CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 288Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCardiac Health and Mental HealthComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass patients: A multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and certainty of receiving intercessory prayer

Benson, Herbert, Dusek, Jeffery A., Sherwood, Jane B., Lam, Peter, Bethea, Charles F., Carpenter, William, Levitsky, Sidney, Hill, Peter C., Clem, Donald W., Jain, Manoj K., Drumel, David, Kopecky, Stephen L., Mueller, Paul S., Marek, Dean, Rollins, Sue, Hibberd, Patricia L.·2006·American Heart Journal
DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Intercessory prayer is widely believed to influence recovery from illness, but claims of benefits are not supported by well-controlled clinical trials. Prior studies have not addressed whether prayer itself or knowledge/certainty that prayer is being provided may influence outcome. We evaluated whether (1) receiving intercessory prayer or (2) being certain of receiving intercessory prayer was associated with uncomplicated recovery after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Methods Patients at 6 US hospitals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: 604 received intercessory prayer after being informed that they may or may not receive prayer; 597 did not receive intercessory prayer also after being informed that they may or may not receive prayer; and 601 received intercessory prayer after being informed they would receive prayer. Intercessory prayer was provided for 14 days, starting the night before CABG. The primary outcome was presence of any complication within 30 days of CABG. Secondary outcomes were any major event and mortality. Results In the 2 groups uncertain about receiving intercessory prayer, complications occurred in 52% (315/604) of patients who received intercessory prayer versus 51% (304/597) of those who did not (relative risk 1.02, 95% CI 0.92-1.15). Complications occurred in 59% (352/601) of patients certain of receiving intercessory prayer compared with the 52% (315/604) of those uncertain of receiving intercessory prayer (relative risk 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28). Major events and 30-day mortality were similar across the 3 groups. Conclusions Intercessory prayer itself had no effect on complication-free recovery from CABG, but certainty of receiving intercessory prayer was associated with a higher incidence of complications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.028

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 288

Related

Metadata

Authors
Benson, H., Dusek, J. A., Sherwood, J. B., Lam, P., Bethea, C. F., Carpenter, W., Levitsky, S., Hill, P. C., Clem, D. W., Jain, M. K., Drumel, D., Kopecky, S. L., Mueller, P. S., Marek, D., Rollins, S., & Hibberd, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center (US)
  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US)
  • Baptist Memorial Health Care (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
ORCID
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
151
Issue
4
Pages
934-942
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.028
OpenAlex
W2145595162
Cited by
287
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
37.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
intercessory prayer, coronary artery bypass grafting, postoperative complications, religious coping, cardiac surgery outcomes, 30-day mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Artery Bypass, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Safety, Logistic Models, Faith Healing, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review