Cited by 157Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsForensic and Genetic Research

Genomic Control to the extreme

Devlin, B, Bacanu, Silviu-Alin, Roeder, Kathryn·2004·Nature Genetics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng1104-1129

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devlin, B., Bacanu, S.-A., & Roeder, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Devlin, B
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2004-11
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1129-1130
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2028243947
Cited by
157
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH057881)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
genomic control, genome-wide association study, false positive rate, multiple comparisons, inflation factor
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Epidemiologic Measurements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review