Cited by 484Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic diversity and population structure

Detecting and Estimating Contamination of Human DNA Samples in Sequencing and Array-Based Genotype Data

Open access
Jun, Goo, Flickinger, Matthew, Hetrick, Kurt N., Romm, Jane M., Doheny, Kimberly F., Abecasis, Gonçalo R., Boehnke, Michael, Kang, Hyun Min·2012·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

DNA sample contamination is a serious problem in DNA sequencing studies and may result in systematic genotype misclassification and false positive associations. Although methods exist to detect and filter out cross-species contamination, few methods to detect within-species sample contamination are available. In this paper, we describe methods to identify within-species DNA sample contamination based on (1) a combination of sequencing reads and array-based genotype data, (2) sequence reads alone, and (3) array-based genotype data alone. Analysis of sequencing reads allows contamination detection after sequence data is generated but prior to variant calling; analysis of array-based genotype data allows contamination detection prior to generation of costly sequence data. Through a combination of analysis of in silico and experimentally contaminated samples, we show that our methods can reliably detect and estimate levels of contamination as low as 1%. We evaluate the impact of DNA contamination on genotype accuracy and propose effective strategies to screen for and prevent DNA contamination in sequencing studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.09.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • They excluded 118 sequences with VerifyBAMID freemix ≥4% and 5 sequences with less than 94.5% of CCDS achieving tenfold read depth.

    “We excluded from analyses 118 (0.025%) sequences that achieved a VerifyBAMID freemix (contamination) level of 4% or higher68, and an additional five sequences (0.001%) where less than 94.5% of the CCDS (release 22) achieved a minimum of tenfold read depth69.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]1. Schmieder, R.A.E. ∙ Edwards, R. Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:e17288 Crossref Scopus (529) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Cibulskis, K. ∙ McKenna, A. ∙ Fennell, T. ... ContEst: estimating cross-contamination of human samples in next-generation sequencing data Bioinformatics. 2011; 27:2601-2602 Crossref Scopus (194) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [4]4. Gordon, D. ∙ Yang, Y. ∙ Haynes, C. ... Increasing power for tests of genetic association in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype error by use of double-sampling Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004; 3:e26 Google Scholar
  4. [5]5. Voight, B.F. ∙ Kang, H.M. ∙ Ding, J. ... The metabochip a custom genotyping array for genetic studies of metabolic, cardiovascular, and anthropometric traits PLoS Genet. 2012; 8:e1002793 Crossref Scopus (410) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [6]6. Li, Y. ∙ Sidore, C. ∙ Kang, H.M. ... Low-coverage sequencing: implications for design of complex trait association studies Genome Res. 2011; 21:940-951 Crossref Scopus (233) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [7]7. Browning, B.L. ∙ Yu, Z. Simultaneous genotype calling and haplotype phasing improves genotype accuracy, and reduces false-positive associations for genome-wide association studies Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009; 85:847-861 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (166) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [8]8. Self, S.G. ∙ Liang, K.Y. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1987; 82:605-610 Crossref Scopus (2000) Google Scholar
  8. [9]9. Giannoulatou, E. ∙ Yau, C. ∙ Colella, S. ... GenoSNP: a variational Bayes within-sample SNP genotyping algorithm that does not require a reference population Bioinformatics. 2008; 24:2209-2214 Crossref Scopus (57) PubMed Google Scholar
  9. [10]10. Korn, J.M. ∙ Kuruvilla, F.G. ∙ McCarroll, S.A. ... Integrated genotype calling and association analysis of SNPs, common copy number polymorphisms, and rare CNVs Nat. Genet. 2008; 40:1253-1260 Crossref Scopus (639) PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [11]11. Wang, K. ∙ Li, M. ∙ Hadley, D. ... PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data Genome Res. 2007; 17:1665-1674 Crossref Scopus (1384) PubMed Google Scholar 12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jun, G., Flickinger, M., Hetrick, K. N., Romm, J. M., Doheny, K. F., Abecasis, G. R., Boehnke, M., & Kang, H. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Kang, Hyun Min
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
839-848
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099328768
Cited by
484
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201100011C, HHSN268201100011I, R01HL117626)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH084698, R01MH084698)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R56HG000376, HG005214, HG006513, R01HG000376, U01HG006513, U01HG005214, R01HG007022, HG000376, HHSN268200782096C, T32HG000040)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R13DK088398, DK088398, P30DK020572)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
contamination detection, contamination estimation, sequencing reads, array-based genotyping, genotype misclassification, false positive association, contaminant screening, variant calling
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Genotype, Humans, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Contamination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review