  • Edith and Godtfred Kirk Christiansens Fund (21-5675)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescent anxiety disorders, treatment efficacy, maintenance of treatment gains, access to mental health care, anxiety symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Australia, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Waiting Lists, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review