Cited by 1,487CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity

Open access
Pattanayak, Vikram, Lin, Steven, Guilinger, John P, Ma, Enbo, Doudna, Jennifer A, Liu, David R·2013·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

The RNA-programmable Cas9 endonuclease cleaves double-stranded DNA at sites complementary to a 20-base-pair guide RNA. The Cas9 system has been used to modify genomes in multiple cells and organisms, demonstrating its potential as a facile genome-engineering tool. We used in vitro selection and high-throughput sequencing to determine the propensity of eight guide-RNA:Cas9 complexes to cleave each of 10(12) potential off-target DNA sequences. The selection results predicted five off-target sites in the human genome that were confirmed to undergo genome cleavage in HEK293T cells upon expression of one of two guide-RNA:Cas9 complexes. In contrast to previous models, our results show that guide-RNA:Cas9 specificity extends past a 7- to 12-base-pair seed sequence. Our results also suggest a tradeoff between activity and specificity both in vitro and in cells as a shorter, less-active guide RNA is more specific than a longer, more-active guide RNA. High concentrations of guide-RNA:Cas9 complexes can cleave off-target sites containing mutations near or within the PAM that are not cleaved when enzyme concentrations are limiting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.2673

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In-depth studies on the outcomes of Cas9-induced double-strand break (DSB) repair have shown significant off-target effects, which resulted in substitution, insertion, deletion, and DNA translocation.

    “Moreover, in-depth studies on the outcomes of Cas9-induced double-strand break (DSB) repair have shown significant off-target effects, which resulted in substitution, insertion, deletion, and DNA translocation.”

    From Machine learning-based prediction models to guide the selection of Cas9 variants for efficient gene editing (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

    The paper’s results (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) report Cas9-induced cleavage and evidence of non-homologous end joining at five of 49 tested off-target sites in HEK293T cells. They do not establish the claimed full range of repair outcomes—substitution, insertion, deletion, and DNA translocation. The mutations described relative to intended target sites are pre-existing sequence differences, not reported repair outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pattanayak, V., Lin, S., Guilinger, J. P., Ma, E., Doudna, J. A., & Liu, D. R.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Doudna, Jennifer A
  • Liu, David R
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2013-08-11
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
839-843
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2149402050
Cited by
1,487
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 127 · 2017: 145 · 2016: 149 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 28
FWCI
69.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM073794, T32GM007753)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, seed sequence, in vitro selection, genome editing, PAM sequence, HEK293T cells, human genome
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Endonucleases, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Streptococcus pyogenes, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genomics, HEK293 Cells, RNA, Small Untranslated, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review