Cited by 15Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesGenetics and Physical Performance

Welch-weighted Egger regression reduces false positives due to correlated pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization

Open access
Brown, Brielin C., Knowles, David A.·2021·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Modern population-scale biobanks contain simultaneous measurements of many phenotypes, providing unprecedented opportunity to study the relationship between biomarkers and disease. However, inferring causal effects from observational data is notoriously challenging. Mendelian randomization (MR) has recently received increased attention as a class of methods for estimating causal effects using genetic associations. However, standard methods result in pervasive false positives when two traits share a heritable, unobserved common cause. This is the problem of correlated pleiotropy. Here, we introduce a flexible framework for simulating traits with a common genetic confounder that generalizes recently proposed models, as well as a simple approach we call Welch-weighted Egger regression (WWER) for estimating causal effects. We show in comprehensive simulations that our method substantially reduces false positives due to correlated pleiotropy while being fast enough to apply to hundreds of phenotypes. We apply our method first to a subset of the UK Biobank consisting of blood traits and inflammatory disease, and then to a broader set of 411 heritable phenotypes. We detect many effects with strong literature support, as well as numerous behavioral effects that appear to stem from physician advice given to people at high risk for disease. We conclude that WWER is a powerful tool for exploratory data analysis in ever-growing databases of genotypes and phenotypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.10.006

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Steiger filtering attempts to correct for misspecification by removing SNPs that explain more variation in the outcome than the exposure.

    “Steiger filtering attempts to correct for this misspecification by removing SNPs that explain more variation in the outcome than the exposure.94”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [94]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, B. C., & Knowles, D. A.
Affiliations
New York Genome Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Brown, Brielin C.
  • Knowles, David A.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
108
Issue
12
Pages
2319-2335
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217250127
Cited by
15
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Data Science Institute, Columbia University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
Keywords
Mendelian randomization, false positives, causal effect estimation, genetic confounding, blood characteristics, inflammatory diseases, UK Biobank, behavioral effects, physician recommendations
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Regression Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Genetic Pleiotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review