CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliability and validity of assigning ultraprocessed food categories to 24-h dietary recall data

Sneed, Nadia M., Ukwuani, Somto, Sommer, Evan C., Samuels, Lauren R., Truesdale, Kimberly P., Matheson, Donna, Noerper, Tracy E., Barkin, Shari L., Heerman, William J.·2023·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOI 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2022.10.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2022.10.016

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. da Costa Louzada, 2015, Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil, Rev Saúde Publ., 49, 38
  2. Moubarac, 2017, Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada, Appetite, 108, 512, 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006 · DOI
  3. Cediel, 2021, Ultra-processed foods drive to unhealthy diets: evidence from Chile, Public Health Nutr, 24, 1698, 10.1017/S1368980019004737 · DOI
  4. Parra, 2019, Association between ultra-processed food consumption and the nutrient profile of the Colombian diet in 2005, Salud Publica Mex, 61, 147, 10.21149/9038 · DOI
  5. Marrón-Ponce, 2019, Associations between consumption of ultra-processed foods and intake of nutrients related to chronic non-communicable diseases in Mexico, J Acad Nutr Diet, 119, 1852, 10.1016/j.jand.2019.04.020 · DOI
  6. Machado, 2019, Ultra-processed foods and recommended intake levels of nutrients linked to non-communicable diseases in Australia: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study, BMJ Open, 9, 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029544 · DOI
  7. Martínez Steele, 2016, Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study, BMJ Open, 6, 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Wang, 2021, Trends in consumption of ultraprocessed foods among US Youths aged 2–19 years, 1999–2018, JAMA, 326, 519, 10.1001/jama.2021.10238 · DOI
  9. Baraldi, 2018, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study, BMJ Open, 8, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574 · DOI
  10. Backholer, 2021, Differential exposure to, and potential impact of, unhealthy advertising to children by socio-economic and ethnic groups: a systematic review of the evidence, Obes Rev, 22, 10.1111/obr.13144 · DOI
  11. Moran, 2019, What factors influence ultra-processed food purchases and consumption in households with children? a comparison between participants and non-participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Appetite, 134, 1, 10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.009 · DOI
  12. Kern, 2017, Neighborhood prices of healthier and unhealthier foods and associations with diet quality: evidence from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 14, 10.3390/ijerph14111394 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mokdad, 2018, The state of US health, 1990–2016: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors among US states, JAMA, 319, 1444, 10.1001/jama.2018.0158 · DOI
  14. Monteiro, 2018, The UN decade of nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing, Public Health Nutr, 21, 5, 10.1017/S1368980017000234 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Bleiweiss-Sande, 2019, Robustness of food processing classification systems, Nutrients, 11, 10.3390/nu11061344 · DOI
  16. Gibney, 2018, Ultra-processed foods: definitions and policy issues, Curr Dev Nutr, 3, nzy077, 10.1093/cdn/nzy077 · DOI
  17. Adams, 2015, Characterisation of UK diets according to degree of food processing and associations with socio-demographics and obesity: cross-sectional analysis of UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008–12), Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 12, 160, 10.1186/s12966-015-0317-y · DOI
  18. Marino, 2021, A systematic review of worldwide consumption of ultra-processed foods: findings and criticisms, Nutrients, 13, 2778, 10.3390/nu13082778 · DOI
  19. Monteiro, 2011, Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil, Public Health Nutr, 14, 5, 10.1017/S1368980010003241 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Poti, 2015, Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households?, Am J Clin Nutr, 101, 1251, 10.3945/ajcn.114.100925 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Moubarac, 2013, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health. Evidence from Canada, Public Health Nutr, 16, 2240, 10.1017/S1368980012005009 · DOI
  22. Barkin, 2018, Effect of a behavioral intervention for underserved preschool-age children on change in body mass index: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA, 320, 450, 10.1001/jama.2018.9128 · DOI
  23. Pratt, 2013, Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research (COPTR): interventions addressing multiple influences in childhood and adolescent obesity, Contemp Clin Trials, 36, 406, 10.1016/j.cct.2013.08.010 · DOI
  24. Kuczmarski, 2000, CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development, Vital and health statistics Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey, 246, 1
  25. Hales, 2018, Differences in Obesity prevalence by demographic characteristics and urbanization level among adults in the United States, 2013–2016, JAMA, 319, 2419, 10.1001/jama.2018.7270 · DOI
  26. Monteiro, 2010, A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing, Cad Saude Publica, 26, 2039, 10.1590/S0102-311X2010001100005 · DOI · Paper page
  27. McHugh, 2012, Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic, Biochem Med (Zagreb), 22, 276, 10.11613/BM.2012.031 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Guenther, 2013, Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2010, J Acad Nutr Diet, 113, 569, 10.1016/j.jand.2012.12.016 · DOI
  29. Krebs-Smith, 2018, Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015, J Acad Nutr Diet, 118, 1591, 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Elizabeth, 2020, Ultra-Processed foods and health outcomes: a narrative review, Nutrients, 12, 10.3390/nu12071955 · DOI
  31. Chang, 2021, Association between childhood consumption of ultraprocessed food and adiposity trajectories in the avon longitudinal study of parents and children birth cohort, JAMA Pediatr, 175, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1573 · DOI
  32. Pagliai, 2021, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Br J Nutr, 125, 308, 10.1017/S0007114520002688 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sneed, N. M., Ukwuani, S., Sommer, E. C., Samuels, L. R., Truesdale, K. P., Matheson, D., Noerper, T. E., Barkin, S. L., & Heerman, W. J.
ORCID
Sneed, Nadia M.
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
182-190
ISSN
0002-9165
DOI
10.1016/j.ajcnut.2022.10.016
Cited by
56
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review