Cited by 128Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsForensic and Genetic Research

On the Use of General Control Samples for Genome-wide Association Studies: Genetic Matching Highlights Causal Variants

Open access
Luca, Diana, Ringquist, Steven, Klei, Lambertus, Lee, Ann B., Gieger, Christian, Wichmann, H.-Erich, Schreiber, Stefan, Krawczak, Michael +5 more·2008·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Resources being amassed for genome-wide association (GWA) studies include "control databases" genotyped with a large-scale SNP array. How to use these databases effectively is an open question. We develop a method to match, by genetic ancestry, controls to affected individuals (cases). The impact of this method, especially for heterogeneous human populations, is to reduce the false-positive rate, inflate other spuriously small p values, and have little impact on the p values associated with true positive loci. Thus, it highlights true positives by downplaying false positives. We perform a GWA by matching Americans with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to controls from Germany. Despite the complex study design, these analyses identify numerous loci known to confer risk for T1D.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.11.003

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The method to analyze control and family-based data builds on two related ideas: matched case-control analysis using conditional logistic regression and the natural connection between family-based analysis and conditional logistic regression of alleles found in probands and matched pseudo-controls.

    “The method to analyze control and family-based data (49) builds on two related ideas: matched case–control analysis using conditional logistic regression (e.g. 52) and the natural connection between family-based analysis and conditional logistic regression of alleles found in probands (the transmitted alleles) and matched pseudo-controls (formed from transmitted and un-transmitted alleles) (49).”
  • Ancestry was inferred using clusterGem in GemTools, which found that five dimensions and seven clusters sufficiently described the ancestry space, and 667 subjects were assigned ancestry based on DNA genotypes.

    “Ancestry was determined using clusterGem in GemTools (arXiv:1104.116260,61, http://www.wpic.pitt.edu/wpiccompgen/GemTools/GemTools.htm). Gemtools found that 5 dimensions and 7 clusters were sufficient to describe the ancestry space. Because one sample was missing key phenotypic information, 667 subjects were assigned ancestry based on DNA genotypes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luca, D., Ringquist, S., Klei, L., Lee, A. B., Gieger, C., Wichmann, H.-E., Schreiber, S., Krawczak, M., Lu, Y., Styche, A., Devlin, B., Roeder, K., & Trucco, M.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Corresponding author
Roeder, Kathryn
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
453-463
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097902492
Cited by
128
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (MH057881)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-07-1-0619)
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International
  • George Washington University
  • Joslin Diabetes Center
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
genetic matching, control samples, genome-wide association study, type 1 diabetes, genetic ancestry, false positive rate, heterogeneous populations, causal variants
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Genetics, Population, Germany, Humans, United States, Case-Control Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Databases, Genetic, Control Groups, Inheritance Patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review