Cited by 252CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBiomedical Ethics and RegulationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Human Germline Genome Editing

Open access
Ormond, Kelly E., Mortlock, Douglas P., Scholes, Derek T., Bombard, Yvonne, Brody, Lawrence C., Faucett, W. Andrew, Garrison, Nanibaa’ A., Hercher, Laura +6 more·2017·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

With CRISPR/Cas9 and other genome-editing technologies, successful somatic and germline genome editing are becoming feasible. To respond, an American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) workgroup developed this position statement, which was approved by the ASHG Board in March 2017. The workgroup included representatives from the UK Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors, Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors, International Genetic Epidemiology Society, and US National Society of Genetic Counselors. These groups, as well as the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Asia Pacific Society of Human Genetics, British Society for Genetic Medicine, Human Genetics Society of Australasia, Professional Society of Genetic Counselors in Asia, and Southern African Society for Human Genetics, endorsed the final statement. The statement includes the following positions. (1) At this time, given the nature and number of unanswered scientific, ethical, and policy questions, it is inappropriate to perform germline gene editing that culminates in human pregnancy. (2) Currently, there is no reason to prohibit in vitro germline genome editing on human embryos and gametes, with appropriate oversight and consent from donors, to facilitate research on the possible future clinical applications of gene editing. There should be no prohibition on making public funds available to support this research. (3) Future clinical application of human germline genome editing should not proceed unless, at a minimum, there is (a) a compelling medical rationale, (b) an evidence base that supports its clinical use, (c) an ethical justification, and (d) a transparent public process to solicit and incorporate stakeholder input.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.012

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ormond, K. E., Mortlock, D. P., Scholes, D. T., Bombard, Y., Brody, L. C., Faucett, W. A., Garrison, N. A., Hercher, L., Isasi, R., Middleton, A., Musunuru, K., Shriner, D., Virani, A., & Young, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • American Society of Human Genetics (US)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (US)
  • National Society of Genetic Counselors (US)
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Wellcome Connecting Science (GB)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Ormond, Kelly E.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
167-176
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2744797881
Cited by
252
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Intramural Research Program of the Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health (CRGGH
  • National Human Genome Research Institute
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • Center for Information Technology
  • Office of the Director at the NIH (1ZIAHG200362)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
germline editing, CRISPR/Cas9, human embryo, gametes, research ethics, genetic counseling, government research funding, stakeholder feedback
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Humans, Social Change, Genome, Human, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review