Cited by 95Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCardiac Health and Mental HealthWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Prayer and reverence in naturalistic, aesthetic, and socio-moral contexts predicted fewer complications following coronary artery bypass

Ai, Amy L., Wink, Paul, Tice, Terrence N., Bolling, Steven F., Shearer, Marshall·2009·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

This prospective study explores prayer, reverence, and other aspects of faith in postoperative complications and hospital length of stay of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Alongside traditional religiousness measures, we examined sense of reverence in religious and secular contexts. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 177 patients 2 weeks before surgery at a medical center. Medical variables were retrieved from the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons' Database. Logistic and multiple regression models were performed to predict outcomes. Prayer frequencies were associated with reduced complications but not hospitalization. Sense of reverence in secular contexts predicted fewer complications and shorter hospitalization. Controlling for complications reduced the initial influence of reverence on hospitalization, suggesting the potential mediation of complications. No interaction between demographics and faith factors was evident. The role of faith in medicine is complex and context-dependent. Future studies are needed on mediating factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-009-9228-1

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 13 most rigorous CHD studies, nine (69%) found inverse relationships with CHD and one found a positive one.

    “Of the 13 studies with the most rigorous methodology, nine (69%) found inverse relationships with CHD [357–365] and one found a positive one [366].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ai, A. L., Wink, P., Tice, T. N., Bolling, S. F., & Shearer, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Wellesley College (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Ai, Amy L.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2009-10-25
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
570-581
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2086195606
Cited by
95
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Society of Thoracic Surgeons
  • U.S. Public Health Service (1 R03 AGO 15686-01)
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (P50-AT 00011, P50AT000011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
prayer, reverence, faith, coronary artery bypass grafting, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, spirituality in medicine, religiosity
MeSH terms
Adult, Coronary Artery Bypass, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Religion, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review