Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Background The potential of Mendelian Randomization studies is rapidly expanding due to (i) the growing power of GWAS meta-analyses to detect genetic variants associated with several exposures, and (ii) the increasing availability of these genetic variants in large-scale surveys. However, without a proper biological understanding of the pleiotropic working of genetic variants, a fundamental assumption of Mendelian Randomization (the exclusion restriction) can always be contested. Methods We build upon and synthesize recent advances in the econometric literature on instrumental variables (IV) estimation that test and relax the exclusion restriction. Our Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian Randomization (PRMR) method first estimates the degree of pleiotropy, and in turn corrects for it. If a sample exists for which the genetic variants do not affect the exposure, and pleiotropic effects are homogenous, PRMR obtains unbiased estimates of causal effects in case of pleiotropy. Results Simulations show that existing MR methods produce biased estimators for realistic forms of pleiotropy. Under the aforementioned assumptions, PRMR produces unbiased estimators. We illustrate the practical use of PRMR by estimating the causal effect of (i) cigarettes smoked per day on Body Mass Index (BMI); (ii) prostate cancer on self-reported health, and (iii) educational attainment on BMI in the UK Biobank data. Conclusions PRMR allows for instrumental variables that violate the exclusion restriction due to pleiotropy, and corrects for pleiotropy in the estimation of the causal effect. If the degree of pleiotropy is unknown, PRMR can still be used as a sensitivity analysis. Key messages If genetic variants have pleiotropic effects, causal estimates of Mendelian Randomization studies will be biased. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian Randomization (PRMR) produces unbiased causal estimates in case (i) a subsample can be identified for which the genetic variants do not affect the exposure, and (ii) pleiotropic effects are homogenous. If such a subsample does not exist, PRMR can still routinely be reported as a sensitivity analysis in any MR analysis. If pleiotropic effects are not homogenous, PRMR can be used as an informal test to gauge the exclusion restriction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any source of instrument invalidity can be expressed as algebraically equivalent to bias from pleiotropy.
“Although robust methods typically use the term ‘pleiotropy’, any source of instrument invalidity can be expressed as algebraically equivalent to bias from pleiotropy 87”
From Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations (2020) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sudlow, C., Gallacher, J., Allen, N., Beral, V., Burton, P., Danesh, J., Downey, P., Elliott, P., Green, J., Landray, M., et al. (2015) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 · Cited by 12,728 · see citing works
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248 · see citing works
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., & Burgess, S. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv080 · Cited by 9,816 · see citing works
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P. C., & Burgess, S. (2016) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21965 · Cited by 8,922 · see citing works
Mendelian Randomization Analysis With Multiple Genetic Variants Using Summarized Data
Burgess, S., Butterworth, A., & Thompson, S. G. (2013) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21758 · Cited by 6,050 · see citing works
Davey Smith, G., & Ebrahim, S. (2003) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyg070 · Cited by 5,882 · see citing works
Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies
Davey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu328 · Cited by 4,677 · see citing works
Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology
Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sterne, J. A. C., Timpson, N., & Davey Smith, G. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3034 · Cited by 4,618 · see citing works
Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects
Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951620 · Cited by 4,101 · see citing works
Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies
Burgess, S., Thompson, S. G., & CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr036 · Cited by 3,952 · see citing works
Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476536 · Cited by 3,845 · see citing works
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European Countries
Mackenbach, J. P., Stirbu, I., Roskam, A.-J. R., Schaap, M. M., Menvielle, G., Leinsalu, M., & Kunst, A. E. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0707519 · Cited by 3,289 · see citing works
Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
Angrist, J. D., & Imbens, G. W. (1995) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/t0118 · Cited by 2,898 · see citing works
A structural approach to selection bias
Hernán, M. A., Hernández-Díaz, S., & Robins, J. M. (2004) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43 · Cited by 2,844 · see citing works
The Links Between Education and Health
Ross, C. E., & Wu, C.-L. (1995) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096319 · Cited by 1,943 · see citing works
Negative Controls: A Tool for Detecting Confounding and Bias in Observational Studies
Lipsitch, M., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E., & Cohen, T. (2010) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181d61eeb · Cited by 1,583 · see citing works
Bowden, J., Fabiola Del Greco, M., Minelli, C., Smith, G. D., Sheehan, N. A., & Thompson, J. R. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw220 · Cited by 1,572 · see citing works
Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment
Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J. P., Fontana, M. A., Lee, J. J., Pers, T. H., Rietveld, C. A., Turley, P., Chen, G.-B., Emilsson, V., Meddens, S. F. W., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17671 · Cited by 1,297 · see citing works
Self-citationMendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations
Smith, G. D. (2004) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh132 · Cited by 1,222 · see citing works
Consequences of smoking for body weight, body fat distribution, and insulin resistance
Chiolero, A., Faeh, D., Paccaud, F., & Cornuz, J. (2008) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/87.4.801 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
Conley, T. G., Hansen, C., & Rossi, P. E. (2008) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00139 · Cited by 1,189 · see citing works
From the Cradle to the Labor Market? The Effect of Birth Weight on Adult Outcomes
Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J., & Salvanes, K. G. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.1.409 · Cited by 1,146 · see citing works
Riding the Crest of the Teachable Moment: Promoting Long-Term Health After the Diagnosis of Cancer
Demark‐Wahnefried, W., Aziz, N. M., Rowland, J. H., & Pinto, B. M. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.01.230 · Cited by 1,114 · see citing works
Genome-wide meta-analyses identify multiple loci associated with smoking behavior
The Tobacco and Genetics Consortium (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.571 · Cited by 1,098 · see citing works
Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies
Solovieff, N., Cotsapas, C., Lee, P. H., Purcell, S. M., & Smoller, J. W. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3461 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. M. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291055 · Cited by 1,018 · see citing works
Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference
Didelez, V., & Sheehan, N. (2007) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280206077743 · Cited by 923 · see citing works
Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models With Dummy Endogenous Regressors
Angrist, J. D. (2001) · Journal of Business and Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/07350010152472571 · Cited by 848 · see citing works
Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider
Cole, S. R., Platt, R. W., Schisterman, E. F., Chu, H., Westreich, D., Richardson, D., & Poole, C. (2010) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyp334 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Cancer Survivors in the United States: Age, Health, and Disability
Hewitt, M. E., Rowland, J. H., & Yancik, R. (2003) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/58.1.m82 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Angrist, J. D. (2000) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/t0248 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting
Boef, A. G. C., Dekkers, O. M., & le Cessie, S. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv071 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Burden of Illness in Cancer Survivors: Findings From a Population-Based National Sample
Yabroff, K. R., Lawrence, W., Clauser, S., Davis, W. W., & Brown, M. L. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh255 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Smith, G. D., Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R., Timpson, N., Day, I., & Ebrahim, S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040352 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Methodological Challenges in Mendelian Randomization
VanderWeele, T. J., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., Cornelis, M., & Kraft, P. (2014) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000081 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Kim, S., Ryu, H. G., Lee, J., Shin, J., Harikishore, A., Jung, H., Kim, Y. S., Lyu, H.-N., Oh, E.-J., Baek, N., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep15864 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Multiple Experiments for the Causal Link between the Quantity and Quality of Children
Angrist, J. D., Lavy, V., & Schlosser, A. (2010) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/653830 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
The Effect of Education on Adult Mortality and Health: Evidence from Britain
Clark, D., & Royer, H. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.6.2087 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of 87,040 individuals identifies 23 new susceptibility loci for prostate cancer
Olama, A. A. A., Kote‐Jarai, Z., Berndt, S. I., Conti, D. V., Schumacher, F. R., Han, Y., Benlloch, S., Hazelett, D. J., Wang, Z., Saunders, E. J., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3094 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization
Burgess, S., & Thompson, S. G. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyt093 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Ebrahim, S., & Davey Smith, G. (2008) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-007-0448-6 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies.
Swerdlow, D. I., Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Shah, S., Sofat, R., Holmes, M. V., White, J., Mindell, J. S., Kivimaki, M., Brunner, E. J., Whittaker, J. C., et al. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw088 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schooling
Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.xl.4.791 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Mendelian Randomisation and Causal Inference in Observational Epidemiology
Sheehan, N. A., Didelez, V., Burton, P. R., & Tobin, M. D. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050177 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Height, body mass index, and socioeconomic status: mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank
Tyrrell, J., Jones, S. E., Beaumont, R. N., Astley, C. M., Lovell, R., Yaghootkar, H., Tuke, M. A., Ruth, K. S., Freathy, R. M., Hirschhorn, J. N., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i582 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Does education cause better health? A panel data analysis using school reforms for identification
Arendt, J. N. (2005) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.04.008 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Chen, L., Davey Smith, G., Harbord, R. M., & Lewis, S. J. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050052 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Mendelian randomization: where are we now and where are we going?
Burgess, S., Timpson, N. J., Ebrahim, S. B. J., & Smith, G. D. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv108 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Glymour, M. M., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., & Robins, J. M. (2012) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwr323 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Does falling smoking lead to rising obesity?
B, J. G. A., & Frakes, M. (2005) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.07.005 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Kang, H., Zhang, A., Cai, T. T., & Small, D. S. (2016) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2014.994705 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schools
Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2002) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w9358 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Changes in compulsory schooling and the causal effect of education on health: Evidence from Germany
Kemptner, D., Jürges, H., & Reinhold, S. (2011) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.004 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Nitsch, D., Molokhia, M., Smeeth, L. L., Stavola, B. L. D., Whittaker, J. C., & Leon, D. A. (2006) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwj062 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Instrumental Variables: An Econometrician's Perspective
Imbens, G. W. (2014) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/14-sts480 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Munafo, M. R., Timofeeva, M. N., Morris, R. W., Prieto‐Merino, D., Sattar, N. A., Brennan, P., Johnstone, E. C., Relton, C. L., Johnson, P., Walther, D. M., et al. (2012) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djs191 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Genetic Vulnerability and Susceptibility to Substance Dependence
Bierut, L. J. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.015 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Taylor, A. E., Davies, N. M., Ware, J. J., VanderWeele, T., Smith, G. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2014) · Economics & Human Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.002 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization
Davies, N. M., von Hinke Kessler Scholder, S., Farbmacher, H., Burgess, S., Windmeijer, F., & Smith, G. D. (2015) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6358 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Davey Smith, G. (2011) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s12263-010-0181-y · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Genetic markers as instrumental variables
von Hinke, S., Smith, G. D., Lawlor, D. A., Propper, C., & Windmeijer, F. A. G. (2015) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.10.007 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
G = E: What GWAS Can Tell Us about the Environment
Gage, S. H., Davey Smith, G., Ware, J. J., Flint, J., & Munafò, M. R. (2016) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005765 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Braakmann, N. (2011) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.015 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Does schooling affect health behavior? Evidence from the educational expansion in Western Germany
Jürges, H., Reinhold, S., & Salm, M. (2011) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.04.002 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Alcohol intake and cardiovascular risk factors: A Mendelian randomisation study
Cho, Y., Shin, S.-Y., Won, S., Relton, C. L., Smith, G. D., & Shin, M. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep18422 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Rising cigarette prices and rising obesity: Coincidence or unintended consequence?
Courtemanche, C. (2009) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.03.003 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Changes in Compulsory Schooling and the Causal Effect of Education on Health: Evidence from GermanyPreprint
Jürges, H., Reinhold, S., & Kemptner, D. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1641099 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Cawley, J., Dragone, D., & von Hinke, S. (2014) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3118 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Smoking and body weight: Evidence using genetic instruments
Wehby, G. L., Murray, J. C., Wilcox, A. J., & Lie, R. T. (2011) · Economics & Human Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2011.09.002 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The promise and pitfalls of combining genetic and economic research
Fletcher, J. M. (2011) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1745 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Fulfilling the promise of Mendelian randomizationPreprint
Pickrell, J. (2015) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/018150 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Chapter 9 Effects of Education on Adult Health in Sweden: Results from a Natural Experiment
Spasojević, J. (2010) · Contributions to economic analysis · doi:10.1108/s0573-8555(2010)0000290012 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Mendelian randomization: a premature burial?Preprint
Smith, G. D. (2015) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/021386 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Devereux PJ, Black SE, Salvanes KG. From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2007;122(1),409-439.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies
Hemani, G., Bowden, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy163 · Cited by 1,496 · see citing works
Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations
Burgess, S., Davey Smith, G., Davies, N. M., Dudbridge, F., Gill, D., Glymour, M. M., Hartwig, F. P., Holmes, M. V., Minelli, C., Relton, C. L., et al. (2020) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.2 · Cited by 1,273 · see citing works
Mendelian Randomization: Concepts and Scope
Richmond, R. C., & Davey Smith, G. (2022) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040501 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
Labrecque, J., & Swanson, S. A. (2018) · Current Epidemiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40471-018-0152-1 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Spiller, W., Slichter, D., Bowden, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy204 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Minică, C. C., Dolan, C. V., Boomsma, D. I., de Geus, E., & Neale, M. C. (2018) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-018-9904-4 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
How humans can contribute to Mendelian randomization analyses.
Burgess, S., & Davey Smith, G. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyz152 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Spiller, W., Hartwig, F. P., Sanderson, E., Smith, G. D., & Bowden, J. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.27.20162909 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Kippersluis, H., & Rietveld, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Tinbergen Institute (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Rietveld, Cornelius A
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-02-22
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1279-1288
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- PMC
- PMC6124631
- OpenAlex
- W2952904845
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (016-145-082, 016-165-004)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG037398)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
- Keywords
- pleiotropy, exclusion restriction, instrumental variables, causal effect estimation, sensitivity analysis, tobacco smoke exposure, body mass index, prostate cancer, educational attainment, self-reported health, UK Biobank
- MeSH terms
- Disease, Humans, Genetic Variation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Genetic Pleiotropy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review